• Thu
  • Dec 25, 2014
  • Updated: 10:35am
NewsHong Kong
ANIMAL WELFARE

Woman faces fines after saving stray dog

PUBLISHED : Sunday, 24 November, 2013, 6:12am
UPDATED : Sunday, 24 November, 2013, 6:12am
 

An animal lover who saved an injured stray dog when it was caught in a government snare faces a hefty fine for her act of kindness.

Sue Cuthbertson has been charged with breaching the Rabies Ordinance by not having a licence and failing to have the dog vaccinated. She has also been charged with failing to leash the dog in a public place, and faces up to HK$4,000 in fines.

Cuthbertson, a volunteer for the group Sai Kung Stray Friends, said she only claimed to be the owner of the mongrel, which she named Red Dog for his coppery fur, because she feared he would be put to sleep after he was seen being picked up by Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department officers.

The dog was caught in traps twice in May. On the first occasion, Red Dog ran off with the trap still attached and chewed part of his own paw off, only to return and be caught again in one of the department's snares.

Cuthbertson says the dog is healthy apart from the partly missing paw. He is living at the Friends' kennels in Sai Kung.

Cuthbertson has been summoned to appear in court on December 4. It is the second time she has been charged after claiming ownership of a stray. The first time, two years ago, she pleaded guilty by letter and escaped a fine.

"I plan to plead guilty again. I can't see any point in not pleading guilty because I said it was my dog. Basically I had no other option. If you want to save these dogs you have to say you own them," she said.

"I believe 100 per cent Red Dog would have been euthanised. I know the department try their hardest to re-home stray dogs. He is a gentle giant but at the time he was terrified and they could not get near him and would have deemed him not suitable for re-homing."

The case highlights the need for quick implementation of a trap, neuter and return scheme that would reduce the number of strays, she says.

The department said the case had been referred to prosecutors after Cuthbertson claimed the dog from the kennel.

A spokeswoman said the department's traps, which did not cause injury, were endorsed by the Animal Welfare Advisory Group. She added that two potential sites had been identified for a trial trap-neuter-return scheme, in Yuen Long and Cheung Chau. One of the two was tentatively scheduled to begin operating early next year.

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
5

This article is now closed to comments

campbell52
Do the Hong Kong courts have nothing better to do than fine a woman HKD4,000 for rescuing an injured stray dog, court date set for Dec. 4, because the animal wasn't licensed and vaccinated?
Come on Hong Kong, encourage people to rescue animals, don't punish them, give Sue Cuthbertson and this dog a break. Let intelligence prevail.
C. Campbell
rpasea
OK, a fine may be in order but how about $100 as a token sum? One question I have is why govt is using snares that harm the animal? Surely there is a more humane way to capture stray animals.
.
Regarding dogs off leash, one only needs to look at Sai Kung on a weekend to see many dogs off leash pooping at will.....a fine for pooping would be welcome to discourage this poor behavior of dog owners.
amunro
Well done Ms. Cuthbertson - You are right to say you saved the dog's life. Who believes AFCD? They only home the very very easy ones. And why are they saying their traps don't harm, animals when the evidence is right here?
mercedes2233
While I support Cuthbertson, I wonder why she didn't know better, having been charged before, to have Red Dog immediately licensed and vaccinated and have a leash with her in case she befriends another stray animal again?
joyalsofi
Rescuing animals that would otherwise be killed, is commendable. I would suggest that vaccinating rescued animals needs to be part of the procedure as well as obtaining a license. Or is that overly burdensome without funding from outside sources, such as government? Does vaccination need to be added to the ' trap, neuter and return scheme' that needs to be implemented? Should this be advocated to be included in the upcoming policy and budget address?

Login

SCMP.com Account

or