• Thu
  • Jul 31, 2014
  • Updated: 7:39am
NewsHong Kong
PROPERTY

Development minister Paul Chan just ‘testing water’ on country park flats

Paul Chan trying to force public thought on land supply, says source familiar with official position

PUBLISHED : Tuesday, 10 September, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Tuesday, 10 September, 2013, 9:00am

The development minister was just testing the water and forcing Hongkongers to think about realistic ways to boost land supply when he floated the idea of building flats on country park land, according to a person familiar with the government's position.

They said Paul Chan Mo-po's controversial suggestion was a "political gesture" to show the administration - under fire for failing to resolve a long-standing land-supply problem - was trying its best to address the issue.

During the exchange, someone mentioned that 70 per cent of Hong Kong's land is country parks, [and] in face of a shortage of land supply and a big housing demand ... can they not be developed at all?
Development minister Paul Chan

Meanwhile, a spokesman for the Development Bureau said yesterday that in quoting opinions expressed by some participants in seminars, Chan was merely sharing these views.

"Those views do not represent the government's stance," the spokesman said.

The clarification of Chan's intentions came as Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying maintained the government had not changed its policies on country parks.

Chan wrote on his blog on Sunday that society should discuss and explore the possibility of developing country parks - an idea he said had recently been raised in seminars - as more land would be needed to reach the target of building 470,000 flats in the next 10 years.

"During the exchange, someone mentioned that 70 per cent of Hong Kong's land is country parks, [and] in face of a shortage of land supply and a big housing demand ... can they not be developed at all?"

Chan's remarks were a radical departure from Leung's pledge when he was running for election as chief executive that country parks "should be protected from development as far as possible", a view he confirmed in an interview with the Post almost two years ago.

In an article in Ming Pao in 2009, Leung wrote that most grass-roots people did not have time to visit country parks and questioned what further expansion of parks meant for them.

The person familiar with the government's position admitted that it was difficult to change policy on country parks, which are designated by law for the purposes of nature conservation, countryside recreation and outdoor education.

"The development minister just pointed out the worst scenario in the hope of forcing the public to think hard about realistic, or less desirable, options for increasing land supply."

Yesterday, the Development Bureau also clarified that only about 40 per cent of the land area is covered by country parks.

Friends of the Earth general-affairs director Edwin Lau Che-feng said building flats in country parks was not a realistic option. "The government should not attempt to encroach on country parks," he said.

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

18

This article is now closed to comments

Another Social Critics...
***That 'CY' & Its Related Group...
1) With Barry Cheung in first 6-9 Months of its Terms, Manipulation of Up-Pushing
Already SkyRocketing HK's Land & Property - Pricing, Out-Exceed 97's Level almost 50%.
Until be Temporarily & Compulsorily Stopped by Financial Secretary & Monetary Authority,
thru Temporary Implemenation of 'Ginger Tactics', though didn't got its much Intended Effects.
***Still Looking for More Excuses in Release of 'Ginger Tactics', if there Existed...!!!
2) Now again with Paul Chan in 'Hunting' for More Land Supplies...Disguisedly said for
coming Ten Years Need.
***Seemingly more Alike to Squeeze-Out/Sell-Off the most Treasured out of HK's.
***BLACKHANDED & BLACKHEARTED***
1) Manipulation for Self/Other Profiteering, thru SkyRocketing HK's Land & Property - Pricing.
2) Abuses of Power in its Governmental Positions, in Self/Other Profiteering in Actuality.
***CENTRAL CHINA GOVERNMENT...DON'T BE FURTHER DECEITED...!!!
1) BoXiLai, China Railway Minister & its Group's Incident in MainLand.
2) AuManLun's Incident in Macau...Etc!!!
***WATCH CAREFULLY, SEE CLEARLY & DISCLOSE PUBLICLY...!!!
As Long as that 'CY' & Its Related Group are Still...'EVIL NATURE'
Intentionally, Insistedly to Plan & Execute their Profiteering Acts...
In Against to HK's Best Interest, in Short Term, not to say Long Term Perspective !!!
***CENTRAL CHINA GOVERNMENT...DO HK's GOOD-SAKE...!!!
***IMMEDIATE DISMISSAL of that 'CY & Its Related Group!!!
caractacus
The nonsense Paul Chan spouts is a smoke screen for the Government total inaction over the New Territories so-called Small House Policy. This gifts free Government land and a 3 storey house for average building cost $1.2m to any male calling himself an indigenous villager and vouched for by a statutory declaration (which is never independently verified) from the Village Representative.
The Small House Policy is the principal driving force behind environmental destruction and corruption in the New Territories.
Question: WHAT PROTECTION is the Government giving to Country Parks?
Answer: NONE
caractacus
Meanwhile the Country Parks are in imminent danger from developers buying agricultural plots from indigenous villagers and the indigenous diaspora living in other parts of the world or other areas of HK making multiple applications for houses. The indigenous villagers pretend the houses are for their own use, when almost all are intended to provide a fat rental income or a windfall from sale, all organised by the Heung Yee **** and colluded in by Government, especially District Lands Offices and the Town Planning Board in the guise of "protecting" against development under a DPA. They routinely favour applicants no matter how fraudulent the application and just as routinely ignore and brush aside valid objections. In Sai Kung Country Park for example, plans are afoot to allow building of huge numbers of houses which will at least triple the size of the villages, all for greed.
Where is the protection the Chief Executive talks about?
the sun also rises
actually, only 40% of our land area are occupied by our over-preious country parks which are our pride--------everyone can visit the country parks within half an hour from his/her home----what a nice thing ! This Chan Mau-por has never done his 'homework' seriously before he wrote on public policies in his blog -----an official blog indeed ! How careless and absent-minded this old guy is !
scmpcuty
Naughty CY Leung! Having the most detested guy in his cabinet go out and "test waters" while knowing its full of sharks ...he has deliberately pushed his dirty guy to do some more dirty dancing!
daily
I had a real good laugh after reading the comments below and couldn't agree more...........this guy is the biggest A-hole in HK right now, and probably for a long time to come..........he has got to have the lowest EQ possible and also the least qualified person ever in the history of HK government to make any public statements such as "testing the waters".............You know what this tells us?............the fact that CY Leung is still hanging on to him and haven't kicked him out yet, goes to show that CY Leung is in the same "standards" as Paul Chan...........HK has been going downhill since this idiotic CE took over, along with his team of losers such as Paul Chan...........
When will the Central government step in and just make these two idiots disappear...........
tanrex
The biggest idiot is the Central Government having selected this cy & idiots to govern Hong Kong.
ninacheung
Enough is enough! Paul Chan has shown over and over and over again that he does not have a smallest clue of what he's doing, what he should be doing, what the HK people want, and to top it off he's apparently also stupid enough not to get some experts to check the facts for him and/or give him advice on how to act in his public position. Do we have to physically remove this idiot from his office or what does it take for the guy to finally get the gist of it and QUIT!
chuchu59
Sack the idiot! As if the Government's popularity isnt low enough. After a series of blunders, even the dumbest person would get wiser and check all facts before sounding out a proposal. This guy is a true liability. CY, when are you going to let this guy go? Right now, he is probably the most-hated person in Hong Kong. I thought most accountants were pretty smart. We have an exception here I am afraid.
hardhang
Where did CY find these people ?

Pages

 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or