• Mon
  • Dec 29, 2014
  • Updated: 3:38am
Leung Chun-ying
NewsHong Kong

Division in Legco may hit universal suffrage, Leung says

Chief executive says divisions in Legco create difficulties in obtaining a two-thirds majority that could hinder major electoral reforms

PUBLISHED : Monday, 17 December, 2012, 12:00am
UPDATED : Monday, 17 December, 2012, 7:07am

Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying yesterday said political divisions may undermine hopes of directly electing the chief executive by 2017 and choosing all lawmakers by universal suffrage in 2020.

He said that with a divided legislature, it was difficult to win a two-thirds majority to push through major changes.

Speaking at a "meet the public" forum organised by RTHK, he was addressing a question on how he would achieve direct election of the chief executive and the Legislative Council, and especially the abolition of the council's functional constituencies.

He said: "It's not a matter of whether the government has the determination to do that.

"The Basic Law says that any big changes in Legco will have to be supported by a two-thirds majority. Now we have 70 lawmakers, getting the two-thirds is quite difficult."

Leung said it was "a big challenge" for him to lobby political parties to win backing for his policies. He said: "When you've won support from two parties and go on to the third party, it says something - and then the first party changes views again."

The government has stated its goal is to elect the chief executive and the legislature by universal suffrage in 2017 and 2020 respectively.

Civic Party leader Alan Leong Kah-kit said the chief executive's words on universal suffrage were "disheartening".

He said: "He ignored the important fact that he is occupying the pivotal position to bring about consensus ... I wouldn't be surprised if one day he really used this as an excuse for not pushing forward the reform."

Emily Lau Wai-hing, newly elected Democratic Party chairwoman, said Leung had a duty to communicate to Beijing the people's wish for universal suffrage.

She said this was "very clear" and warned: "He'd better not lay the blame on lawmakers."

The RTHK "Voices From the Hall" forum was a relatively peaceful assembly compared with recent meetings Leung had attended, which were punctuated by loud protests inside and outside the venues.

Leung's audience was made up of 95 people - more than one third of whom were aged 40 to 59 and another third over 60 - who had been invited by the University of Hong Kong's public opinion programme to attend the session as an audience representative of the city's age and gender structure. They were asked to pose questions concerning three issues - the economy, livelihood matters and politics.

Answering calls for more affordable homes, Leung appealed for public support for increasing building intensity in certain areas, saying some public housing projects often met resistance from people who didn't want their views blocked. Leung also said he would review the town planning process, which was too lengthy for changing land use for building homes.

He said his first policy address next month would offer a five-year blueprint with a focus on housing, poverty, an ageing society and the environment.

He dismissed the idea of handing out cash to all citizens, saying public money should be given only to the needy. He also admitted the controversy over his illegal structures had caused distress to the administration.

Kent Ip Chun-keung, 28, who did not have a chance to ask a question about universal suffrage, said the audience was "rather mild" towards Leung.

He said: "I am scared if this is really a miniature of the society.

"Our society is old but there are many twenty-somethings who are vocal about policy and reform."


More on this story

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

Of course the Pan Dems don't want Democracy in HK. If one day we do, and they couldn't produce a candidate that can lead and not act like a clown anymore they will simply become insignificant, no wonder the Pan Dems are all trying hard to act like wild moneys just let out of a zoo.
Whether you like it or not, Pan Dems is Beijing's best friend and Beijing is Pan Dem's best friend, without eachother their act, speeches, protests, etc will be pointless.
Must we divide amongst ourselves in every single issue ? My expectation to the Chief Executive and the Legislators is not just to hear them citing the problem or voicing out their stance but to see them work whole-heartedly with their wisdom, knowledge and experience to reach a solution. I firmly believe everyone involved has the duty to create an harmonic atmosphere to facilite such work.
Emily Lau Wai-hing, newly elected Democratic Party chairwoman, warned "He'd better not lay the blame on lawmakers."
She would say this. She epitomizes the type of fake 'democrats' who now make this territory ungovernable. She and her gang are not really concerned with people's issues, only their personal lust for power. For the first time in almost a decade we now have a C.E. who is trying genuinely to improve the livelihood of Hong Kong's less well off, but Lau and her supporters spend all their time undermining every effort he and his government make in the right direction.
The idea that Western style democracy can always provide good government is a farce. Look at Europe and USA where the system has failed the people. You have now have many countries in Europe where 25-50% of youth have never had a lob or any realistic prospect of finding one. In USA you have a government which invades distant countries killing countless innocent people in their contrived "war on terror", while all the time the real terrorists are their own gun-toting people slaughtering children in school yards.
I really can't see what the problem is. He can order the Gov't supporters to vote for it and the rest want to vote for it. The problem is that he doesn't want to introduce the legislation. The DAB (Do Anything Boss?) Party can just be instructed by the powers that be to follow an order, as they did in the CE Election. On one hand he wants us to accept that his Gov't has a sworn duty to uphold the Basic Law, vis-a-vis Article 23, but on the other hand wants us all to forget Article 145. CY deliver on what you promised in the election. Be a leader that will change things for the better, not just a weasel always looking to talk your way out trouble.


SCMP.com Account