• Fri
  • Apr 18, 2014
  • Updated: 9:01pm
NewsHong Kong
DEVELOPMENT

Villagers vow to fight on despite key Legco defeat over country park plan

Lawmakers vote down motion to keep enclave out of park; kuk chief says rule of law 'shaken'

PUBLISHED : Thursday, 05 December, 2013, 4:45am
UPDATED : Thursday, 05 December, 2013, 4:45am

Nature conservationists last night scored what appeared to be a better than expected victory, as lawmakers voted to include a Sai Kung enclave in a surrounding country park. But rural chiefs and their supporters vowed to carry on their fight inside and outside the courts.

A majority of Legco members voted against an amendment to the bill tabled by Heung Yee Kuk chairman Lau Wong-fat which would have excluded Tai Long Sai Wan village from a Sai Kung country park.

Lau's amendment was voted down 22 to nine by geographical constituency lawmakers. But it might be even more embarrassing for Lau that the motion was rejected by the functional constituency sector 14 to 13.

The defeat means that the plan to incorporate the 17- hectare enclave into the Sai Kung East Country Park, approved by the chief executive in May, is now passed.

Some lawmakers expressed sympathy for villagers frustrated by officials' perceived inaction in safeguarding their livelihoods.

Some legislators also expressed concern that that there could be even fiercer battles ahead over including enclaves in country parks. Villagers, who gathered en masse outside the legislature building during the debate, vowed to challenge the decision in court.

Environment Secretary Wong Kam-sing rejected the argument that the plan robbed villagers of property rights.

"We will not rob [the villagers] of their properties. All existing uses and ownerships will be respected and protected. Applications for new houses will continue to be allowed," Wong said.

He assured lawmakers that villagers will benefit from improvements to local infrastructure as a result of the plan.

Ahead of the vote, Lau told fellow legislators that officials were "violently robbing" villagers of property and land rights. "The land value has already dropped to a very low level. Landowners have been reduced to mere symbolic owners of their properties," Lau said. The plan would "shake" the rule of law and breached the Basic Law, he added.

Cyd Ho Sau-lan, head of the subcommittee dealing with the issue, called on the government to improve local facilities and services, and foster "green tourism".

Elizabeth Quat, of the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong, which backed Lau's motion, claimed the government was "driving villagers to desperation".

 

Share

7

This article is now closed to comments

pauluszimmerman
Next step: The other 74 enclaves. Immediate concern are the development plans for Hoi Ha, So. Lo. Pun, Pak Lap, To Kwa Peng, Pak Tam Au and Tin Fu Tsai.
John Adams
This is the first really good HK news in years ! Wonderful !
Thanks to all those who voted against Lau's resolution.
.
Maybe at last we can turn the tide against the indigenous villagers' housing policy which has been so blatantly abused as to have made a joke of the "rule of law" in the NT ( Mr Lau please note : the Rule of Law works both ways - not just for indigenous villagers when it suits them!) .
.
Next step is to ban all vehicular traffic on Lugard Road .
And then really to get to work on our filthy air.....
chuchu59
T'is great news. For once, we should roar the government on.
pjp
A good start! Hopefully one day the SHP will be history.
caractacus
Yes, the villagers are desperate - to abuse the he ll out of the small house policy and cash in on massive development which will cover the Country Parks with houses and pollution, so they can fill their greedy, selfish boots with fat wads of cash regardless of the environmental damage.
The deviousness and hypocrisy of these spoiled people is nauseating.
Cyd Ho totally misunderstands the real situation and as usual has two faces. Elizabeth Quat is either stupid, dishonest or both.
The small house policy is a font of corruption, period.
dascaldasf
Maybe now the TPB should put on spectacles and examine all applications carefully and sensibly.
johnyuan
‘Ahead of the vote, Lau told fellow legislators that officials were "violently robbing" villagers of property and land rights. "The land value has already dropped to a very low level. Landowners have been reduced to mere symbolic owners of their properties," Lau said.’
.
Here we have it. The land is not for private use but for buying and selling. It has a commercial value like any other land in Hong Kong. The court must take this fact into account. Why should the villegers gave special previlage? It's time to revoke it.

Login

SCMP.com Account

or