• Wed
  • Nov 19, 2014
  • Updated: 3:32pm
NewsHong Kong
SMUGGLING

What to do with stockpile of seized ivory remains a dilemma for government

PUBLISHED : Sunday, 18 August, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Sunday, 18 August, 2013, 3:56am
 

More than six months after the government scrapped plans to incinerate its ever-growing stockpile of illicit ivory, conservation officials are still struggling to deal with the estimated 16 tonnes of elephant tusks seized since 2008.

New figures show that 500kg of ivory has been given to schools for educational purposes since the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department decided donations would be a good way to dispose of the contraband.

But with just 3 per cent of the inventory leaving government hands this way, questions have been raised over whether school donations are the best answer as more ivory is seized, placing further pressure on the storage and security of the tusks.

Last year, members of the Endangered Species Advisory Committee rejected incineration and in February, the government agreed - even though this went against its own finding that incineration was an effective way to get rid of the ivory.

Committee chairman Paul Shin Kam-shing said he would be happy to return to the issue if the department pushed for it.

"I can't recall an urgent sentiment among members on the matter and I don't feel there's an urgency to look into the issue again," Shin said.

The group met a fortnight ago and discussed the most recent seizure on August 7 of more than 1,000 tusks, the fourth shipment of ivory intercepted this year.

"Now that it's on the agenda, people can raise it again," Shin said, adding that he would welcome a more thorough review of alternative disposal methods.

He said that as a committee member for eight years and chairman for the past two, ivory had not been discussed much.

Katherine Ma Miu-wah, one of the members who rejected the incineration plan, said it was a sensitive topic.

"The first thought was what a waste to incinerate and destroy something which is supposed to be valuable," Ma said. "Emotionally, it was difficult to accept."

Ma, who is no longer on the committee, said donating ivory to schools was not the ideal answer either.

"Some schools may not want to take it because it's too big and precious," she said. "Having ivory in the corridor of a school sounds weird and it's not too educational, is it?

"In a way it's paradoxical, a Catch-22 situation. You want to preserve the ivory but it promotes cruelty. But to incinerate it, people feel it would be such a waste. Unless there's a better option, keeping it is a safe way to allow more time to think it through."

The School of Chinese Medicine at Baptist University is one of the 140 schools to have received ivory specimens this year.

The school's associate dean, Professor Zhao Zhong-zhen, is a member of the advisory committee, and said through a spokeswoman that his role was to promote the conservation of Chinese-herbal-medicine resources and ensure that there was a "sustainable supply". Zhao would not speak directly, while another member, Dr Chiu Sein-tuck from the Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden, said ivory was "too sensitive" to discuss.

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
4

This article is now closed to comments

chaz_hen
What a bunch of total idiots. Of course they should incinerate the tusks! It's called a LESSON to those that paid money up front for the purchase and smuggling of illegal contraband!
That this Katherine Ma should dare say it was emotionally hard to accept that something "valuable" should be destroyed is utterly laughable, amazing and shows her lack of depth!
It's only valuable to a few selfish people that put items like this on a pedestal to show off their bad taste in wealth and create an industry of killing endangered species and upending ecosystems.
The same kind of anachronistic simpletons that covet shark fin soup, bear bile and deer antlers as "health remedies" or "gourmet food".
LydiaLod
cha_hen, I agree. Burn the Ivory. Athough they feel it would be a waste to destroy it, putting it to "good use" would simply justify it's "black market value".
sontan0917
so simple just make use of it. many things are made from ivory. just make those products, sell them and donate that money to poor in hong kong and other poor countries.
tmctavish
A "Dilemma" - You must be kidding? How on earth is it "a waste" to incinerate the confiscations from global slaughter??? Do we keep the teeth fillings from murder victims?. Do we keep the cocaine from drug hauls? By "waste" does she mean she is going to resuscitate and resurrect the Elephants and return their tusks to them or is she meaning the monetary value of the confiscated Tusks? Obviously it is the latter! In which case this 2 faced person has no right to be holding a responsible conservation position or to even comment on conservation issues! Where do these greedy crazy people come from and how on earth has this individual ever been permitted on the Endangered Species Advisory Committee???? I am glad that they no longer are. It seems there are greedy people in all forms and those who wish to keep a monetary value on our wildlife, no matter the consequences... Disgraceful!

Login

SCMP.com Account

or