• Thu
  • Dec 18, 2014
  • Updated: 6:08am
NewsHong Kong

Six reclamation sites shortlisted to boost land reserves in Hong Kong

Reclamation schemes include a plan for an artificial island, but officials say proposals will do little to address city's housing needs

PUBLISHED : Thursday, 21 March, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Thursday, 21 March, 2013, 10:24am


  • For: 35%
  • Against: 62%
  • Don't care: 3%
21 Mar 2013
  • For
  • Against
  • Don't care
Total number of votes recorded: 728

The city's quest to reclaim more land from the sea is not going to help home buyers in the short term, government officials warned yesterday.

Five reclamation sites and plans for an artificial island have made the shortlist from 25 sites earmarked by the Development Bureau for a "strategic land reserve".

One of the sites, at Sunny Bay in north Lantau, could provide up to 100 hectares of land. But it lies directly under the airport flight path, meaning residential development is not an option.

A site at Siu Ho Wan - with a potential supply of up to 150 hectares - faces the same problem as it would lie under the proposed third runway.

Officials said the two sites could be ready for development as early as 2019, but the locations meant uses would be restricted. They said the aim of the strategic reserve was to fill gaps in the long-term land supply in time to take account of development needs and population growth.

The bureau is launching a three-month public consultation today on the six proposals.

A consultation exercise in 2011 concluded that Hongkongers were divided over reclamation, but that there was overall support to build up a land reserve.

Officials remain reluctant to say what these reserves could be used for without knowing the exact scale of each site.

"We want the public to tell us what their concerns are, and we will present to them the opportunities and challenges facing each site," said an official who did not want to be named.

We want the public to tell us what their concerns are, and we will present to them the opportunities and challenges facing each site

The official said the bureau hoped to convince the public of the need for funding to further study reclamation feasibility.

The five near-shore reclamation sites could provide a total of around 600 hectares. One of them - Lung Kwu Tan in Tuen Mun - could supply at least 200 hectares. Officials believe the Tuen Mun site is suitable for residential use despite its proximity to power plants.

"There are two chimneys at the coal-fired power plants. If the building height is restricted, residential uses might be feasible," said an official who preferred not to be named.

Another shortlisted site potentially fit for housing is at Ma Liu Shui, near the Sha Tin sewage treatment works, with a potential land supply of up to 60 hectares.

But development might hinge upon relocating the sewage plant to a nearby cavern, freeing about 28 hectares of land. Officials said this plan could take decades to materialise.

A site at Tsing Yi is capable of supplying 100 hectares but is already being targeted for a proposed container terminal. A decision on whether that will go ahead may be two years away.

Officials say the artificial island could provide between 1,000 and 2,000 hectares. They are eyeing a spot between west Hong Kong Island and east Lantau. And they said they would not rule out using the island to relocate facilities that cause pollution from urban areas.

Detailed studies on infrastructure such as road links were still needed.

To address environmental concerns, officials plan to conduct a cumulative impact study for reclamation sites in western waters, to see if these projects would overburden the area due to other infrastructure works either ongoing or being planned.

"If these studies show any problems, we can adjust the size of reclamation or fine tune their locations," the source said.

Alan Leung Sze-lun, conservation manager of WWF Hong Kong, welcomed the studies but urged officials to reveal more details. "This is the right direction to go in and it shows they are willing to face the problem," he said.



Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

This is classic Government manipulation. If they just went ahead and said that they wanted to build an artificial island then the majority would say no. So draw up a shortlist but one where the other sites all have major problems. Two sites right under flight paths, so not suitable for residential use (why are these on the shortlist?), one next to a coal-fired power station, one near a sewage plant that could take decades to develop and one already earmarked for a container terminal. What choice are we left with? A developers paradise, and an ecological disaster!
It's a waste because it will not be done to meet any present or future need. Instead it will occur so that there will be a new site for investors and speculators to invest their money. The reult will have no impoact on HK citizens' lives ecept for making property (a palce to live) more expensive.
The Sunny Bay and Siu Ho Wan sites are far enough away from the flight path (given the altitude the airplanes would be at those distances from the airport) that it is incredulous to make the claim that "residential development is not an option". For many years while Kaitak Airport was in operation, residential development flourished in areas underneath the flight path abated only by limitations on building height. Perhaps limiting the height of structures is a good thing anyway as it could reduce the enclosed feeling associated with closely clustered tall buildings and increase the sense of openness.
Develop the sites under the flight path for industrial use, while some of the old industrial sites in the city can be reclaimed and rezoned to residential. This may be too simple a solution!
Please think about why and how Singapore can enjoy less pollution and yet having double the space per person than HK?
Hey, they can build at inspiration lake and even reclaim more land near Disney and build there. Or extend discover bay all the way to Disneyland. Expand the Disney MTR line further so residents can use it. They could put about another 20 to 30 apartment buildings in. It is not under any flight path. Government owns the land and won't block anyone's view.
It will also make better use of the facilities such as MTR and roads. I can't believe the government recommends pointless choices and misses the perfect ones.
The administration has yielded to the pressure of solving the housing problem in many ways including reclamation. The shortlisted sites for reclamation attracted criticism as much as opposing views. The coastline in Ma Liu Shui displays its natural beauty and affords a wide and open seaview to all residents at Ma On Shan. The sewage site is big enough to cater for building a housing estate which can be as large as Taikoo Shing. Reclamation work done beyond the orginal coastline will cause a devastating damage. This is to be strongly objected.
Interestingly, the outer perimeter shown on the map for the proposed artificial island between Lantau and Hong Kong Islands contains about 8,000 hectares within its boundary. This is based on the 5 KM scale indicated and the measured radius of the circle. Perhaps the Officials who are "....eyeing a spot...." could narrow their focus a bit. Certainly a 1,000 to 2,000 hectare site could be defined more precisely. Unless their objective is some sort of blanket approval for the concept which can be later used to bully specific opposition. If I lived on Peng Chau I'd be nervous.
There are vast areas of Kowloon that simply need to be razed and redeveloped. Much better than claiming more land and incurring infrastructure costs.


SCMP.com Account