• Sat
  • Apr 19, 2014
  • Updated: 8:06pm

Edward Snowden

30-year-old American Edward Snowden, a contract employee at the National Security Agency, is the whistleblower behind significant revelations that surfaced in June 2013 about the US government's top secret, extensive domestic surveillance programmes. Snowden flew to Hong Kong from Hawaii in May 2013, and supplied confidential US government documents to media outlets including the Guardian

NewsHong Kong
SECURITY

Edward Snowden: Classified US data shows Hong Kong hacking targets

Top-secret US government records shown to Post by whistle-blower give details of computer IP addresses hacked by NSA in HK and mainland

PUBLISHED : Friday, 14 June, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Saturday, 15 June, 2013, 8:23pm

Classified US government data shown to the South China Morning Post by whistle-blower Edward Snowden has provided a rare insight into the effectiveness of Washington's top-secret global cyberspying programme.

New details about the data can be revealed by the Post after further analysis of information Snowden divulged during an exclusive interview on Wednesday in which the former CIA computer analyst exposed extensive hacking by the US in Hong Kong and the mainland.

The FBI said yesterday it had launched a criminal investigation and was taking "all necessary steps" to prosecute Snowden for exposing secret US surveillance programmes.

FBI Director Robert Mueller told the House Judiciary Committee: "These disclosures have caused significant harm to our nation and to our safety. We are taking all necessary steps to hold the person responsible for these disclosures," he said.

Snowden, the man behind explosive leaks of information on the US government's Prism programme that collected phone and web data from its citizens, has pledged to stay in Hong Kong to fight any attempts by his government to have him extradited.

The detailed records - which cannot be independently verified - show specific dates and the IP addresses of computers in Hong Kong and on the mainland hacked by the National Security Agency over a four-year period.

They also include information indicating whether an attack on a computer was ongoing or had been completed, along with an amount of additional operational information.

The small sample data suggests secret and illegal NSA attacks on Hong Kong computers had a success rate of more than 75 per cent, according to the documents. The information only pertains to attacks on civilian computers with no reference to Chinese military operations, Snowden said.

"I don't know what specific information they were looking for on these machines, only that using technical exploits to gain unauthorised access to civilian machines is a violation of law. It's ethically dubious," Snowden said in the interview on Wednesday.

Snowden, who came to Hong Kong on May 20 and has been in hiding since, said the data points to the frequency and nature of how NSA operatives were able to successfully hack into servers and computers, with specific reference to machines in Hong Kong and on the mainland.

According to a New York Times report yesterday, US government lawyers, working with their counterparts in Hong Kong, are understood to have identified several dozen criminal offences with which Snowden could be charged under both Hong Kong and American laws. One of the targets Snowden revealed was Chinese University, home to the Hong Kong Internet Exchange which is a central hub of servers through which all web traffic in the city passes.

A university spokeswoman said yesterday that staff had not detected any attacks to its "backbone network".

Yesterday's revelation that the US was secretly hacking computers in Hong Kong and on the mainland sent shockwaves around the world and came just days after Snowden first exposed the Prism programme to The Guardian newspaper in Britain.

"The primary issue of public importance to Hong Kong and mainland China should be that the NSA is illegally seizing the communications of tens of millions of individuals without any individualised suspicion of wrongdoing," Snowden said. "They simply steal everything so they can search for any topics of interest."

Snowden's most recent job was as an NSA contractor with Booz Allen Hamilton but he was fired shortly after he identified himself on Sunday as the source of one of the most significant leaks in US history.

Formal charges are the first necessary step that would prompt an extradition request to the Hong Kong government.

Snowden could find himself at the centre of a diplomatic storm between Washington and Beijing as he has explicitly chosen to seek refuge in Hong Kong, a move that will test the Sino-US relationship. He said he had chosen Hong Kong because he believed the city's semi-autonomous status and rule of law would protect him from attempts to extradite him to the US.

It is understood that Snowden arrived in Hong Kong after leaving his home in Hawaii, telling his girlfriend that he would be away for a few weeks.

He stayed at the Mira Hotel in Tsim Sha Tsui before checking out on Monday and has been in hiding since.

Snowden said he has not spoken to his family since the revelations were made and lives in constant fear for his own safety. 

 

Share

Related topics

15

This article is now closed to comments

fearonjones
Quite right. Legally of course, wrong, but ethically no doubt, right. When law and morality collide choices have to be made, and morality should rule. Sometimes the law can be 'an ****' and must change, or be changed, as morality also changes over time in some respects. It cannot be right to mass harvest information about individuals without their consent or knowledge. This is a n important issue at any time, but especially so given the power of digital technology. Snowden needs our protection.
carmeledwin
The reason why we have a jury system is to let a person's peers decide. Even if a person has broken the law, however, if his/her peers deemed the case to be one where it be morally wrong to convict, they can and in theory enter a not guilty judgement. In this case, in my humble opinion, although Snowden did wrong to have stolen the information, it is immoral to send him back.
KwunTongBypass
Ok, Ok, Ok. Let's beat up really hard on the Americans. Agree. By the way, China's spies - ahh Internet security CENSORS does not need to 'hack' into Hong Kong computers, they are already connected to that building with the 50,000 spies - ahhh CENSORS - in Beijing by default!
Simon Berry
It is not Edward Snowden who should be under investigation but the persons who ordered and carried out the illegal hacking and violations of personal privacy and civil liberties.
Here's an idea - create an annual award called the "Snowden" to be awarded to the individual who has done the most to defend and promote civil liberties.
preventallwas.org
Edward Snowden’s actions prove that official and military secrets will never again be as covered. Instant Digital Information Technology ruins the old canopy of secrecy over national governments and military establishments. This has valid implications for such age-old, planned but dreadful events as war. Can any military power sustain them?
Military force against any enemy is soon noticed by the world and weakened by protests. Results of USA’s vast military assets against a rag-tagged Taliban or the sharing of vital industrial and military secrets with China come to mind.
Instant Digital technology use is simple and electronic spying will grow. NOTHING CAN STOP IT! Even USA’s gov., and perhaps others, utilizes this reality against their own citizens. THEREFORE POSSESSION OF OVERWHELMING MILITARY POWER IS INCREASINGLY USELESS AND UTTERLY WASTEFUL FOR NATIONAL ECONOMIES.
The above stresses need for the very efficient and enforceable global war prevention measures detailed in my book, Unchecked, They’ll Kill Us All. THE ENFORCEMENT NEEDS NO ARMED FORCES FOR EFFECT!
However war advocacy continue. They use more deadly weapons; swell global insecurity, refugee crises and civilian trauma.
Since national leaders who create wars are protected from the ensuing mayhem (their soldiers die instead), the clear limitations on war by the technologies and the new ideas in the book are conveniently ignored.
So, many more Edward Snowdens’ or Bradley Mannings' will manifest.

Pages

Login

SCMP.com Account

or