• Thu
  • Jul 24, 2014
  • Updated: 6:06am
NewsHong Kong
ON SECOND THOUGHT

Use the tools of democracy or risk losing them

Violence is not in the civic spirit of democratic politics and may imperil universal suffrage

PUBLISHED : Friday, 23 August, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Friday, 23 August, 2013, 3:22am

In recent weeks, a number of friends have expressed a deep concern to me: that the city seems to be sliding backwards, becoming a political jungle. They see confrontations spilling over into the streets. They fear violence will soon break out en masse.

These friends are not activists. Most of the time, they take only a casual interest in politics. They care more about whether they can walk the streets safely at night, whether traffic moves smoothly, whether local schools are good enough for their children and, increasingly, whether they can rely on public hospitals as their health refuge of last resort.

But they are people who truly call Hong Kong home. They did not leave the city even in the aftermath of the bloody crackdown in Tiananmen Square in 1989. They pay their taxes on time, toil diligently for their families, and vote quietly for the politicians they feel they should support.

None of them joined the massive march on July 1, 2003, but all felt proud that on that eventful day; not a single window was broken, not a single car was overturned and no one was known to have been hurt by other marchers. They were proud because they thought Hong Kong was unique in being so civilised. They were also proud because our police did not block the protest. Officers performed admirably, facilitating the smooth passage of the hundreds of thousands of demonstrators.

Now they are less sure. They fear the genie might be out of the bottle. They loathe acts of provocation and violence, whatever the cause. Yet they feel helpless to stop a downward spiral.

"It is a Hong Kong that now looks so alien to me," one of them remarked.

He is old enough to have lived through the 1967 riots and shared in the mass mourning over the deaths in Beijing in 1989. But he had never felt so depressed as now, he said.

This is a strong warning signal. When even decent and loyal supporters of the city begin to fear the threat of political violence, we must all take heed.

It would be naive to appeal to our "Lion Rock spirit" of the 1970s. Those times are gone.

Yet we can still appeal to our civil spirit, so well demonstrated in the July 1 march only a decade ago. Hongkongers collectively expressed their anger and frustration then. But we showed the world that we could do it in an orderly and peaceful manner. We proved to ourselves that the city was ripe for democracy, of which self-restraint and mutual respect are essential ingredients.

The Standing Committee of the National People's Congress decreed in December 2007 "that the election of the fifth Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in the year 2017 may be implemented by the method of universal suffrage". This was a major breakthrough in Hong Kong's democratisation. We must seize the opportunity and implement it, and continue to stand firm on the dual principles of self-restraint and mutual respect, lest the opportunity be snatched away.

Let cooler heads prevail, on all sides.

Lam Woon-kwong is an Executive Council member and former chairman of the Equal Opportunities Commission

 

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

This article is now closed to comments

henleyhk
The problem, Mr Lam, is that things have changed a lot since the July 1 march a decade ago. HK people see a government which appears beholden to HK's plutocrats and oligarchs, unaccountable. HK's political and constitutional arrangements are broken, dysfunctional and not fit for purpose, completely incapable of delivering on the legitimate aspirations of HK people for accountable government. People feel disillusioned, disaffected and disenfranchised. And ANGRY. You trumpet the NPC's promise of a CEO elected by universal suffrage in 2017; but everybody knows that only candidates approved by BJ will be able to stand and you expect HK people to be satisfied with that "democratic" charade?! Shame on you. Without a CEO freely elected and therefore accountable to EVERYONE, the government will continue to limp on without a legitimate mandate, and HK will remain introverted, self-absorbed and unable to progress. HK people need and deserve better. Get on with it, or stand aside!
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or