NewsHong Kong
IMMIGRATION

Singapore population push puts spotlight on Hong Kong

Rival's plans to allow in thousands of expats raises stakes for city, after its own attempts to halt fall in birth rate were branded a failure

Wednesday, 30 January, 2013, 11:14am

A major push by Singapore to boost immigration over the next two decades has led to calls for Hong Kong to get its act together on population policy.

The Lion City unveiled ambitious plans yesterday to open its doors to hundreds of thousands of expatriate workers.

The move could see foreigners making up nearly half of Singapore's population by 2030.

It was inspired by concerns about the falling birth rate and ageing population, which mirror those in Hong Kong.

In a controversial white paper, Singapore officials said the city's population needs to rise by as much as 30 per cent over the next 17 years, to between 6.5 million and 6.9 million.

They plan to meet that target by taking in between 15,000 and 25,000 new citizens, including foreign-born professionals, and granting about 30,000 permanent resident permits each year. The Singapore proposals prompted accusations from some that an expatriate-led solution is a betrayal of locals.

They come days after Hong Kong's attempts to reverse its falling birth rate were branded a failure by Professor Paul Yip Siu-fai, of the University of Hong Kong.

He is a member of a new steering committee, headed by Chief Secretary Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor, tasked with formulating a population policy blueprint.

In response to Singapore's plan, Yip described the situation facing Hong Kong as "very urgent".

He blamed a lack of top-level planning, the responsibility for which he said could be laid in part at the door of the administration of former chief executive Donald Tsang Yam-kuen.

It would be difficult to import foreign workers to Hong Kong as the community is unlikely to reach a consensus on such a move
Paul Yip Siu-fai, University of Hong Kong

He acknowledged that the Singaporean government did not face the same "political obstacles" as the SAR and also pointed out that the path the Lion City was taking might not be suitable for Hong Kong.

"It would be difficult to import foreign workers to Hong Kong as the community is unlikely to reach a consensus on such a move. However, the problem is very urgent as the city's workforce is on the decrease," he said.

Chinese University Professor Hau Kit-tai, also a member of the steering committee, said it would be difficult for Hong Kong to follow the Singapore model.

"Home prices are already high in Hong Kong. It could further push up the prices if more people move in," said Hau.

The policy paper, released by the National Population and Talent Division, said the proportion of Singaporean citizens would fall to 55 per cent by 2030, from 62 per cent last year, when the population was 5.31 million.

Minister for National Development Khaw Boon Wan said: "Hong Kong in terms of density is much higher, and we must never try to reach that area."

Agence France-Presse, Bloomberg

16

This article is now closed to comments

johnyuan
I support China’s continuation on population control. China has been a victim of overpopulation both caused by tradition for old age support by offspring or Mao’s misguided duplication of other tradition for economic growth with population growth. Hong Kong and Singapore still upholding such traditions and exhaustively raising population by local inducement or immigration. As a government population policy it can’t be more of a one-track thinking. Why population increase can assure prosperity now and security liken in the past for our future when means of livelihood have been so different from the tradition. Why wouldn’t the management of one’s wealth and working longer time all couldn’t safeguard one’s old age security? For all those who refuse to take these factors yet to propose population growth are both lacking confidence in themselves or underestimating the intelligence of the future generation. Or may be just being selfish just looking for financial gain even it is not quite needed? Yes, letting the future population begets just more population problems.
boondeiyan
What consensus? Who needs consensus? You stay here for seven years and you get an ID card...maybe even including domestic helpers at long last (but that is a separate pot I shan't stir). If you are a HK-born Cantonese speaker with a Canadian/Australian/NZ passport, are you a foreigner? So why am I a foreigner if I am born in HK and hold one of those passports but don't speak Cantonese as my mother tongue? 嘿,你的普通话怎么样? Some commenters might do with a bit of deep reflection on what it means to live in HK in 2013. Instead of looking to history you turn inward and embrace xenophobia. HK is what it is today ONLY because of outsiders, whether British or Shanghainese or Chiu Chow. Turning your backs on this heritage will not do any of you one bit of good on July 1, 2047. A forward-looking policy platform that paves the way for HK's place within China is urgently needed. Otherwise this place goes back to being a mid-tier port city and the pendulum swings -- once again -- to Shanghai. If this is how you want to treat "foreigners" then I will take my job (and the GDP I create) elsewhere and leave you choking on smog in CY's newly enlarged Mid Levels Estate. I'm thinking the weather in Singapore is kinda nice...
queenyfong@hotmail.com
I entirely agree that raising a child in Hong Kong is too expensive. After I have my first kid, I hesitate whether I should have my second one simply because it's too expensive to raise a kid. I also have a friend who is moving back to US due to large expenditure and stressful childhood here. The main expenditure goes to all kind of playgroup, extra-curricular activities, educational funds...Although the parents do not 100% agree on the teaching method (at least, I don't), they still will go due to the peer pressure. You could say that the mentality of HK parents should change but deeply, it is caused by the educational system...
SpeakFreely
They are much smarter to develop policy to grow their city with plan vs HK has no plan. We have 200k mainland baby but there is no guarantee they will stay behind to contribute after took their education but for sure they will take the benefits. Even for the top students studying here and stay behind to work on work permit, we have no clear policy to attract them. So we are wasting a lot of resource and left behind old and uneducated people.
lyono
well its difficult to plan for the 200k mainland babies partly bcause the chinese/HK gov makes it so difficult for the parents to come here and live..it takes like 2 fuckg wks for the mainland parents to get a permit to stay for 3 mths.. after 3 mths they have to repeat the 2 fuckg wks.. does it make any sense? besides, after 2047 HK would b another Chinese City.. wont it make sense to bring in more babies and educate them here than bring in Philp, Whites, etc
SpeakFreely
The AO led government from Tsang government that HK people always admire and respect has no vision and left behind a time bomb now we have over 200k babies we have responsibilities but no guarantee return. Plus doctors made tons of money and also help developers to sell more flats. We hK people suffer. Hey, make Lam (most popular) the CE and repeat the dump AO led government, dump HK people! What can I say.
SpeakFreely
Despite how dishonest CY is yet to be proven if HK is respecting common Law that we stick to benefits of doubt, at least he stopped the mainland mom. Not Tsang or Lam or the legco knows how to do it. Wake up HK people!
cymrulad
It seems the world is obsessed with growth (population, businesses) rather than stability. The current models bring boom and bust. Surely a steady and controlled moderate growth would be better all round - for society and the environment. All ready we have problems of land fill, schooling, housing and pollution - further growth without making what we currently have sustainable is lunacy.
An ageing population is of course not to be ignored (caused by previous growth followed by a fall in birth rate). Encouraging people in Hong Kong to have families would be more cohesive than importing people. For that to happen the government would have to understand and care about the reasons people are not having children.
likingming
We need another great leader with vision.
With zero-quota of mainlanders giving birth here, HK is destined to doom
Kevin Lau
It is impossible for the public to reach a consencus to immigrating more foreigners. The only approach for HK to solve the aging population issue is to encourage the young couples to have more babies. Simply, the government has to proveide subsidies as incentives to stimulate the public for higher birth rate. As we known, the expense is too high for the young couples to raise children. It is detering the couples!
megafun
Hong Kong is overcrowded, but only in its present unplanned state! HK can grow alot and must grow, like any other major cities. None of the locals in major cities - Shanghai / Beijiang - wants migrants either. But, cities must be big and huge to work well. What is require is better plans, or in HK's case - some planning. Moreover, once we have set our plans, get it DONE! CY plan to construct housing quickly for all who are suffering problems of accomodation, however, he does not move fast nor has the guts to overcome objections, resolve objectors' issues, side-step unresolved obstacles. The present situation on land-for-housing, or for private developers, is a case in point. He is right insofar that there will always be obsjections to the use of any piece of land, even if its a grave! (such as in a disuse abandoned quarry)
cwiahk
Well, if it's population density for Hong Kong Island, it's 16,390/km²
pnelnik
: Minister for National Development Khaw Boon Wan said:
"Hong Kong in terms of density is much higher
He is simply wrong.
HK population density is: 6,480 people per sq km
Singapore has a density of: 7315 people per sq km
SpeakFreely
U are kidding or never been to Singapore. Simply their avg. home size is over 1,000 sq ft. Because singapore developed a lot Land vs HK had not. Simply dividing the population by area is not the correct comparison.
ianson
(1) Hong Kong is badly overcrowded; increasing the population is bad news for all;
(2) Housing standards continue to fall, in terms of average apartment size available;
(3) The seriously growing imbalance of old over young is creating a big future economic challenge;
So has anyone got any ideas how to ship all the oldies out rather than bringing young'uns in?
The government ought to get cracking to develop a scheme whereby it offers substantial cash incentives to facilitate retirement age persons getting the **** [incredible! I used the word H - E - L - L here but it was automatically censored out!] out of here. They could match the cash they offer the Hong Konger with a similar cash incentive to the "receiving" government to grant them citizenship.
apdld
"ship all the oldies out"... explain the sentence, it sounds very disrespectful to the elderly and ignorant in general.
And who's going to be next in your opinion after "all the oldies" have gotten out of here? The sick, weak and the poor?

Login

SCMP.com Account

or