NewsHong Kong
HOUSING

Hong Kong's land crisis justifies small-house review

Saturday, 20 October, 2012, 10:54am

Hong Kong's chronic land shortage justifies a review of the small-house policy for indigenous villagers in the New Territories, the development minister said yesterday.

It is the first time the new administration has touched on the sensitive issue.

"Under our current priority to make efficient use of land resources, I agree there is a need to review the small-house policy," Secretary for Development Paul Chan Mo-po wrote in a newspaper column.

"This will inevitably involve issues of law, environment and land planning. It needs to be done cautiously, in discussions with different stakeholders and the public. It cannot be resolved by simple talks or within a year."

Land supply figures released this week show the government has reserved more public land for small houses than for urban housing - 932.9 hectares as opposed to 391.5 hectares.

Responding to calls for vacant sites zoned for village houses to be used for other types of homes, Chan said it was not always feasible, as many sites were fragmented and scattered around existing villages, without roads or sewerage.

However, an examination by the Post of a government map found a number of such sites were conveniently located on the fringes of new towns.

In Sha Tin, a vacant site of about 13,000 square metres lies next to the Yu Chui Court subsidised housing project. That is larger than a public housing site in Kowloon City with 860 flats.

There was also a 15,000 square metre site near the Tai Po Industrial Estate, and sites of 6,000 square metres and 4,000 square metres in Po Sheung Tsuen, Sheung Shui, in North district.

The small-house policy, introduced in 1972, gives male indigenous villagers the right to build a house, usually of three storeys on a 700 sq ft site, close to their ancestral homes, or if that cannot be found, on government land. While intended as a temporary measure, no end date for the scheme was set, and it has been criticised as discriminatory and open to abuse for profit.

Tung Chee-hwa's administration began a review of the policy, including the possibility of allowing buildings with more floors, but it was later shelved.

"Super-seat" lawmaker James To Kun-sun said the policy must end and the government should not reserve land for future generations of villagers when urban residents have a housing problem.

Executive Councillor Barry Cheung Chun-yuen agreed on the need to review the small-house policy, but he said the principle was not to extinguish rights.

"The existing operation is not sustainable," he said.

More than 10,000 applications for village houses are pending.

3

This article is now closed to comments

megafun
villagers' rights was for ONE dwelling, and in this age - that ought to mean an average size apartment ........Say 300 Sq ft??? in a 30 storey block. Similar to HKHA's harmony blocks?
caractacus
Recommend reading for Paul Chan is Civic Exchange's "Rethinking the Small House Policy" of September 2003 which is an excellent analysis of the issue.
In the 9 years since then nothing has been done by Government to address the problems. Systematic abuse of the policy in collusion with Government Departments has become rampant and the potential corruption identified by the ICAC is the norm. Developers frequently pay indigenous villagers for fraudulently use of their 'ding' rights and 'villagers' living all over the world are falling over themselves in the scramble to cash in without any thought for what uncontrolled building is doing to their native villages and the environment. Many Village Representatives solicit and obtain advantages for smoothing the application process in what the public already knows is a vast open sewer of lawlessness.
keresearch
Mr Cheung, prior to your EXCO appointment I was not aware that you had any policy experience. The NT villagers do not have rights to build 2,100 square feet village houses. It is an administration concession.

Login

SCMP.com Account

or