• Sun
  • Dec 21, 2014
  • Updated: 9:21am
NewsHong Kong
SOCIETY

It’s true, Hong Kong’s a better place to live than five years ago, report says

PUBLISHED : Thursday, 29 August, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Thursday, 29 August, 2013, 10:25am
 

Poll

  • Yes: 13%
  • No: 87%
29 Aug 2013
  • Yes
  • No
Total number of votes recorded: 661

Hong Kong appears to have become a better place to live compared to five years ago, an international think tank says in its annual report on 140 cities.

Worldwide, the city is ranked 31st in the latest "liveability" ratings - up 10 places from 2008, despite the world becoming a less habitable place in general, the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) said.

Hong Kong scored full marks for education, compared with 83.3 out of 100 for Singapore, which was up two places to 52.

However, City University economist Chan Yan-chong sounded a note of caution, pointing out that the report reflected only the opinions of English speakers. Each of the 140 cities rated were given a score out of 100 for each category, based on the judgment of the EIU's in-house analysts and in-city contributors. That meant the rankings relied on the perceptions of the unit's own analysts instead of being survey-based, Chan said.

EIU economist Edward Bell said the ranking "is geared towards the challenges for somebody not from that city to live there; what they would be anticipating and looking forward to if they move there".

He added: "Ratings reflect specific improvements in the quality [of living], or the deterioration in other cities."

The report considered more than 30 factors broadly grouped under stability, health care, culture and environment, education and infrastructure.

Melbourne, Australia, ranked first, with Vienna second and Vancouver third.

Hong Kong scored higher than Singapore in four of the five categories.

The city scored 92 for overall liveability, while Singapore scored 88.7.

"There is no objectivity [when comparing cities]; it always depends on who you ask," Chan said.

Both places scored 87.5 for health care.

Chan said Singapore's health care had been developed as an industry, so basic medical services and hospital beds were much more expensive than Hong Kong, which had one of the cheapest public medical services in the world.

Chan said pupils in Singapore were known for good exam grades; however, they were under more pressure than those in Hong Kong as they had four public exams - two in primary school and two in secondary school - before they even entered university.

 

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
24

This article is now closed to comments

Dai Muff
Education for English speakers is only decent if your company is giving you a grant to pay for your kids' education.
pbhawk
What a load of tosh; HK is more overcrowded, more polluted and more expensive than 5 years ago, and as for the standard of government......................
Dai Muff
I guess the problem with this survey is that the surveyed are expats on overseas terms who largely live in a cocoon, separate from the concerns and the problems of the rest of us.
Giwaffe
You have got to be kidding me. The authors of this study cannot possibly have lived in Hong Kong.
skywalker
Well, it is like comparing the blind and the lame with athletes. Having lived in SG and HK, I cannot really understand what the authors mean with "Culture". Both HK and SG are so much behind the moon compared to Melbourne, London, New York, Paris, Berlin, Barcelona, Madrid, etc.
Face the fact that English at a much more higher standard in SG than in HK and Education for "English speakers" (=western Expatriates?) is just so ridiculously expensive in both cities. Same as housing, this is just ridiculous in both places.
And regarding "Stability" I would rank HK 50 points perhaps and SG 95, because HK is de-facto not under its own rule, it is governed by the Chinese Communistic Party and they decide which rules to make and when to make them.
Greenwash
Is Hong Kong a better place to live than it was 5 years ago? Major categories: 1) Our your flat/living conditions better? 2) Is the air cleaner? 3) Is the education system better? 4) Is the health care system better? 5) Have you saved better for retirement? 6) Is the city better (parks, open space, cultural amenities)? 7) Is the government better? 8) Are your career prospects better?
For most people, most of these answers would be no, but you might be able to answer yes to a couple of these questions (perhaps career and money questions since you are 5 years older). Overall, Hong Kong is not better.
JC
Not sure if the writer can count.
From what I can see, Hk edges Singapore in two categories, there are two ties, and the Lion City ranks higher in infrastructure.
I'm very surprised that Singapore scored so lowly in education. If the survey was geared towards those are not from the city, then surely Singapore should score 101 if HK is a perfect score as it a greater variety of international schools than the territory. It also has a greater diversity of quality collaborations between its world class universities and those from the West
As culture and entertainment, maybe the Westerners can stand the fact that they can't buy **** from HMV here. But if you talk about the number of top international music acts that are passing through the city (from various genres), theatre and dance performances and the works, exhibitions, as well as intellectual discussions, I find it very strange that the Lion City scores so lowly as well.
The report clearly shows the laziness of the EIU in keeping up with the times in the Lion City.
HK is riding its luck on past perceptions, whilst Singapore suffers from its old reputation as a "nanny-state/cultural desert".
Its not a reflection on either city but the tardiness of those who conduct these rankings
luis.costa.33234571
Unbelievable. ...see last 5 year pollution evolution in hku's Hedley index: ****hedleyindex.sph.hku.hk/home.php
captam
This survey was obviously conducted in Sham Shui Po !
The most favourable aspect is that if this report was printed on paper, its recyclable.
meanbean
The EIU has surely not been on the HK's MTR when they did the ratings.
Nor have they taken a proper sniff of the HK's fresh air or visited the spacious homes with 3 generations "lego-ed" into the same compact "household."
The situation cannot be better today than what it was 5 years ago.

Pages

Login

SCMP.com Account

or