• Thu
  • Nov 20, 2014
  • Updated: 5:05am
NewsHong Kong
HARBOURFRONT

Activists walk out of rezoning meeting on Central PLA dock

Boycott of public discussions on planned facility in Central comes after Civic Party lawmaker is allowed only 10 minutes to speak

PUBLISHED : Monday, 04 November, 2013, 7:47pm
UPDATED : Tuesday, 05 November, 2013, 2:31pm
 

The first round of discussions on plans for a military dock on the Central waterfront ended in a walkout on Monday by activists complaining of "procedural violence" and "rape of public opinion".

The boycott of the Town Planning Board meeting came after Civic Party lawmaker Dr Kenneth Chan Ka-lok’s address ended abruptly when his microphone was turned off to enforce a 10-minute time limit for speakers.

The limit was set as the board faced the longest series of discussions in its history on whether the government should hand over rights for a 0.3 hectare strip of public land to the People’s Liberation Army for military use.

A dozen public meetings have been scheduled over the next two months for the hearings.

But Chan said: "These restrictions are utterly irresponsible and unreasonable.… They are an insult to the public’s intelligence and a rape of public opinion."

Describing the cutting off of his speech as “procedural violence” he said he might take legal action.

Winston Chu ka-sun, former chairman of the Society for Protection of the Harbour, said the board had no legal grounds for setting an arbitrary time-limit.

"Entitlement to a fair hearing is a constitutional right and as a quasi-judicial body [the board] must act reasonably and provide a fair hearing," Chu said.

Why should taxpayer money be used to build such a beautiful harbourfront only to have a military base in the middle of it?
Kenneth Chan Ka-lok

Chu, a lawyer, former TPB member and long-time harbour-protection activist, said he had a stack of paperwork two metres high prepared for the hearings and it would be impossible to make his case in 10 minutes.

But board chairman Thomas Chow Tat-ming, who is also permanent secretary for development, said the board had received a record 19,000 written submissions since the public consultation began in February, and it had to use the “special arrangements” out of fairness to all.

Chow said he had informed all 2,000 scheduled speakers of the time limit a week ago.

Activists have been fighting the rezoning plan since it was quietly announced in February.

"Why should taxpayer money be used to build such a beautiful harbourfront only to have a military base in the middle of it?" Chan asked during the hearing.

"It’s not a question of ideology or whether or not we trust the PLA – anyway, we’ve all seen what happened on June 4, 1989 – this is an issue about our rights as citizens."

A 1994 Sino-British exchange of notes, registered with the United Nations a year later, promised that the 14 British military sites in Hong Kong would be handed over to the Chinese military after the 1997 handover.

The document vaguely stipulated that a 150-metre stretch of reclaimed harbour was to be left for construction of a naval dock. But it was not stated how far inland it would extend or whether it would be listed as a military site.

The PLA and the government have repeatedly stated that dock would be accessible to the public when not in military use.

But Chu said that under the Garrison Law, once the military had ownership of the land, there could be no legal public use and Hong Kong’s legal system could not protect anyone who knowingly or unknowingly trespassed.

 

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
11

This article is now closed to comments

caractacus
Thomas Chow is rapidly gaining a reputation for being a poodle of the establishment and of special interest lobbies such as the HYK.
Why?
johnrai7
Hahahaha... probably our Govt ppl are brainwashed.. :D or may wanna create HK- Asia's militirized city ... btw who is attacking us? Martians??? :)
dascaldasf
A military/naval dock in the heart of Central serves no purpose whatsoever. This is not an issue of patriotism but commonsense. If the argument persists on this issue, then one should ask why the new government offices in the old Tamar site was constructed and not left in its original site so it could be improved upon. No where does a military base/dock is situated or located in the heart of a business district. It just simply cannot be allowed. Public consultation leaves me questioning whether our ministers and heads of this government have any brains at all! The SAR government points out that this dock would be enjoyed by civilians when the dock/yard is not in use is ludicrous, especially if one is to say it is to be enjoyed 'at the generosity of the PLA'. This is all a bad joke! Have not heard that military docks are open areas. Do what the PLA does best ... hide from public view!
fsk999
I wonder how many of the 2000 are pro government/PLA forcing the TPB to curtail presentations in this way? The main players should agree a list of points/questions in order to progressively complete them during their individual 10 minute slots.
LunarRepublic
They're just gearing up for the takeover in 2047.
cc88
The only reason for the PLA to have this is a projection of power. There can be nothing more exciting for them than having photographs of their first aircraft carrier against the skyline of Central sent around the world. An international financial centre, back under Chinese rule, with all their military might. It's purely for international PR. It is, of course, their prerogative, but it's pure vanity.
darehk
anyone who has ever attempted to challenge the Town Planning Board knows it is impossible. They act in mysterious ways and there is no logic that ever prevails
newyorkgirl
Thank you Mr. Winston Chu for the defense of Victoria Harbor for the last 18 years. "Not a hero nor a coward, but just an idiot who wants to serve Hong Kong", not an idiot, sir, but a patriot.
shuike
If a military establishment in the middle of Central serve no purpose, how come they didn't challenge the British before 1997?
johnyuan
Winston,
.
Don’t call it quit. Do still what you can for the harbor. In fact, pick up your pen and tell us what the PLA berth site is all about. I like to read it in SCMP.
.
I always think that the military use of the site has been so since the colonial time. It is a convenient strategic location for the protection of Central District where the Governor House, major bank headquarters not to mention few foreign councilors are still located. Hong Kong police force will have a limited use when commotion becomes a security problem.
.
John Yuan

Pages

Login

SCMP.com Account

or