• Wed
  • Aug 20, 2014
  • Updated: 11:21pm
NewsHong Kong

Light pollution in Hong Kong 'worst on the planet'

It’s 1,200 times brighter over Tsim Sha Tsui than a normal dark sky, three-year study finds, posing a danger to health and wildlife

PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 20 March, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Wednesday, 20 March, 2013, 8:55am

Hong Kong is believed to be the world's worst city for light pollution, with levels in Tsim Sha Tsui 1,200 times brighter than a normal dark sky.

The findings were described as shocking by survey leader Dr Jason Pun Chun-shing, of the Department of Physics at the University of Hong Kong.

He said he could find nowhere else on earth as badly affected.

From the notorious hotspot of Tsim Sha Tsui to the remote Sai Kung countryside, the researchers found excessive brightness of varying degrees that scientists said could damage health and wildlife.

Unlike major cities elsewhere - including London, Frankfurt, Sydney and Shanghai - Hong Kong has no laws to control external lighting.

But Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing said he hoped a government task force on light pollution could come up with proposals for more "regulatory elements" for public discussion in the middle of this year.

He did not say if he meant legislation.

In the world's largest light pollution study, scientists collected more than five million brightness measurements at 18 monitoring stations over the past three years. They used an instrument known as a Sky Quality Meter installed on roofs. The worst reading was at the Space Museum in Tsim Sha Tsui from 8.30pm to 11pm, which was 1,200 times the International Astronomical Union standard.

Brightness started to dip after 11pm when lights gradually went out. Tsim Sha Tsui residents once threatened to take developers to court over excessive lights.

Even at the Astropark stargazing facility near High Island Reservoir - where most would expect a natural dark sky - the brightness was still 20 times the standard. Health specialists say light pollution could disrupt the biological clock and affect brain and hormone function.

Pun said that in some European cities like Madrid and Florence, the readings were normally below 100 times the standard.

He said energy-wasting signboards or spotlights that usually point upwards could generally be blamed in Hong Kong.

He added: "Lighting is supposed to provide safety and security for people's daily life. Lights are for human use and not for the sky. But what we see is that many lights are pointing to the sky."

Lighting is supposed to provide safety and security for people's daily life. Lights are for human use and not for the sky. But what we see is that many lights are pointing to the sky

Conservationists were alarmed by the reading at the Wetland Park in Tin Shui Wai at 130 times the standard.

Hong Kong Entomological Society chairman Yiu Vor said he feared the brightness would affect the breeding of fireflies, including the endemic bent-winged firefly, which relied on light signals to mate.

"They might not be able to notice the signals in a bright environment or they simply release the signal less frequently. This would affect their continuing survival." Yiu said insects that relied on moonlight to navigate could also be affected.

Pun said Hong Kong needed tougher measures to curb light pollution, instead of relying on voluntary technical guidelines.

Sydney requires all private illuminated signs to be scrutinised by the city council.

London also makes such nuisances a statutory offence carrying a fine or even imprisonment.


For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

Government is one of the worst offenders in remote areas with far too intense and unnecessary lighting at their 'secured' installations and on little-used public thoroughfares.
One example: the previously beautiful night-time sea view of Lantau Island across from Peng Chau is ruined perpetually by the totally unnecessary barrage of strong yellow flood lights illuminating the landing key (unused at night) and sea approaches of their explosives storage depot. This is a total waste of electricity and ruins the environment. For security purposes it more than adequate to only have these lights switched on automatically if and when infra-red and other sensors detect a possible intrusion. This would save thousands of dollars in electricity charges each month as well as returning tranquility to the Lantau green area. Viewed from Peng Chau this is currently an eyesore.
shortage of hospitals/worse health conditions/elderly people care/jobs/living standards/law and order/shortage of daily usage items even like baby milk/a big list of other problems. citizens legal rights are on high abuse in SAR and my repescted Dr Jason is worrying for lights thats the only/important issue in SAR which we should worry that much? All tax payers money SAR departments using for useless things there is no any improvments coming into SAR citizen's life day by day going worse
I agree with bbchkg.
Why can't we focus on fixing air pollution and pollution in the sea? Or problems with society.
361 complaints about light pollution seem pathetic compared to complaints about food safety and air pollution.
Hong Kong burns coal to generate electricity. Electrical lighting and even MTR all consume electricity and yet we are so easy to think they are clean. I don't. The light pollution contributes air pollution everyday in Hong Kong.
"The findings were described as shocking by survey leader Dr Jason Pun Chun-shing, of the Department of Physics at the University of Hong Kong"
Respected Dr Jason Pun > is this is the only problem hk have now ?
people are killing their love ones becuase of discreminating laws of SAR departments.people life is getting hand to mounth.citizens are begging for their legal rights and you are wasting time for these light surveys




SCMP.com Account