• Sat
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • Updated: 11:51am
NewsHong Kong
EDUCATION

Hong Kong Unison threatens court action on racially segregated schools

Advocates say schools mostly made up of ethnic minorities violate anti-discrimination laws

PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 18 September, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Wednesday, 18 September, 2013, 11:35am

The existence of racially segregated schools in Hong Kong violates anti-discrimination laws, say advocates of ethnic-minority rights who are considering taking the government to court. They also point to the failure of schools to offer Chinese as a second language - an option opposed by the Education Bureau.

The education policy sets the stage for locals to live "parallel lives" from a young age, which may in turn cause misunderstanding, isolation and racial prejudice, equal rights advocates say. It is discriminatory and leaves the government liable for prosecution, they say. "We do not take this decision lightly as legal action could put parties into adversarial positions and compromise possibilities," said Puja Kapai, a board member of Hong Kong Unison, an NGO for ethnic-minority rights.

"But we will not lose another generation to the system."

Stephen Fisher, director general of Oxfam Hong Kong, said it was considered segregation when ethnic minorities made up more than 90 per cent of the roll in some schools. Segregated schools and the lack of a second-language curriculum for Chinese has plagued the non-Chinese-speaking working class for years. Their plight intensified after the handover, when Chinese became a necessary requirement for tertiary education and most kinds of work. That stripped ethnic minorities of the chance to attend university and get a good job, Kapai said. Added to that was the low awareness Chinese locals had of non-Chinese Hongkongers, despite living in their midst for generations. "We are leading parallel lives, but never had the chance to integrate and interact," Kapai said. Taken together, the problems created an underclass.

Kapai, a professor of law at the University of Hong Kong, said the government could be taken to court through a judicial review, as well as for violation of the Race Discrimination Ordinance. They could make a decision in January, depending on input from the Poverty Commission and the UN Children's Rights Convention, and government action in the next few months, Kapai said.

"The law is very clear - it's action, commission or omission," Fisher said. "If you allow something to happen without doing something about it, it is an act of omission. If you left a [public] school to become solely of ethnic minority students, it's an act of omission and therefore direct discrimination which is against the law."

He said the city had 31 "designated public schools", out of 852 government schools, that enrolled mostly ethnic minorities.

Children unable to learn the Diploma of Secondary Education's Chinese curriculum are taught GCSE-level Chinese, which is equivalent to Primary 4 Chinese and falls below university admission requirements.

A bureau spokeswoman said the label "designated schools" was removed this year. Fisher said a change in name did nothing. "If a school is 90 per cent ethnic minority, I don't care what the label is, it is a segregated school," he said.

Share

More on this story

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

5

This article is now closed to comments

kim.chen.16568
ridiculous!!!!
the most important thing is those ethnic minority to work harder in learning Chinese!!!! What the government should do more is on this aspect.
It is unrealistic to set another standard!! So what if the EM can enrol in some schools???? Eventually they cannot write and read Chinese as normal HKers do and they cannot do most of the work in HK!!
Another question. if the EM can study university with lower Chinese requirement, how about the local student? Many local students were rejected by uni becoz they failed their Chinese language.
If the EM really want to integrate into HK society, they should follow what our society is doing but not demand out society to lower our universal standard just for them!!
thenext
My questions is: Is UNISION intended to make Hong Kong racially (making everyone Chinese), culturally (following Chinese culture by everybody) and linguistically (everybody only or either speaking Chinese) homogenous? If the mission of UNISION is to make Hong Kong racially homogenous, perhaps this action would be much needed.
I disagree with the term "segregation" to refer to the schools that cater for ethnic minority students. This term is being used in Hong Kong to indicate the physical separation of people. Then those "girl" schools should be considered sexually segregated schools? Why don't those women rights activists sue the government for allowing the girls to get educated separately (in segregated manner)? In fact this term was used in SA to refer to the situation where Whites and Blacks were not only physically separated, their access to resources was also intentionally made inequitable. Some American schools are called segregated because they receive inequitable funding from the states based on their revenues. However, this is not seen in Hong Kong. The only thing ethnic minorities are educated separately, because of their distinct cultural and linguistic background. UNISON, please stop all this.
aplucky1
another pos lawyer with a big mouth
so this big mouth wants to create schools within schools, maybe she should pay for it
Camel
A mistake brought over from the colonial ruling time. Those minorities shouldn't have been put into segregated schools but normal Chinese schools, following the same curriculum - education, language and standards like Chinese. A mistake leading to a present problem of non-integrated minorities (of many generations) in HK, unable to speak and write in Chinese, fit into Chinese culture and society in order to work and live among Chinese.
They have no chance to get, higher education, a decent job in HK and many will have to accept low paid jobs or slide into crime committing.
caractacus
HK Govt. especially Education Bureau is institutionally racist. The schools and teachers usually are not.
ESF should have taken these spiteful bigots to court instead of giving in and accepting a cr ap py deal.
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or