• Sat
  • Oct 25, 2014
  • Updated: 2:51am
NewsChina
Social Justice

China's dissidents feel the 'chilling effect' as party's muzzling tactics prove effective

PUBLISHED : Thursday, 10 July, 2014, 12:04pm
UPDATED : Thursday, 10 July, 2014, 12:13pm
 

Activists, lawyers, journalists, bloggers, professors – China’s new leaders have taken aim at civil society in what analysts call an effort to muffle dissent that is proving powerfully effective.

The ruling Communist Party has long maintained tight control, nipping in the bud any public outcries or organised efforts that might snowball into “social unrest”.

But experts see a renewed drive under Xi Jinping, who took over as party chief in late 2012 and as state president in early last year, and has since consolidated power and advanced an ambitious agenda including restructuring the economy.

In the latest example, seven activists were charged in Henan province last week with the vague offence of “picking quarrels and provoking trouble” after they held a ceremony marking the 25th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square crackdown on pro-democracy protesters, rights groups said.

Part of that is of course to remove, to eliminate those very dangerous ‘wrong’ messages,” he said. “And that’s what you are seeing today
Zhengxu Wang, professor

“It’s a general intolerance for dissent, a general intolerance for civil society’s development. The whole approach is to concentrate power to promote economic reforms, to emphasise stability,” said Joseph Cheng, a China politics expert at City University of Hong Kong.

One tactic was “to generate deterrence through heavy penalties”, he said. “I have to admit these messages tend to be effective.”

About a dozen rights activists and lawyers have been jailed on convictions ranging from the less serious – such as disrupting public order – to the grave “inciting subversion of state power”, for which 2010 Nobel Peace laureate Liu Xiaobo was sentenced to 11 years in prison.

Many more wait in detention.

Chinese journalists, already barred from publishing stories on sensitive topics, were last month “prohibited from engaging in critical reporting unless they have received the approval of the work unit” by the state media body.

Social networks have become popular alternative sources to state-controlled news outlets. But users felt the chilling effects last September after the Supreme Court warned of three years’ prison for anyone spreading “slanderous” information that was forwarded more than 500 times or viewed on more than 5,000 occasions.

Reinforcing that threat, around that time influential Chinese bloggers were paraded on state television pledging to avoid posts that might have a “negative” social influence.

Academics in May last year reportedly received a notice to avoid teaching seven taboo subjects, including universal values, press freedom, civil society and judicial independence.

Party-style reform

Since taking power, Xi has pledged to tackle some of China’s most urgent problems, reforming economic growth (which gives the party legitimacy but has slowed in recent years) and confronting rampant government corruption that infuriates the public.

“The general message is that the leadership feels it has to concentrate power in order to implement economic reforms in order to maintain stability. And therefore there has been a crackdown,” said Cheng.

The authorities plan to enact reform on their own terms, as they signalled by jailing nearly a dozen activists who also campaigned against corruption by publicly urging officials to disclose their assets.

They belonged to the loose-knit New Citizens Movement, which was seen as a moderate group that did not seek to topple the party but mainly held small protests and group discussions on issues including education and migrant rights.

Xi “knows there are reforms that should be made to maintain the party’s power but at the same time he doesn’t want these reforms to be hijacked or seen as being the result of advocacy of civil society”, said Human Rights Watch China researcher Maya Wang.

Among the string of arrests, that of Pu Zhiqiang, a celebrated rights lawyer who represented dissident artist Ai Weiwei, underscored that the party would act against anyone, she said.

Pu was detained in May and charged the following month with creating disturbances and illegally obtaining personal information.

The authorities’ aggressive approach has prompted activists to back off and social media users to watch what they say, said Wang.

“I think people are generally lying low in multiple areas,” she said.

Controlling the conversation

Clamping down on journalists and bloggers has the multiplier effect of sweeping criticism from general public discussion, analysts said.

“This is what Xi Jinping sees as the war, fighting in the ideological and discursive affairs of the country, like what people think, how people discuss the past and the future, how people discuss the role and legitimacy of the party,” said Zhengxu Wang, a China politics professor at the University of Nottingham.

The party has worked for years to control the conversation, building up a vast network of state-run media alongside a huge censorship system that filters online content, even a constantly updated list of search terms and any oblique references to them.

But Xi has pushed the party to act more forcefully, said Wang.

“It cannot control what people think, but it does try to manage how things are being discussed,” he said.

“Part of that is of course to remove, to eliminate those very dangerous ‘wrong’ messages,” he said. “And that’s what you are seeing today.”

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

4

This article is now closed to comments

req
Tianamen? How does that compare to the outright aggression Europe has imposed on primitive people in the world? The west keep referring to this traffic clearance exercise as an atrocity. I wish they used rubber bullets to achieve the exact same outcome. It would've lasted much longer.
jrfsl
****www.hrichina.org/en/restrictions-detentions-disappearances-and-arrests-related-june-4-2014
godfree.roberts
The Party also has a limited tolerance for western propaganda, which is what the Tiananmen 'massacre' is. There are some fascinating articles from the archives explaining why the CCP refuses to recognize the "Tiananmen massacre", and what actually happened there.
The Columbia Journalism Review critiques coverage of Tiananmen:
****www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_myth_of_tiananmen.php?page=all
US State Department's cables at the time:
****www.alternativeinsight.com/Tiananmen.html
The Massacre that Wasn’t: ****www.globalresearch.ca/what-really-happened-in-tiananmen-square-25-years-ago/5385528
Britain's Daily Telegraph:
****www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8555142/Wikileaks-no-bloodshed-inside-Tiananmen-Square-cables-claim.htm
Australian prof. Greg Clark
****www.gregoryclark.net/jt/page116/page116.html
And the most comprehensive source:
****www.bearcanada.com/china/letstalkabouttam.html
scmpbeijing1
You really are obsessed with apologizing for the Party godfree. How many forums to you work on everyday? Life must be easy in Thailand. So, with all that free time on your hands, why not be a man and pluck up the courage to come over here? Talk face to face with the aged parents or middle-aged siblings of those killed on June 3/4th - most of them by PLA/PAP bullets. Come without your 'official friends ' and 'friendship association guides'. Come alone and unannounced. Preferably on an innocuous date (but be warned, godfree, there are fewer and fewer each year in China!) If the story they're telling you is true, they won't mind, will they? After all, they've nothing to hide, have they? Godfree, honestly, who cares whether innocent young soldiers or innocent demonstrators and bystanders - young and old - died east or west of some line drawn near Fuxingmen? They died. They are not here. Ask their families. And 25 years later nobody in authority in China has the guts to reveal how and why or what happened. Ask around godfree, you can get these relatives' contact details from your friends at the the PSB. Just ask for the grandpas and grandmas and grieving brothers and sister. The ones intimidated and forcibly confined to their homes every time a sensitive date comes around. A quarter of a century on. Could that be because they know something you don't godfree? Go on - ask them.
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or