• Sat
  • Jul 12, 2014
  • Updated: 11:10am
NewsHong Kong

Calls for government to explain denial of free-TV licence to HKTV mount

PUBLISHED : Monday, 21 October, 2013, 5:20pm
UPDATED : Tuesday, 22 October, 2013, 8:45am

More current and former executive councillors are urging the government to explain its rejection of Hong Kong Television Network's bid for a free-to-air television licence, as consensus builds across the political spectrum that a third licence should be granted.

The mounting pressure comes as HKTV staff continue their sit-in outside government headquarters after a march brought tens of thousands of protesters to Tamar on Sunday.

Calls for an explanation came from Exco member Starry Lee Wai-king and former Exco member Henry Tang Ying-yen, while executive councillor Regina Ip Lau Suk-yee suggested HKTV could appeal.

The government, meanwhile, issued its sixth statement - including officials' public speeches - since its controversial announcement last week granting licences to i-Cable's Fantastic TV and PCCW's Hong Kong Television Entertainment but not to Ricky Wong Wai-kay's HKTV.

It reiterated its stock position that the decision included "no political consideration" and was made after the assessment of "all relevant factors".

Pan-democrats have shown support for a joint petition planned by pro-government lawmaker James Tien Pei-chun to press for a licence for HKTV.

But at the same time they are seeking to invoke the Legislative Council's special powers to demand official documents behind the government's deliberations.

Tien called the letter, to be submitted to the chief executive and Exco, the "swiftest way" to resolve the saga.

"I have not heard from any parties that oppose the issue of all three licences so far," Tien said.

"If [Legco] were to investigate, it would take months ... If a licence is granted to HKTV now, staff can go back to work."

Pan-democrats including members of the Civic Party and Democratic Party said they supported Tien's proposal "in principle", depending on the final wording of the letter.

The 27-member camp is seeking to invoke the Legco (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance through the information technology and broadcasting panel to force the disclosure of all documents submitted by the administration to Exco, including consultancy reports.

Lee, of the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong, said the government should consider disclosing further details despite HKTV's pending judicial review.

She said the party would decide on the powers and privileges invocation after hearing officials' explanation at next month's IT panel meeting.

Suggesting an appeal by HKTV, Ip, of the pro-government New People's Party, said: "The Exco receives a lot of appeal pleas. We would carefully consider a request from the failed applicant."

Fellow party member Michael Tien Puk-sun said he "cannot see why" he should vote down the pan-democrats' motion for an inquiry "if the government remains silent and refuses to disclose more information".

Tang, who spent 14 years on Exco, said the government owed the public an explanation.

The confidentiality rule did not mean the government had to keep the rationale behind the issuing of licences confidential, he said.

Legco president Jasper Tsang Yok-sing said the government had to evaluate whether it should reverse the rejection.

"The government has its own reasons … but it has to consider whether they are sufficiently important that it cannot change its original decision," he said.

Civil servants were surprised by the decision, as all the paperwork for three licences had been submitted to Exco.

"The bureau did the work and all the efforts were wasted," Federation of Civil Service Unions chief executive Leung Chau-ting said.

Watch: HKTV supporters gather at Hong Kong government to protest against failed licence bid for second night



For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

Here is one main reason that CY Leung could not come out straight to tell the public.........Ricky Wong was being too cocky and annoying during his bid for the license and in some ways made offensive comments towards the government during the last 3 years...........while this is not an acceptable reason.........in Chinese culture, that is enough to ****s-off th government enough to reject him..............
If Starry Lee is a member of Executive Council, why does she need an explanation? Didn't the Executive Council approve the decision as per the last paragraph of this article?
It is interesting that after all the vital considerations such as, housing issues, democracy and electoral reform, Manila hostage crises resolution and assorted Mainlander issues the government seems to have stumbled over a far more routine matter which now looks a lot like "the straw that broke the camel's back"
If the Exco was divided on the issues of 2/3 licences or whether to grant HKTV a licence the CE should only make the final decision based on the public interest. If CY is able to convince the public at large that this is so people might be satisfied. However, even the SOJ, the Exco convenor, the Legco President and Starry?(exco member) seem bewildered by CY's decision. Its a real pity as because I thought CY was getting better over the past couple of months. He is up to his own hardline tactics again I am afraid.
CY & Co have really outdone themselves this time. In the past year or so, they mostly managed to repeatedly alienate 'only' the opposition and large swathes of the Hong Kong people.

This time, they even managed to see their own kind come out running out of the burning house. I mean, if even James Tien publicly voices out his opposition, then you must have gone pretty far.

Are the first rats leaving the sinking ship perhaps? Is this the chance those pro-Beijing politicians who never warmed to CY anyway, been waiting for? Stick it to him, and put Carrie on the throne?
I was wondering about that too.

But then again, the government has been telling us conflicting things about this. First, they said it was a special ExCo subcommittee of John Nitwit Tsang, Carrie Lam and Rimsky Yuen (note the absence of Gregory So...) that considered the applications carefully, and then decided to reject HKTV's, partly basing themselves on a (thusfar secret) external consultant's report.

Then yesterday, the government backtracked, and said it was the Chief Nitwit himself who took the final decision 'after considering the advice of each Executive Council member' (imagine the time wasted if that is true... now we know what the guy does all day). See: ****tinyurl.com/n37xqw9

That Starry Lee appears to feel in the dark about this, suggests that the second story might not be true, bringing us back to the first Three Musketeers version. I don't know which version is worse anyway, it is all so bad.
"...Starry Lee appears to feel in the dark about this..." Actually I didn't read that she was in the dark but that she is calling for the public to be in the know or at least that is how I interpret this: 'Lee, of the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong, said the government should consider disclosing further details despite HKTV's pending judicial review.
She said the party would decide on the powers and privileges invocation after hearing officials' explanation at next month's IT panel meeting."
If it is true, silence is gold particularly for a small place and small clique culture. A primitive behavior that suffocates. Hong Kong will never catches up with the rest of modern cities.


SCMP.com Account