NewsHong Kong
HOUSING

Demand from mainland buyers key to new long-term HK housing strategy

Members of committee tasked with drawing up long-term housing plan for city say restrictions may have to be imposed to keep prices in check

Monday, 24 September, 2012, 12:00am

Poll

  • Yes: 45%
  • No: 55%
24 Sep 2012
  • Yes
  • No

Hong Kong's first new long-term housing strategy in 14 years must take into account demand from mainland buyers to provide a basis for price-control measures, say members of the committee set up to compile the plan.

One committee member said taxes and restrictions on loans to non-locals for second homes should also be explored to ensure housing serves local needs.

The Long-Term Housing Strategy Steering Committee - due to meet for the first time next month and chaired by the housing minister, Professor Anthony Cheung Bing-leung - is tasked with coming up with a projection of the city's housing needs and making recommendations on how to meet demand.

Cash-rich mainland buyers have been accused of inflating property prices, which this year surpassed their 1997 peak. But the government does not record how many homes are sold to non-locals.

Estate agents provide estimates based on the spelling of clients' names, meaning those buying through companies are missed, but say mainlanders account for more than 20 per cent of luxury flat sales.

Marco Wu Moon-hoi, a member of the committee and an adviser to Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying's election campaign, said the study should include a new category of demand from mainland buyers.

"Times have changed. We cannot ignore their demand and have to consider how to accommodate their needs - provided they are genuine needs," said Wu, a former director of buildings. "We have to do a survey to find out how many of them buy a home for self-use, how many for long-term investment and for speculation. We also need to take into account those who come regularly for short stays."

Fellow committee member, Michael Choi Ngai-min, said lawyers may be required to record the nationalities of buyers when processing transactions in future.

Another member said the panel might have to go further in restricting non-local buyers.

Professor Eddie Hui Chi-man, an expert in real estate at Polytechnic University, said the success of Leung's plans to make two new developments at Kai Tak available only to local buyers would be assessed, but less restrictive measures to curb speculation would also be explored.

He said the authorities should look at extra stamp duties to curb excessive outside investment, like those introduced in Singapore last year, or tightening mortgage loans to outsiders buying a second property in the city.

But Wu and Choi said long-term restrictions on non-local ownership would not fit in with Hong Kong's status as a free economy and the locals-only rule should be seen as a short-term measure to cool the market.

"If a mainlander buys a home and leases it to locals, this will not affect housing supply," Choi said.

Choi said the government had to make it easier for young people to buy or rent a home. It should look at the waiting list for public rental housing, where about a quarter of the 200,000 applicants are students or young graduates.

The comments come amid a debate over plans for three new towns in the northeastern New Territories, which would displace thousands of villagers. The government says the homes are needed to meet a housing shortfall, but critics have accused it of failing to take into account changing projections for population growth, the need for government-subsidised home ownership and the impact of mainland buyers on the local market.

The last attempt to project the city's housing needs and systematically identify sites to meet flat production targets was in 1998. The steering committee responsible for implementing the strategy was wound up as home prices slumped in 2003.

 

10

This article is now closed to comments

vsa1
Rather than considering the current levels of inflation, woes of the local home buyers and the xenophobia that often runs far too rampant; this committee must consider long term prospects.
What we need is to consider the negative impact of short sightedness. Greedy developers and property agents enjoy record profits year after year with little regard for long term social or environmental impact. Chinese buyers are not the uneducated ilk that some might consider. The article writes of business and Chinese buyers purchasing luxury properties, not the shoe boxes that you or I are stuck with. These people are investors more than buyers, as in short term profit.
What I am far more concerned with, is the possible plummeting housing values, that might occur if Chinese investors starting pulling out en masse. With the exports of goods from China falling, factory owners that are strapped for cash might start pulling out of our city. The result would cause a cascading effect of falling prices throughout all property sectors. Rich and middle class investors alike would suffer the brunt of an exodus of cash.
Chinese investment must be curbed for the sake of preventing such an event from happening in the future. We might like the idea of considerably cheap housing but who is going to buy all the extra housing? Who is going to pay for the upkeep of these extraneous buildings and adjacent infrastructure, when the investors leave for greener pastures?
donniemcm
Well during Donald Tsang times it was obvious he and his peers benefits a lot of selling so called Luxury properties. Now with Leung we have a ray of hope that this whole money orgy slow down.
It's so upsetting and ridiculous to hear from the property conglomerates words such as "oh please don't write laws against us otherwise it will impact locals" before Leung made any announcements.
Now there are words such as "oh your new law won't affect us" while they gave incentives such as free car parks, payment facilities. All of this in order to somehow cheer up the market and ridiculize any new policies.
They are so lame and shameful.
aplucky1
the singapore model works
tung chi wa tried to emulate this but got crucified by the evil greedy li ka shing and his ilk
maybe they will take another stab at it
pyklib
why need to consider the needs of mainlanders of buying property? most of them just pulled up the property prices and not for self use
goldfisxx
because the government is doing nothing to prevent them buying. taking such factor into account for planning does not equal to planning to favor them.
jpinst
The should just stop **** around and requires that all Chinese citizens who buy property in Hong Kong must be residents of Hong Kong. You can't keep talented and educated people here if they can only ever hope for a shoe box. People are mobile nowadays and they will just emigrate, and Hong KOng will be stuck with an influx of uneducated mainlanders on public assistance to replace them. They really need to get serious about this.
ed_kwok
It is encouraging to hear that the committee members recognise Hong Kong's land must be for the benefit of Hong Kong's people. Commentators who still support a "free economy" are living in the past. Today's foreign investors are not interested in building businesses that contribute jobs and taxes. They are here to make fast money from our property and stock markets. Our tax-free environment and unregulated real estate sector are ideal for these parasites. Shanghai, Beijing and Guangzhou are not free economies but when was the last time anyone said these economic powerhouses were uncompetitive? The committee has important work to do. As a Hong Kong resident, I wish it well.
likingming
I've speculated on the mainland property market and earned a lot. If you are not xenophobia, you will see the world as a whole.
jpinst
The mainland is giant, has 1.3 billion people and plenty of places to live. Hong Kong is very small and has to find a decent place to live for its 7 millions citizens. There is no comparison between the two.
donniemcm
As the saying says : The freedom of one ends where that of the other begins.

Login

SCMP.com Account

or