• Sun
  • Dec 28, 2014
  • Updated: 6:59pm
NewsHong Kong

Communications Authority accused of double standards on competition

PUBLISHED : Saturday, 16 November, 2013, 4:49am
UPDATED : Saturday, 16 November, 2013, 6:07am

Economists and lawmakers slammed the government for reassigning the third-generation mobile phone spectrum to encourage market competition, while limiting the number of free-TV licences to avoid excessive competition.

The Communications Authority said yesterday the government would take a third of the spectrum from each of the four current operators and put it up for auction.

The authority's chairman, Ambrose Ho Pui-him, in explaining the decision, said the government was keen to encourage market competition.

"We are of the view that this option is more likely to encourage competition and allow new investment to enter the local market. It is more likely to promote innovative services from new 3G spectrum assignees and the incumbents," Ho said.

Susie Ho Shuk-yee, permanent secretary for commerce and economic development, said different policies applied to TV licensing and the 3G spectrum auction and they were entirely different exercises.

The Commerce and Economic Development Bureau released a statement saying essentially the same thing - that different procedures applied to the two exercises and that no submissions to the Executive Council were required concerning the reassignment of 3G spectrum.

But both economist Dr Andy Kwan Cheuk-chiu and Civic Party lawmaker Claudia Mo Man-ching criticised the government for what they said were contradictory policies on competition in the 3G mobile and free-television markets.

The government last month decide to grant only two new free-television licences instead of three on the grounds that having too many operators would be bad for the market.

"It is clearly a double standard," Mo said. She said the government should open the free-television spectrum for auction under the same logic.

Kwan said: "Competition in the 3G mobile market is already very fierce, yet the government intends to introduce new competitors into the fight. But the government has expressed immense fears about adding just another couple of television licensees."

He said the government should never judge market outcome or intervene except when it deals with a new industry.

But Dr Terence Chong Tai-leung, a professor of economics at Chinese University, said the government's two decisions showed consistency to an extent.

"Both the spectrum reshuffling and the television licence cap would give certain protection to existing players in the respective markets," said Chong.

The lawmaker for the information technology sector, Charles Mok, slammed the delay in issuing a consultancy report, which left no room for negotiation by existing 3G operators.

"It has been almost three months since the report was completed on August 29, but the authority didn't publicise it until after the announcement," Mok said. He said the operators had been left with no way to object to the conclusions except by lodging a judicial review.

The Consumer Council said the authority should collaborate with the network operators to minimise the impact on consumers.


For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

I now pay $80/month and the speed and coverage is exactly the same as my $309/month plan. no difference in how i surf the web on my mobile on the streets, except the marketing on the brochure had said the $309/month plan was WAY SUPERIOR. by the way, both are unlimited plans. I work in the IT industry and so I know there is NO DIFFERENCE in 2G, 3G or 4G. There is no such thing as 4G LTE -- it's just 3G. the problem is in the size of the pipes, not the speed. Finally, ALWAYS good thing for the HK consumers when there's more competition. forces the snake oil salesman to innovate for real (not just talk, but take real action).
LTE has a lot less latency than 3G. Also 3G and LTE are both significantly faster than 2G. Maybe you don't experience a difference when surfing websites, but there's absolutely a noticeable difference when you do something a little more bandwidth intensive such as using remote desktop with your mobile device or streaming videos.

I also have a background in IT and I find your claim that 2G, 3G, and LTE as "the same" very dubious. 2G in particular is very slow. GPRS1 for example can only support a download transmission speed of around 300 to 500 kilobits per second tops.
So which standard is it? A different standard that depends on which end of the radio spectrum? You must be kidding me. Sorry different department, different processes -- same mixed message. Innovate HK -- innovate! That's the real game. Oops sorry... different department (ITC). One Government, Two+ Systems.


SCMP.com Account