• Sat
  • Jul 12, 2014
  • Updated: 5:02pm
NewsHong Kong

Rubbish recyclers may get subsidies in waste policy overhaul

New committee will be tasked with rethinking rubbish management as trash crisis looms

PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 03 July, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Wednesday, 03 July, 2013, 7:59am


  • Yes: 84%
  • No: 16%
3 Jul 2013
  • Yes
  • No
Total number of votes recorded: 393

Subsidies for the city's flagging waste recycling industry are an option that the government will study, the environment minister says, in a possible major policy shift to support such businesses.

The idea was unveiled yesterday, as two of the administration's proposals - a HK$7 billion extension of the Ta Kwu Ling landfill and a HK$35 million study of expansion at the Tuen Mun facility - received approval from a Legislative Council subcommittee.

A new high-level steering committee, to be chaired by Chief Secretary Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor, would examine whether and how to offer the subsidies, said Secretary for the Environment Wong Kam-sing. Lam has been lobbying directly for lawmakers' support on the landfills.

The committee, to be formed within months, will look at rubbish management on all fronts, from land use and planning to government procurement and manpower to help the recycling industry. In particular, it will look at whether the trade should be subsidised.

"The committee will study the possibility of offering regular subsidies to support the recycling industry," Wong said. "In the long run, we will not rule out setting up a recycling fund."

The committee will study the possibility of offering regular subsidies to support the recycling industry. In the long run, we will not rule out setting up a recycling fund

He said any planned subsidy must be cost-effective for the whole of society.

A source familiar with the situation described the move as possibly a "major policy shift". "The committee may be only a start. But it marks the government's first ever recognition that recycling businesses could be subsidised."

A lot of questions had to be studied before any concrete plan could be decided on, the source added, addressing such issues as who should be eligible, what the target recycling rate and level of subsidy should be, and whether to include imported waste.

If subsidies were provided, the government should also take the opportunity to upgrade the industry, which is now engaged mainly in waste export, they said.

Last year, the city recovered about three million tonnes of waste, 99 per cent of which was exported, generating revenue of HK$8.2 billion.

Wong floated the option at a meeting of the Legislative Council public works subcommittee that voted in support of the two landfill proposals. Both plans will be tabled to the Legco Finance Committee on July 12 for final funding approval.

A third extension plan, for the Tseung Kwan O landfill, was dropped last week because of strong opposition, but is expected to be resubmitted next year.

Wong Yuk-chun, who operates a recycling plant that turns food waste into fish feed, welcomed the new focus on recycling, but expressed reservations.

"It is interesting to see the government has been paying unscrupulous contractors to collect plastic waste and dump it in landfills," he said. "But we who collect food waste locally and reprocess it into a final product … receive not a single cent."

He cited high land rents and difficulties in waste collection as obstacles to their operations.

Both Federation of Trade Unions and Labour Party lawmakers have been asking for a recycling fund if they are to support landfill extensions.

Celia Fung Sze-lai, from Friends of the Earth, said subsidies should target the rubbish that the market had the least incentive to collect and recycle, such as plastics, food and wood.



For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive


This article is now closed to comments

Incinerator bag houses and flues cannot control PM1 and PM2.5 RSP heavy metal emissions that are the killers.
The previous ENB minister left an air pollution + waste disaster for the incumbents.
His abject failure to act means HK now needs an immediate (less than 3 years) gasification treatment option instead of dinosaur incineration 7+ years + JR appeals hence. The obvious treatment site w/ existing marine waste delivery train at Tsang Tsui has been allocated as a columbarium. SENT will receive no more food waste but when it closes necessitates MSW transport from the entire East Kowloon for disposal. West Kowloon TS is already at capacity. Haul times + costs will double or 3x as will vehicle generated air quality problems unless E KLN waste can be barged. To minimise this problem KLN Bay TS will have to reopen to truck 2000 TPD to NENT. However this is opposite the new cruise liner terminal which displaced all the typhoon moorings in Kai Tak typhoon shelter SENT will need replacement by a major transfer station capable of dealing with 2700 TPD destined for WENT.
20,000+tpd public fill material construction waste from building + demolishing things handled by CEDD is currently being delivered along Wan Po Rd Area 137 + then shipped to China
(is that considered part of the recycling 48% number quoted by EPD ?)
Fuzzy numbers indeed !


SCMP.com Account