ANIMAL RIGHTS

Outrage as cat killer gets just 3 months' jail

PUBLISHED : Saturday, 03 August, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Saturday, 03 August, 2013, 8:29am
 

Poll

  • Yes
  • No

You have already voted.

  • Yes 32
  • No 68
3 Aug 2013
Total number of votes recorded: 298

A three-month jail term handed out yesterday for strangling a cat is "disgracefully light" and should be appealed, animal rights activists say.

The sentence was criticised as unfit punishment for construction worker An Haizhou's actions - he tied a string around the cat's neck in Tsuen Wan in May, dragged it around and beat it with a stick until it died.

The offence warrants up to three years in jail and a HK$200,000 fine under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Ordinance, revised in 2006.

Civic Party lawmaker Claudia Mo Man-ching asked the Department of Justice to launch an appeal against the sentence by Tsuen Wan Court. She said she would also write to Secretary for Justice Rimsky Yuen Kwok-keung to request an appeal.

Magistrate Raymond Wong Kwok-fai, in passing sentence, said the jail term reflected the severity of the offence and An's not-guilty plea. Asked about the possibility of an appeal, the department said: "We will study the reasons for [the] sentence and the case report of the prosecutor to determine whether any follow-up action is called for."

An, 48, worked in Zhaoqing , Guangdong, as a government officer before relocating to Hong Kong in 2009 and taking up a construction job.

On May 30, he tied a nylon string around the neck of a 1½-year-old cat at Yi Pei Square Playground, the court heard earlier. He then dragged the cat back and forth using the string and hit it with a wooden stick when it tried to run towards him.

A witness called the police. He saw An stand beside the dying cat, pick it up and put it into a plastic bag, the court heard. The witness described An as folding the bag "like an envelope" and putting it on a bench.

Police arrested An as he left the scene. He pleaded not guilty to one count of animal cruelty and was convicted after a trial.

Animal lovers lambasted what they called an inadequate sentence of three months' jail. Mo suggested a reason for the sentence could be that courts had to rule according to precedents dating back to legislation that was unrevised before 2006, which allowed for a maximum penalty of only half a year's jail.

Concern group Animal Protectors protested outside court yesterday. An activist who described the sentence as "disgracefully light" said: "How does our judiciary weigh the loss of a life?"

 

Share

Send to a friend

To forward this article using your default email client (e.g. Outlook), click here.

Enter multiple addresses separated by commas(,)

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.