• Mon
  • Dec 22, 2014
  • Updated: 10:21am
Occupy Central
NewsHong Kong
POLITICS

‘Silent Majority’ takes vocal stance in fight against Occupy Central

Two-week-old force against Occupy Central warns of PLA intervention while running its second round of ads blasting civil disobedience

PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 21 August, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Wednesday, 21 August, 2013, 4:40am
 

A new group set up two weeks ago has emerged as the leading force against Occupy Central, launching aggressive attacks on the pro-democracy campaign.

One of its convenors warned yesterday that the planned acts of civil disobedience could lead to "anarchy" and "intervention by the People's Liberation Army".

Occupy Central might be 10 times larger. Will the 28,000-strong police force be able to control the scene? Can the campaign organisers guarantee it will not end up in riots?
‘Silent Majority’ Ad campaign run 

Organisers of Occupy Central countered that their actions would remain peaceful and non-violent, and rebuffed suggestions that their plan to blockade Central district next summer would end in bloodshed or rioting.

The Silent Majority for Hong Kong, formed on August 8 with 40 members, has 10,000 "likes" on its Facebook page. Occupy Central has 37,000 "likes" on its page.

Yesterday, the group ran full-page print advertisements criticising Occupy Central - its second lot of ads in major Chinese-language newspapers in a week.

The latest ads warned that the Occupy Central blockade could mirror the chaos that broke out in Mong Kok on August 4 involving 3,000 people - who backed either the police or a teacher who had hurled verbal abuse at officers.

"Occupy Central might be 10 times larger," the ads read. "Will the 28,000-strong police force be able to control the scene? Can the campaign organisers guarantee it will not end up in riots?"

The two groups also clashed at their first open forum, resulting in a war of words between Robert Chow Yung, one of Silent Majority's six convenors, and Occupy Central organiser Benny Tai Yiu-ting, that lasted over three hours. The forum was hosted by Wisdom Hong Kong, a new think tank whose vice-chairman Dr Chow Pak-chin backed Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying in his election campaign.

"The civil disobedience could eventually take Hong Kong into a state of anarchy," Robert Chow said. "I wonder if the police will handle it. If not, the government will have to admit the city is ungovernable, prompting the PLA out of their barracks. Is that the price Hongkongers are willing to pay for universal suffrage?"

Reverend Chu Yiu-ming, another Occupy Central organiser, said he had never seen any riots or bloodshed in his 30-year fight for democracy. "In 1989, when a million people marched in protest, there was not so much as a piece of rubbish on the streets."

Tai said: "Hongkongers have had two bounced cheques for universal suffrage, in 2007 and 2012, from Beijing. This time we have to give advance warning so the 2017 pledge will be fulfilled."

Separately, after a meeting with the Democratic Party, National People's Congress Standing Committee member Rita Fan Hsu Lai-tai said she would convey its message to Beijing about introducing universal suffrage for the 2017 chief executive election during her next visit to the capital.

 

Share

Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
3

This article is now closed to comments

henleyhk
These so-called silent-majority dinosaurs clearly lack testicular fortitude. If achieving the right to universal suffrage granted to us in the Basic Law requires anarchy and the intervention of the PLA, then so be it. Thank goodness the fight against fascism in the 1930s did not depend on the likes of these people to defend our freedoms! Needless to say, I hope neither Occupy Central nor the state resorts to violence to enforce its will. The difference, however, is that violence is all the state ultimately has. Occupy Central, like Ghandi before them, have People Power and morality.
chaz_hen
This "Silent Majority" seems to be taking their cues from Rev. Jerry Falwell's "Moral Majority" group in the US that were proponents of basically going back to the '50s...the 1850s...where women, minorities and homosexuals had no rights and democracy was for a select few land owners only.
johnh
"violence is all the state ultimately has"
Well said, that's government in a nutshell.

Login

SCMP.com Account

or