NewsHong Kong
EMPLOYMENT

No pay cut for civil service graduates, body advises

Starting salaries HK$2,000 above market rate, but commission backs attractive joining wage

Wednesday, 19 December, 2012, 3:20am

An influential advisory body on civil service pay would not recommend cutting the starting salaries of university educated civil servants, despite its research revealing they are paid HK$2,000 above market rate.

The report by the Standing Commission on Civil Service Salaries and Conditions of Service was welcomed by unionists who argued a pay cut would deter top talents from joining the government.

According to the starting salaries survey, monthly pay for university graduates joining the private sector between April last year and this April averaged HK$20,432. Those who joined the government earned about 8.8 per cent more, at HK$22,405 a month. The jobs included executive officer II, simultaneous interpreter and assistant social work officers.

For lower-ranking officers, such as cleaners, the survey showed their monthly salaries averaged HK$10,155 at entry levels, about 5.7 per cent higher than the market rate, which averaged HK$9,575.

Despite the clear discrepancy in starting salaries between the public and private sectors, the commission backed no change.

Chairman Wilfred Wong Ying-wai said the findings "should not be applied in a mechanical manner".

"We have considered the current economic climate and it is the best judgment," he said. "New recruits in private sectors, such as management trainees, could have bigger pay rises as they gather more experience, but in the government you have to follow the pay structure."

The survey, which is conducted every three years, covered 10,370 employees in 135 companies.

Federation of Civil Service Unions chairman Leung Chau-ting said it was "a wise decision" to maintain stable starting salaries for civil servants.

"To many university graduates, it is no longer an attractive option to join the government," he said.

"[Also] if you lower this starting level this time and increase it some years later, it could create an embarrassing scenario where the seniors and juniors are earning the same amount of money."

3

This article is now closed to comments

likingming
Long queues of applicants for a normal clerical civil post and the extreme low wastage (turnover) rates of the civil services (compared with 1980-90) tell you a lot. It is unhealthy for both the private and public sectors.
likingming
Apart from the Govt Associates (tycoons, civil servants, welfare dependants, licensed monopolies), all other non-associate ordinary people are most likely to be exploited.
The majority poor have to suffer with long working hours (or two jobs) and live in poverty.
They are the servants of the civil servants.
bmr
This really doesn't tell us much. You could have just said, 'No Pay Cut for...' and left it at that.
Honestly, I tire of the constant attacks on civil service pay (I have been on the pay scale for more than 10 years while not being in the Civil Service). We get pay cuts supposedly to reflect economic realities. Economic realities are that we accept we will never get 13 or even 14 months salary. We will not get bonuses and we, in the vast majority of cases, will never have the opportunity to argue for additional pay based on performance or anything else. What we do get is a reasonably good salary with regular pay reviews.
How was the average starting salary in the private sector calculated?

Login

SCMP.com Account

or