• Tue
  • Dec 23, 2014
  • Updated: 3:16pm
NewsHong Kong

Priests' plagiarism sees exodus from Anglican church

Some 17 families have left the Anglican diocese after St John's Cathedral confirms claim that priests are still using online sermons dishonestly

PUBLISHED : Sunday, 24 February, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Sunday, 24 February, 2013, 5:02am

St John's Cathedral appears to be fighting a losing battle against plagiarising priests - a practise that has already led 17 families of believers to leave the Anglican church.

A former parishioner at the Emmanuel Church in Pok Fu Lam, a St John's affiliate, said four priests were guilty of using sermons from the internet and preaching them as if they were their own.

He said they had been doing so for 18 months.

The Very Reverend Matthias Der, the new dean of the cathedral, confirmed that some priests had persisted with their plagiarism despite his warnings against the practice at his first meeting with them in September.

"There is still bad practice in some of the priests," Der said on Friday, without confirming the number of clergy involved.

"I told my clergy that any kind of use of outside sources needs to be attributed," Der said of the September meeting.

"I understand that when we do research, we will look at other people's writing, but if we are using direct quotes then we need to attribute them. Plagiarism is not acceptable."

Several priests are still failing to cite their sources. Der said: "When I learned of this a few weeks ago, I [again] made it clear to my colleagues that it was not acceptable."

The former parishioner, who had attended Emmanuel Church for almost a decade, said he left recently because of the dishonesty of the priests and the inaction of the church.

"It is very disappointing to see the extent of plagiarised sermons published on the websites of St John's Cathedral and Emmanuel Church, even though this was brought to the cathedral's attention 18 months ago," he said.

The church keeps an online audio archive of its sermons. It shows a number of priests have included direct quotes from sermons or church newsletters found online with no attribution of the original source.

The Sunday Morning Post contacted some of the priests accused of plagiarism, but they refused to comment.

Two of them told the Post to speak to the dean, while another denied the allegation.

Der said the priests accused of plagiarism "all have different reasons" for their actions.

He said he was surprised when he realised what was happening.

"I had heard of [plagiarism by priests] before, but I had never met anyone who had done it," he said.

Der said plagiarism called into question a person's honesty.

"If we borrow, we need to attribute and that is the part they didn't do," he said. "It's an unfortunate issue and it's not something I condone or support."

Der said he always advised his clergy to prepare original sermons.

"While we research and look at other sources, the sermons we deliver are meant to be from our own preparations," he said.

Referring to the departure of the 17 families because of the ongoing plagiarism by priests of the church, he said: "Losing a single parishioner pains me, but unfortunately that has happened.

"Under my watch, this is an issue I take seriously and I'm doing my best to amend it.

"I trust my colleagues will comply or there will be more serious consequences."


For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

Who cares, and why? Sermons are either worth listening to, or not. Why does it matter if a priest preaches someone else's words? Religious people love quoting what other people have said. How does quoting the source help? Is the congregation not able to make its own mind up about what it hears? If St Paul allegedly wrote it, it must be ok; but if someone wrote it online it's probably a bit dodgy?!
It must be telling that seventeen families, as opposed to individuals, have left Emmanuel but doubt that it was solely due to plagiarism by some clergy. As the youngsters in these families would scarcely understand "plagiarism" it sounds as if the report smacks of sensationalism
Urban kid
I am an Anglican and a parishioner of a church affiliated to St John's.
I have to say that whilst I do not condone plagiarism of any kind I do find your article very sensational. Anyway, it is clear that the matter is under investigation. So, let's leave it at that.
Priests, Anglican or Catholic, are just a lazy, bad lot, some of them anyway. WWJD? He wouldn't be nicking inspirational talks, wot others writ, that's for certain.
As always, there could be more to this than meets the eye. Methinks further investigation is required. Good story for a Sunday morning though.


SCMP.com Account