• Tue
  • Dec 23, 2014
  • Updated: 8:29am
NewsHong Kong

Hong Kong police stop-and-search tactics questioned after 1.6m spot checks last year

Hong Kong officers carry out four times as many stop-and-searches as forces in London, New York

PUBLISHED : Sunday, 24 November, 2013, 6:12am
UPDATED : Sunday, 24 November, 2013, 7:57am


  • Yes: 62%
  • No: 38%
24 Nov 2013
  • Yes
  • No
Total number of votes recorded: 395

Hong Kong police carry out four times as many identity checks and on-the-spot searches as their counterparts in New York and London, official figures show, even though the effectiveness of the procedure appears to be in sharp decline.

Police in the city carried out 1,637,334 stop-and-search checks on pedestrians last year, according to figures released by the force. A further 345,917 people were stopped and questioned.

Experts on criminal law say the frequent searches could lead those searched to doubt the credibility of the police, while activists said members of ethnic minorities, especially South Asians, were more likely to be stopped and searched.

David Weisburd, director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Crime Policy at George Mason University in Washington, who co-authored a study published earlier this year that analysed millions of individual checks, said such actions were likely to have contributed to a reduction in crime over the last decade, but that they had unintended negative consequences.

"Whatever the number, [stops and frisks] are a type of strategy that is likely to lead to long-term negative consequences in evaluations of police legitimacy," he said after studying the Hong Kong data. "And police legitimacy is a key issue for the police."

The searches were four times as common as in New York - which has twice the crime rate of Hong Kong - and London, where the crime rate is 10 times as high.

The population in these two cities is also about a million larger than in Hong Kong, which is generally considered to be one of Asia's safest cities.

The checks can include verification of the person's identity, a check on the contents of their pockets and a body pat-down.

Advocates of stop-and-search tactics point to Hong Kong's status as a free port and the inherent problem with illegal immigration that entails. They also insist it serves as a deterrent.

One recently retired senior police officer with more than 25 years' experience said: "You have to remember that Hong Kong is a very easy place to get into for many people, from many different places. Illegal immigration has been and will continue to be a problem."

The ex-officer, who declined to be named, said in some districts from time to time, a target culture develops around the number of stops and searches carried out. "It's amazing what a distorted view of a potential promotion can do," he said.

The police figures also indicate searches in Hong Kong are less likely to detect a crime than in New York and London.

In Hong Kong, only one in 113 searches resulted in the detection of a crime. By contrast, one in nine checks in New York led to the issuance of a summons, while one in 12 checks in London resulted in an arrest in 2011.

"My initial impression is that these numbers are very large," Weisburd said. "I thought 700,000 in New York with 37,000 police was a very large number … incredibly large. It seems that Hong Kong is doing more."

The Hong Kong figures also suggest that the city's stop-and-search strategy is becoming a less effective tool in the battle against crime.

Labour Party lawmaker and minority rights campaigner Cyd Ho Sau-lan said Hong Kong should be proud of its low crime rate, but must not become complacent about street crime.

"We must tackle the problems of the ethnic minorities through education. They lack educational opportunities, they lack job opportunities. Sooner or later, we will pay for this,'' said Ho, who is a member of the Legislative Council's security panel.

Under section 54 of the Police Ordinance, police have the power to stop, detain and search anyone who "acts in a suspicious manner" or who an officer "reasonably suspects of having committed or of being about to commit or of intending to commit any offence".

A police spokesman said there was "no legal definition of 'reasonable suspicion'".

The force rejected comparisons with the two other cities, where studies have pointed to racial profiling as the key factor in deciding who was searched.

Unlike London and New York, Hong Kong police do not record the ethnic background of people who are stopped and searched.

"Police conduct stop and question and stop and search in accordance with existing laws," Hong Kong police said in a statement. "We do not target any specific ethnic groups."

But Annie Li Man, of NGO Unison, said ethnic minorities from South Asia were much more likely to be searched.

In England and Wales, a 2010 study by the Equality and Human Rights Commission found that the police force used "stop and frisk" policies "in a way that is disproportionate and possibly discriminatory."

In Paris, where police also do not collect data, a study last year showed that the odds of being checked were 5.18 times higher for black people than whites, and 9.93 times higher for Arabs.

In New York, 91 per cent of all checks involved ethnic minorities last year, according to the New York Civil Liberties Union.


Identity Card Facts

The law

  • All Hong Kong residents aged 11 or over are required to register for an identity card. A failure by any person aged 15 or above to produce proof of identity without reasonable excuse constitutes an offence.
  • A police officer can stop and detain any person for a reasonable period to check his or her identity and inquire whether the person is suspected of having committed an offence.
  • A police officer can search a person of the same sex if he or she "has anything that may present a danger to the police officer" or "for anything that is likely to be of value to the investigation of any offence that the person has committed, or is reasonably suspected of having committed or of being about to commit or of intending to commit".

The history

  • Handwritten paper identity cards were introduced in 1949
  • IDs were laminated in 1960 and fingerprints and photos added.
  • Legislation introduced in 1980 required everyone above the age of 15 to carry a proof of identity
  • In June 2003, Smart Identity Card System begins rolling out


For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

Yes honkiepankie is right, how many motorists breaking the law are "stopped and checked"?
We have traffic anarchy on our downtown streets and yet only pedestrians are considered fair game.
Back in the 1970s and 80s motorists did not dare to park or even stop their vehicles in no stopping zones. Tens of thousands of tickets were issued by patrolling officers monthly. Now this is down to just a trickle. The result: total disrespect by drivers for our traffic regulations.
I cannot even board a franchised bus at many legal bus stops without venturing out into the roadway due to drivers of other vehicles blocking the designated bus stops.
"..even though the effectiveness of the procedure appears to be in sharp decline.."
Could the decline of the effectiveness be down to the fact the action is successful and there are less criminals wandering our streets?
"..such actions were likely to have contributed to a reduction in crime over the last decade, but that they had unintended negative consequences.."
So the police action has been successful and because it has, it has produced a negative consequence! With whom? Not the average law-abiding citizen that is for sure. And because of these supposed 'negative consequences' are police supposed to stop their actions?
But they are meaningless figures. Why?
How many police per head of population?
How many officers on foot patrol compared with those on vehicles?
How many on patrol after dark?
How many stopped had criminal records (I guarantee an almost possible figure to obtain in NY and London)?
On these poorly presented figures the HK Police would appear to much more efficient and diligent than their counterparts in NY and London. So they deserve a pat on the back! Where is that in the article?
Another fine example of the unaccountability of the Hong Kong police. While the police waste their time doing random I.D. checks (99.12% ineffective!), blatant lawbreaking goes on in plain view throughout the city (illegal parking, gratuitous horn honking, dripping air conditioners, etc).

But going after these kind of public nuisance offenses is not as sexy or likely to lead to a promotion as busting a drug dealer or illegal immigrant, so we end up with this insane waste of resources spent on harassing minority groups.
Most of the stops I've witnessed over the years (13+) were of young people in HK - typically teenage and young adult males... a break-down on the numbers would have been helpful ...
HK police do an excellent job.
What I got from this article is that the focus of the stop and searches were on South East Asians. Lets Imagine that the focus of stop and searches were white and male, would everyone be happy with that. And further that the result of 1.9m spot checks failed to detect crime. If I were running a business and a repeated action by employees were costing a lot for example admin, processing, time away from the actual job, in this case detecting crime, with a negative result. Would you not review it. 1.9m stop and searches set against a relatively small force, is a lot of police officers.
I would like the thank our HK police force for the great job they are doing. We owe them the security we have in this city, safe for families and society as a whole.
The statement, "Hong Kong police do not record the ethnic background of people who are stopped and searched" is not strictly true. When a police officer stops and questions or stops and searches an individual, the officer will record the particulars of the stop and the details of the person in his/her police notebook. The persons details will include his/her national identity or ethnicity and gender; e.g. "Chinese male.", "Philippines female", "Pakistan male," etc. These terms are also always used in police reports and witness statements. I'm not suggesting that this practice is wrong, merely that the statement in the SCMP article is not strictly true.
I am a frequent visitor to Hong Kong. My gender/ethnicity will be undisclosed. If a police officer asks me to show proof of identity, my immediate response will be: "Of course officer" and comply with his/her request. In my country of origin, (major western) my first thought would be: If I reach
into my pocket for documents this trigger happy cop may taser me or worse,drop me in my tracks with a couple of slugs.
The Hong Kong Police, whilst mired by accusations of being politically biased by protesters in recent years, have generally conducted themselves with much professionalism and effectiveness. I'd like to join my fellow Hong Kong-ers here and pay tribute to the wonderful work in protecting our livelihoods and for making our city so fair and secure.
Let’s put this as simple as possible, the most important figures of this report: “Hong Kong police stop-and-search tactics questioned after 1.6m spot checks last year” are that New York has twice the crime rate of Hong Kong and London’s crime rate is 10 times as high as of HK.
Does anyone who is questioning or ridiculing the stop-and-search tactic could imagination how their own and their families life could be affected if we had to life under such a high chance of being a victim of a crime?
This clearly shows that the HK police stop-and-search tactics are working.
Our crimes statistics makes us the envy of most if not all countries around the world.
If this is the price we need to pay to life in safety, we having a very fair deal.
I’m a resident for almost 20 years and when people ask me what I like most about HK it is defiantly not the good air, but the safety for my family and myself we all enjoying here no matter what ethical back ground we have.



SCMP.com Account