• Thu
  • Jul 24, 2014
  • Updated: 7:27am
NewsHong Kong
EDUCATION

Hong Kong trails rival Singapore in students' English skills

While Hong Kong has stressed bilingualism as a key goal, the city falls far behind Singapore in English literacy, with no remedy in sight

PUBLISHED : Sunday, 03 February, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Monday, 04 February, 2013, 10:22am

Every Saturday afternoon Cindy Tse takes her eight-year-old son to a private class near his school, where he joins other children for two hours under the guidance of an expatriate teacher.

"We want to increase his chances of listening and talking in English, as he goes to a Chinese-medium school," says the doting mother.

Many others like her spare no efforts in brushing up their children's language skills - and not just in English. Demand for Putonghua teachers is soaring as China's clout in the global economy increases.

Since 2009, the Education Bureau has delivered HK$10 million under a special grant to 47 schools to promote six languages other than Chinese and English - Urdu, Hindi, German, Japanese, French and Spanish.

About 15,000 people study French in Hong Kong in primary, secondary and tertiary education classes, with private tutors, at private centres or at the Alliance Francaise - a global institute promoting French language and culture. The French consul said last year that French had become Hong Kong's fourth language.

But while it has long been a key goal of the government to foster bilingualism in Hong Kong, the language skills of the city's young people have become a cause of significant concern.

Hong Kong compares favourably with other countries in the region in terms of language skills, but it trails far behind its key rival, Singapore.

Singapore has a much higher proportion of people who are literate in English, according to Amy Tsui Bik-may, chair professor of language and education at the University of Hong Kong.

As its economy grew in recent decades, the government of the Lion City made a conscious effort to popularise the use of English. In 1980, the proportion of Singaporean families who used English as their main language in the home was just 8 per cent. That figure had risen to 23 per cent in 2000 and stood at 48 per cent in 2010.

In comparison, according to last year's census, the proportion of Hong Kong's population which use English as the main language at home is just 3.5 per cent. About 45 per cent of Hongkongers used English sometimes while speaking Cantonese as their main language, Tsui said.

And it isn't just the proportion of people speaking more than one language; language standards have also become a cause for concern, especially since the introduction of the government's mother-tongue teaching policy in 1997. The policy saw all but a handful of secondary schools required to switch to teaching all classes in Cantonese, rather than English, and is cited as having encouraged more local parents to seek places for their children at international schools.

The government changed direction in 2009, when it announced that from the 2010-11 academic year, schools would be allowed to teach a class in English as long as 85 per cent of students in a class are in the top 40 per cent of their age group academically.

It ended the strict segregation of schools into Chinese and English streams and allowed Chinese-medium schools to set aside a quarter of their lesson time for "extended learning activities conducted in English".

But the changes are not sufficient to remedy the declining standard of English.

As an international city, we have no choice but to use English as the medium of instruction

Jao Ming, chairman of the Eastern District Parent-Teacher Association, echoes a common concern about the lack of a stimulating linguistic environment in the territory. "Learning in a person's native language is a good idea, but you need support measures in society to ensure that students are well exposed to English outside school; there aren't such measures."

His daughter, who learned in Chinese, struggled to cope when studying at university, where lessons are often delivered in the lingua franca. "She often studied until very late at night to catch up. She had to make double the effort in her first year and her results in that year were not good either."

The issue of medium of instruction has long been divisive, a subject of debate among those who favour mother-tongue teaching on the grounds that it will help students learn and others who insist on the value of learning in English in a globalised world.

Anita Poon Yuk-kang, associate professor in Baptist University's department of education studies, is a staunch advocate of using English as the medium of instruction.

She sees the idea of "fine tuning" the mother-tongue teaching policy as being inadequate for achieving effective bilingual education. Hong Kong has a long way to go, she feels, in raising the level of proficiency in both English and Chinese. She calls for the creation of a holistic curriculum based on studies of the common threads in teaching the two languages.

"I don't see bilingual education coming yet. It requires long-term planning and funding from the government, but that is not happening. As an international city, we have no choice but to use English as the medium of instruction," she says.

James Lam Yat-fung, chairman of the Subsidised Secondary Schools Council, agrees that Hong Kong is not a bilingual society, at least on the surface.

"It lags far behind Singapore," he said. "We have more Chinese than English signs here. There isn't the linguistic environment here. Employers in the commercial sector and universities have worries about students' English standards."

There isn't the linguistic environment here. Employers in the commercial sector and universities have worries about students' English standards

More than 15 years after the handover, students appear to be more comfortable learning in Chinese. The typical student, Lam says, will want lessons to be taught in Chinese even when they are relying on an English-language textbook. "They don't want to translate ideas into English, or vice versa," he explains.

In the past three years, about 70 per cent of Form Three students achieved basic competency in English in territory-wide assessments carried out by the Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority. But among the problems identified was students' lack of the topic-specific vocabulary they needed to help them express their ideas.

There were wide variations in the standards of the bottom 30 per cent who failed to meet the benchmark, Lam added.

In the Chinese-medium school where he works, at which English is used to teach maths and science subjects in some classes in junior forms, the changes to the policy on medium of instruction have helped increase students' confidence about learning in English.

Still, in last year's maiden Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education examination, only 0.7 per cent of candidates reached the highest level, 5**, in English; only 0.8 per cent achieved it in Chinese.

A report issued by the University Grants Committee in 2010 on aspirations for the higher education sector urged institutions to make renewed efforts to ensure and enhance students' bilingual (Chinese and English) and trilingual (Cantonese, Putonghua and English) abilities.

Grasping two languages is never easy, particularly in a predominantly Chinese society like Hong Kong. Lam believes there must be more research into how best to enhance students' acquisition of both languages. He echoes Tsui's concern about the quality of teaching.

Lack of exposure to a different language environment has undermined the standards of serving English teachers and those under training, he says.

"Some are not good at communicating in the language. To attract more talent to the profession, the government should review the entry-level salary for potential teachers with English-related qualifications from other fields. It is a matter of whether it wants Hong Kong to be an open or inward looking place."

For now, the burden is perhaps on parents to expose their children to more English - on top of Putonghua. But they'd better make sure their children are building the right foundation to use the language, rather than merely getting prepared for examinations.

"There is so much drilling with exam papers in class due to the exam-oriented system in Hong Kong, something that seems hard to change," said Jao.

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

19

This article is now closed to comments

HK-Explorer
It sounds nice and Hong Kong like to send your child to a Cantonese school (easier). But as others mention outside of Hong Kong there is not any advantage to knowing Cantonese. No HK business that deals with anything more than restaurants will want a Cantonese only speaking staff and that will only be because they pay them less money. Kids and adults should be working hard to learn mandarin and English or they will be left behind. (for some reason most parents are not pushing this like others in Asia are). I think most people in HK speak worse English than their maids. (who will get the jobs in the future?).
bonbon
As an English teacher, here is my two cents regarding the English proficiency of Hong Kong students. On one hand, we have the international school students who have little problems speaking and listening to English yet have little understanding of grammar rules such as tenses and prepositions. On the other hand, the local school students have a better grasp of grammar but cannot speak or listen well. I have primary 6 students who go to pretty good local schools who cannot answer the question 'where do you go to school?'. There are plenty of so called Native English Teachers (i.e., teachers who look a certain way) who cannot teach English because they don't have much relevant training or education to start with. I agree with some posters that unless English is part of the mainstream culture, there's little hope that the level of English proficiency will improve. In addition, I have taught mainland students who are much keener than Hong Kong students to learn English. By the way, English grammar books produced by Singaporean publishers have much higher standard than those published in Hong Kong. I also blame the lack of proficiency on the fact that the local kids have to learn traditional Chinese (writing) which is used only in Hong Kong and some parts of China. Why spend so much time and energy on something that has only limited use?
lamlm38
exactly.. why do they teach Cantonese in HK? should learn from SG experience.. outside HK Cantonese is as useful as **** on boards.. get rid of all the dialects just Chinese and English.. that should give HK a competitive edge in the future.. i mean in SG we even speak Malays..
kristian.nilsson@dfat.gov.au
Because Cantonese is the language spoken in Hong Kong... SG experience means heritage and language lost. Difficulties communicating the elderly. "Native speakers" of a mish mash of a tonne of different languages. There is value in gaining fluency in the mother tongue... cantonese in order to then master additional languages
syracuse37
I agree, a language is not only a tool of expression it defines a culture, a way of thinking, the personality of the members of the community. Getting rid of the local language just for the purpose of efficiency is treating humans like pure economic pawns ridding them out of their culture, expression and what make them Unique. I come from Quebec Canada, where we speak french and fought to keep it alive while surrounded by English. It would be much more efficient to learn spanish or Chinese but this language makes us who we are. I am proud of HK people for standing tall and straight and keeping alive their language and culture while the CPC does all he can to crush it. HK people need to improve their english skill to communicate will all culture ( german, italian, spanish, greek, french, russian) who all learn english to do the same, they also need to improve chinese to make their economy grow in the east but they should never give up their language.
johnfra
Not too many people are surprised at this. If the Singaporeans would stop using the "La", they'd probably rank even higher in their English skills. Come to think of it, Hong Kong people don't even speak that well in Chinese, using uneducated vernacular and Cantonese TV-speak and spiced every few words with the odd English word. If they are not allowed to use words such as "Yau Mo Kau Chor" they couldn't even string together a proper sentence.
jonathanmcw
Language as a tool – as long as one is proficient enough in the use of it to get a message across – I would care less on the side of speaking with an accent, or whether or not every word are well put together with great grammatical sense. The key is though – if the influx of ideas from the outside world has become less "relevant" to the local community, then the language will perhaps find itself gradually vanish away, as the world it connects to is no longer exerting strength in shaping minds over that place. Let's blame everyone for being so accustomed to our linear-thinking media, a self-containing cultural bubble of its own. Shall we?
Of course, it also has to do with how comfortable for someone to tolerate a wider range of views, especially when the outside world is not dreaming the same world with ambition...
grolschsipper
While I find it interesting to see a comparison between Singapore and Hongkong, it would also be interesting to look at Taiwan, where most people speak both Taiyu and Guoyu Chinese, much like the Philipines where, regardless of social status, it can be difficult to find someone who doesnt speak English.
As for models for HK to follow or at least look at, I have been most impressed with Beirut (yes, Beirut), a truly trilingual capital of a trilingual nation. Absolutely everyone speaks English, French and Arabic, flawlessly. Waynewing is right, it is pointless to compare HK'sEnglish with Singlish when opportunity exists to learn from quiet leaders like The Lebanon and Canada's Quibec.
lamlm38
Taiwan is not a good comparison.. HK doesnt need to emphasize their Cantonese b'cause HK would not b an 'independent country' in any foreseeable future :)
fuminchu
Not only does Hong Kong have a problem with English deficiency, it is also dangerously lacking in Mandarin proficiency. English is the international language of science but, Mandarin is now the East-Asian language of business.
By the way, Hong Kong has not right to mock Singlish, when standard Hongkie pronunciation for LV is 'elo wee', the letter z is 'ezed', Dior is 'de aw', the letter r is 'alo', etc...
waynewing
I just don't understand how could someone who pronounces THREE as FREE be arrogant enough to laugh at another who pronounces it as TREE.
waynewing
Quite a comedy to watch Singlish mocked by Honglish while Honglish being mocked by Chinglish. Why not you guys stop soliciting excuses? It certainly won't help to make your English more proficient. Wanna excel at sth? Practice more!
Oh, and are you seriously proud of the 'accentless' Honglish? May I ask do you still remember when is the last time you had a conversation with a HKner? It probably sums it up for HK nowadays - always find someone else you deem as even 'worse' to keep complacent instead of trying to make any improvement to catch the 'better'
eatw
I just have to agree with Peter Weir. Yes, it's true that you can get by smoothly and easily in Singapore but their Singlish is painful to the ears! They do speak it and seem to be so proud of their 'fluency' but oh no, their diction / intonation are just rather awful. It's sad but true that HK's English standard has seen a drastic decline after 1997, yet when we speak it we don't have that horrible mangled grammar and funny accents that are so distinctive as the Sinaporeans. HK govt must do something to bring our English standard up, and the first step is to get really competent teachers who speak and teach well. Native teachers are, on the face of it, and seemingly, the best option, yet do bear in mind that not all native teachers know how to teach well. That leaves us to ponder why those born in the 50s, 60s and 70s speak far better English than what we now hear in the 80s 90s and the newest batch churned out from local schools. When HK was still a British colony, we got massive chances to read, speak and write in English, and all govt documents and other official notices / circulars were bilingual. Schools had had better English teachers coz you really had to be up to par when you were hired as an English teacher, unlike now we can hear so many terrible tales of those so-called English teachers in elite schools not even knowing how to teach the right diction and having inadequate grasp of intonation, let alone teaching the parts & figures of speech proficiently.
low_cn
Yes, while Singlish may sound painful to the hears, English is the first language of many Singaporeans and they do write well. This is important in the commercial world.
manivest
The problem is government changing policies whenever there is compliant. Nothing can be achieve if there is no time for the policies to mature.
dm.maret
English is the current global language of science. The most prestigious scientific journals for publishing research reports are English-language journals (i.e. "Science" and "Nature" are two such journals). Even if your university lab staff work in a non-English environment, researchers still need to keep up-to-date with current scientific reports published in these English-language journals. Translation costs are usually considered to be too expensive, so knowing English is a plus. Also the global language for commercial airline pilots is English. This will not change in the near future. So, whether one likes it or not, the English language is needed for important global activities, i.e. science and air pilot careers, to name just two of many.
kristian.nilsson@dfat.gov.au
You can't compare the two. Many Singaporeans speak (a creole form of) English as their first language and struggle with Chinese. Hong Kongers have Chinese (Cantonese) as their mother tongue and English as a second language. I agree with Peter Weir.
johnyuan
It is more important to master one language well than attempt to master two languages but fail in both. Parents and educators should spare the burden of those kids that couldn’t do well in learning a foreign language but make sure they are mastering their native language well. Spare no resources because it is an obligation.
peter8049@rocketmail.com
I guess I've been speaking to different people in Hong Kong and Singapore than those referred to in this article. I live in Vancouver but have travelled to Hong Kong extensively and to Singapore less so. I have always been impressed by the level of fluency in English of Hong Kong residents. Conversely, I have often been confused after chatting in English with a Singaporean because of their often mangled grammar and syntax and extensive use of slang. Although it is always good to improve one's skills in English, Hong Kong residents should be proud of their current abilities in English.
Peter Weir
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or