US and China ‘in talks to restrict North Korea’s energy trade’ after fifth nuclear test
Nations discuss limits on Pyongyang’s trade in coal, iron ore and crude oil as Washington and its allies try to force Kim Jong-un’s regime to abandon pursuit of nuclear weapons
The United States and China are locked in negotiations over curbing North Korea’s energy trade in response to its fifth nuclear test September, according to four diplomats from United Nations Security Council countries with direct knowledge of the talks.
The world’s two biggest economies – both of which can veto any resolution – are discussing restrictions on North Korea’s trade in coal, iron ore and crude oil, according to the diplomats, who asked not to be named because the discussions are private.
Other nations also considering separate sanctions against North Korea once the Security Council acts, the diplomats said.
The US and its allies are seeking to further tighten sanctions against Kim Jong-un’s regime to prod him into abandoning a pursuit of nuclear weapons that has only intensified in recent years, with the latest test coming on September 9.
The measures stand little chance of success without support from China, which has kept its neighbour from collapsing to avoid both a humanitarian crisis and the presence of American and South Korean troops on its border.
“The US wants to strangle North Korea, but is asking China to be the executioner,” said Shi Yongming, an associate research fellow at the Foreign Ministry-run China Institute of International Studies.
China’s foreign ministry confirmed on Tuesday that was in “negotiations with relevant parties” on North Korea without responding to questions on details, including whether restrictions on energy were under discussion.
It said the Security Council should take further actions which are “conducive to solving the nuclear problem on the peninsula and maintaining peace and stability”.
The foreign ministry added that it opposed unilateral sanctions against North Korea and defended its record in enforcing past Security Council resolutions. It vowed “serious punitive actions” against companies or individuals that violate those resolutions.
“We’re willing to cooperate with relevant countries under the condition of mutual respect and on equal footing, but at the same time oppose any country’s so-called long-arm management of Chinese entities or individuals according to its internal laws,” the foreign ministry said.
China accounts for more than 70 per cent of North Korea’s trade and provides most of its food and energy supplies, according to the Council on Foreign Relations.
Data from China’s General Administration of Customs shows that imports of North Korean coal and iron ore increased from January to August compared with the same period in 2015. Information on crude oil was unavailable.
In March the UN passed its toughest sanctions yet against Kim’s regime, but a loophole allows it to trade goods needed for “livelihood“ or emergencies.
China currently allows imports of coal and iron ore – both banned items under the UN sanctions list – from the North if the resources are not related to Pyongyang’s nuclear project.
The response to North Korea’s latest nuclear test is “moving fast, or at least fast by normal Security Council standards”, Britain’s ambassador, Matthew Rycroft, said on Tuesday, without giving further details.
While Beijing may consider some new restrictions on North Korean commodities, a ban on energy trade would lead to the regime’s collapse, Shi said.
It was more likely that China would agree to a more detailed sanctions lists – particularly goods that could be used for both military and civilian purposes, he said.
“A shut-down of trade in essential resources like crude oil and coal would not be possible,“ Shi said.
Last week, the US Justice Department sanctioned the Chinese company Dandong Hongxiang Industrial Development for acting on behalf of a North Korean bank that the US and UN had said provided financial services in support of weapons of mass destruction proliferators.
The public security department in China’s northeastern Liaoning province said last month on its official Weibo account that it had placed Dandong Hongxiang and its bosses under investigation for “serious economic crimes involved in trade activities”. The company is based on the China-North Korea border in Liaoning’s Dandong city.
Targeting smaller companies such as Dandong Hongxiang would “alarm the others of the dangers of trading with North Korea”, said Go Myung-hyun, research fellow at the Asan Institute for Policy Studies in Seoul.
“China is worried of a possible sudden collapse of the North Korean economy when North-China trade is cut, so there could be a compromise such as letting the North trade coal and iron ore with China only to some extent, compared with the previous year.”
The US has already issued a warning to China, and a lawmaker introduced a bill that would block North Korea from accessing the global banking system.
“It would also be useful if Chinese banks and companies understood dealing with North Korean companies is going to be risky,” Ambassador Daniel Fried, the US State Department’s coordinator for sanctions policy, told a Senate subcommittee in September.
Hwang Jae-ho, an expert on Northeast Asian regional security at Hankuk University of Foreign Studies in Seoul, said it was possible that Beijing might reach a consensus with Washington to impose further sanctions on Pyongyang.
However, the scope of any new sanctions might be limited as a result of the US deployment of its Terminal High Altitude Area Defence (THAAD) anti-missile system in South Korea, which China regards as a security threat.
“The real problem lies in how severe the sanction is,” Hwang said.
“I do not think a THAAD-infuriated China would impose a strict sanction this time, because North Korea is a card China could use against US.”
Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has called for stronger sanctions.
However, Russia is more lukewarm about economic penalties while still calling for a Security Council response.
“The Security Council’s goal must be to resolve the problem, not just take steps that benefit one or another group of countries,” Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said on September 29.
“So the decision to be adopted by the Security Council should be proportionate and meet the required task.”
Additional reporting by Kristin Huang