• Thu
  • Jul 24, 2014
  • Updated: 6:17am

Basic Law

The Basic Law was drafted as part of the Sino-British Joint Declaration covering Hong Kong after its handover to China on July 1, 1997. The joint declaration stated that Hong Kong would be governed under the principle of ‘one country-two systems’ and would continue to enjoy its capitalist system and individual freedoms for 50 years after the handover.

NewsHong Kong
POLITICS

Hong Kong deputy floated idea of screening mechanism for chief executive poll

Media storm over a possible screening mechanism broke out after remarks were attributed to someone said to represent Beijing’s views

PUBLISHED : Tuesday, 12 March, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Tuesday, 12 March, 2013, 5:56am

The storm over whether a screening mechanism should be set up to bar candidates not acceptable to Beijing from running in the 2017 chief executive election started quietly at a lunch hosted in Beijing by a veteran Hong Kong deputy to the National People's Congress on Saturday.

At the off-the-record gathering the deputy floated the view that the nominating committee which puts forward chief executive candidates for a popular vote could hold an internal vote to shortlist which candidates to put forward.

This could serve the purpose of filtering candidates the central government deemed unacceptable, the deputy said, offering a personal interpretation of Article 45, the relevant clause in the Basic Law.

The row broke out after Ming Pao Daily quoted the remarks on Sunday, attributing them to "an authoritative person close to the central government" and sparking speculation that the deputy was representing the views of the central government or testing the water for it. The lunch was said to be an off-the-record gathering and it was stressed that it was the deputy's personal interpretation of the Basic Law.

Politicians across the spectrum lined up to comment on the screening mechanism which was seen as a way to guarantee that the future chief executive would come from "patriotic forces".

It increased pressure on the Leung Chun-ying administration which has yet to launch a consultation on the 2017 electoral system. Leung's defeated rival, Henry Tang Ying-yen, elected yesterday as a member of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference standing committee, lost no time in adding to the pressure, calling for a consultation on the election as soon as possible.

But when asked whether he agreed with a screening mechanism, the former chief secretary said it was too early to talk about the detailed proposal.

The bone of contention is what is meant by "democratic procedures" and the role to be played by the committee in nominations of candidates

For those who have followed the debate on constitutional development in the past decade, the controversy is nothing new and the nomination mechanism is already stated in the Basic Law.

According to a decision by the National People's Congress Standing Committee in December 2007, universal suffrage will be allowed for the election of the chief executive in 2017 and the Legislative Council thereafter. Article 45 of the Basic Law calls for a "broadly representative" nominating committee to forward chief executive candidates for a popular vote in accordance with "democratic procedures".

A reliable source in Beijing said in 2007 that the nominating committee need not necessarily be the Election Committee that chose the chief executive in 2007 and last year. The source stressed the procedures should ensure the nominating committee made a collective decision on which candidates went forward.

The bone of contention is what is meant by "democratic procedures" and the role to be played by the committee in nominations of candidates. It is unclear if it would hold a vote among members to decide which candidates go forward, or whether a candidate who secures support from a certain number of nominating committee members will get an entry ticket.

Publication of the deputy's views struck a nerve in the wake of recent remarks by Yu Zhengsheng , a Communist Party Politburo Standing Committee member, who said it would be bad for Hong Kong and the country if "opposition forces" ruled Hong Kong after universal suffrage was attained.

 

Share

Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

4

This article is now closed to comments

norodnik
Just another Honkie zillionaire brown nosing the boys in Beijing....
HKSandyGray
What do you think?
a) It's essential to comment & maintain freedom of speech for the people of HK.
b) We should keep quiet!
c) I'd like to comment but I don't know what to say.
d) I'd like to comment but I'm scared it will affect my family situation / career.
e) I don't care or I can't make a real difference.
f) I'll comment if others do too.
HKSandyGray
So which is it? BEIJING INTERFERENCE IN BASIC LAW, FIST FIGHTS BY COMMUNISTS & DEMOCRATS V CONS & REPUBS FOR CHANGE OR JUST PLAIN STUPIDITY & GREED BY THOSE USING KOWTOW TO FEATHER THEIR OWN NESTS?
fearonjones
"bad for Hong Kong and the country if "opposition forces" ruled Hong Kong after universal suffrage was attained" ..... still the old class struggle mindset... hostile forces etc. Maybe China is not ready for democracy, and never will be, until these feudal notions of good and evil are finally laid to rest. A civilised democracy is a method by which power is shared and hopefully the 'common' good maintained and enhanced. No body, and nobody, can be all-powerful and the rights of all to argue for their version of what may achieve the common good are upheld. it is not 'national' educations that are in urgent need around the world, but 'citizenship education' that can help lift the mass of humanity to a higher democratic level.
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or