• Sun
  • Sep 21, 2014
  • Updated: 11:27am
NewsHong Kong

Schools of law hit out at Law Society's plan to run its own qualifying exam

Solicitors' body debates setting up its own qualifying exam, but three major law schools say its reasoning is 'unclear and unconvincing'

PUBLISHED : Thursday, 12 December, 2013, 5:54am
UPDATED : Thursday, 12 December, 2013, 5:54am

The city's three major law schools have united to oppose the Law Society's "unclear and unconvincing" plan to set up its own qualifying examination for aspiring solicitors.

In a rare move, the law faculties of the University of Hong Kong and Chinese University issued a joint statement with City University's school of law this week. In it, they argued that the plan floated by the legal body would not produce better lawyers, "nor is it in the best interest of Hong Kong".

The statement was submitted to the Legislative Council's panel on administration of justice and legal services, which is scheduled to discuss the matter on Monday.

At the centre of the row is the universities' defence of a three-decades-old system called the postgraduate certificate in laws (PCLL). The system trains better-performing graduates of Bachelor of Laws or postgraduate Juris Doctor degrees for a year before they become solicitors or barrister, regulated respectively by the Law Society and Bar Association. The schools base the curriculum on benchmarks set by the professional bodies.

"The system has worked well," the schools said. "We do not support the … proposal, the justification of which is unclear and unconvincing."

The society said a "common entrance examination" might provide more opportunities for students to become lawyers, so it was undertaking a month-long consultation on the idea.

It said there was no intention to abolish or replace the PCLL, though society president Ambrose Lam San-keung had questioned the certification because the universities that provided the training also ran the assessments students had to pass.

The society said it would comment on the latest development after Monday's Legco meeting.

HKU said that from the next academic year, it would set aside places for students who failed to enrol in the PCLL at the first opportunity, with places allocated based on criteria such as time spent working at a law firm.

"When we raised the possibility of enlarging the number of entrants to the PCLL, the Law Society replied that it did not have the manpower or resources to monitor the additional number of students," the statement said.


For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

What the myopic enclave is too cowardly to recognize is that
common law can’t expect society to adjust itself to suit the law
but it must adapt appreciate and serve society in a local manner
legal mystification undermines the Chinese community’s long term interest
Scott Turow holds that Two-L isn’t needed after One-L
US law schools are shortening the years for JD from three to two
Why the trend reversal in HK law training?
Not many years ago law qualification required no academic training
2A3O + either some articling or dinner serving experience of one or two years
produced many of HK’s legal emeriti
In the short term common law may be HK’s strength
If left ossified it may prove the weakest link
in the city’s long term development
What the Law Society is too cowardly to say is that this is happening because of City U. The other law schools, which are light years ahead, are going to be collateral damage.


SCMP.com Account