• Thu
  • Aug 28, 2014
  • Updated: 2:32pm
NewsHong Kong
AIR POLLUTION

Tell us what we don't know: Hongkongers sceptical of new AQHI

Air Quality Health Index gets sceptical reception from Hongkongers as it records 'very high' levels of pollution on launch day

PUBLISHED : Monday, 30 December, 2013, 1:49pm
UPDATED : Tuesday, 31 December, 2013, 3:31am
 

The government's new Air Quality Health Index (AQHI) launched yesterday to scepticism from the public - and immediately drew attention to terrible air quality for most of the city.

A free smartphone app which issues alerts on real-time air pollution levels and health risks was also launched by the Environmental Protection Department.

Some members of the public felt a new system or software application would not make much of an impact on air quality.

"The air quality in town is always bad," said Jack But, 28, who works in Causeway Bay. "I don't think the new index or app would be very helpful to me or in improving the air."

Student Joey Lam said she would consider downloading the app but questioned whether alerts would change anything.

"So people get alerts every morning, and then what? They'll probably just look at it and then forget about it," said Lam. "And what about elderly people who do not have smartphones?"

"Even if the air is visibly bad, the government always finds a way to say it's fine," schoolteacher Joe Butler said. "I live in Tung Chung so I can taste and see the bad air. I don't need an app to tell me how bad it is there."

The AQHI got up and running without a glitch yesterday morning - and it was bad news as usual in terms of overall air quality.

Pollution levels at all three roadside monitoring stations hit 10 by 6pm yesterday, meaning the risk to health was "very high".

The department officially replaced its 18-year-old Air Pollution Index (API) in hopes the new AQHI would "better communicate air pollution information to the public to alert them to take precautions as necessary".

The new index now analyses three-hour average concentrations of four major pollutants, namely ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulphur dioxide and tiny particles (PM2.5 and PM10) using a scale from 1 to 10, and 10+.

The scale is divided into five health-risk categories - low, moderate, high, very high and serious. Daily forecasts are also issued.

At Causeway Bay yesterday, pollution reached a "very high" level of 10 at 6pm. Levels of PM10 - suspended particles that are harmful to health - hit 134 micrograms per cubic metre, more than double the highest level that the World Health Organisation considers safe.

Central and Mong Kok also hit 10 and a health alert was issued urging children, elderly people and those with heart or respiratory illnesses to "reduce to the minimum" physical exertion and activities outdoors, especially in areas of heavy traffic.

Most of the city's 12 general stations, including a new one at Tuen Mun, hovered at "moderate" health risk levels of 5 to 7 in the afternoon before deteriorating in the smoggy evening. Central/Western, Sham Shui Po, Kwai Chung, Yuen Long and Tuen Mun reached 9 by 6pm.

Professor Alexis Lau Kai-hon of the University of Science and Technology said the AQHI was an improvement, but needed to offer more detail on short-term health effects of air pollution.

 

 

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

15

This article is now closed to comments

tennis9090
It's not a new air quality index we want...It's new air that we need.
superdx
This morning I checked the API because I wanted to go for a run around Sha Tin / Tai Po. The API reading was 86, which is ridiculously high, and I decided not to go.
Now that this app is out, it says only "6" which is "Moderate". And just looking outside my window, the air is like a yellow/brown soup, and looks horrid. Last night, the API was about 60 so I went for a run, it wasn't great but I could see out my window.
I guess I should distrust the new AQHI readings. Which is really sad because the old API seemed to be more accurate. Are there any independent air monitoring sites for HK? There was some talk awhile back about crowd sourced API sensors. Maybe that's going to be a more reliable measurement.
gimli
superdx:
Try Clean Air Network: ****www.hongkongcan.org/eng/
They have an iphone app which is crowdsourced and are independent of the government.
Dao-Phooy
Agree this is a distraction. Not a word on how the policies to improve our air quality. Another smoggy new year ahead with no respite in sight!
cheechee129
It is a well recognised fact that air in Hong Kong is polluted. So the government does not have to prove it again and should not try to distract the public's attention. The launch of the new index indeed can give an accurate data to the public. But I believe that what the public looking for is a practical measure to tackle the air pollution.
Bluetillew
You mean the precaution of 'not breathing as much or as heavily'. So we'll be doing more of that then. Thanks a bunch!
Kubrick
Well spotted. The new index is just a distraction, used to keep people's minds off the real issue that Hong Kong's air is poisoning us and the government is doing little to address that issue.
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or