• Sun
  • Oct 26, 2014
  • Updated: 1:05am
NewsHong Kong
SOCIAL WELFARE

Myths about poor justify Hong Kong's 'third world' spending on social welfare

Economist says convenient myths justify city's third-world level of spending on social welfare

PUBLISHED : Friday, 30 November, 2012, 12:00am
UPDATED : Friday, 30 November, 2012, 3:20am
 

Deliberate demonising of social welfare and labour protection is behind the city's backward policies in these areas, according to Leo Goodstadt, the former head of the Central Policy Unit.

Goodstadt, who served as the chief of the government think tank from 1989 to 1997, said common myths that people were poor because they were lazy, or that social welfare would lead to government bankruptcy, were unfounded but used incessantly as reasons against the adoption of a more comprehensive social-security system.

"There has always been huge resistance to welfare in Hong Kong's history, despite the terrible conditions," Goodstadt said yesterday at City University, where he delivered a lecture on social welfare and labour policies from the 1930s to the present.

Hong Kong's social spending was still at third-world standards, he said, even though its large fiscal reserves could easily accommodate more of such outlays. What social spending there has been in the city's history has mostly been the colonial government's response to crises - like the Shek Kip Mei fire in 1953 and the Star Ferry riots in 1966.

"Welfare has a low political priority when compared to autonomy and integrity issues," Goodstadt said, pointing to how issues like the Article 23 security legislation and national education have been at the forefront of the political agenda.

He believes that once Hong Kong realises that its way of life will survive, then attention will turn to welfare and how to improve the quality of life.

He also said the government avoided providing figures on poverty, as that would expose how terrible the situation was.

Goodstadt criticised the government for dragging its feet on immediate measures to relieve poverty. And he said establishing a poverty line would not make much difference - it would simply create "endless arguments about how to define poverty" without offering solutions.

 

Share

Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

2

This article is now closed to comments

babyhenry
"social welfare would lead to government bankruptcy, were unfounded "
Already Bankrupt: Greece, Ireland, Spain, Portugal, Italy.
Next in line: England, Scotland, France, USA (the only reason why its still not bankrupt its all thanks to it being a global reserve currency, well to be fair it got a **** load of wars bills to pay for) & Japan.
Thanks to the modern finance of ignoring debt, many more will have been bankrupted already like Argentina not so long ago.
mrlcooper
When I moved to Hong Kong as an expat, I was shocked by the obvious poverty - what first struck me was the number of elderly and frail people doing manual work - and I probably haven't seen the half of it.
It cannot be right that people like me get tax discounts while others suffer.
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or