• Wed
  • Oct 29, 2014
  • Updated: 9:39am
NewsHong Kong

Hong Kong to consider destroying 33-tonne ivory stockpile after Beijing crushes illegal tusks

PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 08 January, 2014, 9:32am
UPDATED : Thursday, 09 January, 2014, 7:32am


  • Yes: 90%
  • No: 10%
9 Jan 2014
  • Yes
  • No
Total number of votes recorded: 605

Pressure is building on Hong Kong to destroy its 33-tonne ivory stockpile after confiscated ivory was crushed on the mainland for the first time on Monday.

Hong Kong has previously rejected destruction as an option.

A spokeswoman for the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department said it was "aware of steps in other places to destroy forfeited ivory" and was "reviewing the effectiveness of existing disposal measures".

She said a revised proposal to destroy Hong Kong's confiscated ivory would be discussed by the Endangered Species Advisory Committee (ESAC) on January 23.

In Dongguan , Guangdong, diplomats, media and international guests watched as two giant grinders destroyed 6.1 tonnes of ivory sculptures and raw tusks.

The move signalled the willingness of the mainland - the world's largest ivory market - to play a greater role in wildlife protection. It followed a global conservation conference in March at which China and the United States co-sponsored measures to increase protection for more than 40 species, most of which are threatened by Chinese consumers' tastes and eating habits.

Local activists welcomed Beijing's actions and called on Hong Kong to follow suit.

"The time has come to destroy Hong Kong's stockpile. This will send a strong message to poachers and smugglers that Hong Kong is not a viable trade route, and is a city keen to demonstrate leadership on conservation," said Gavin Edwards, director of conservation at WWF-Hong Kong.

Hong Kong plays a role in the ivory trade both as a transit point for the mainland and as a consumer in its own right. Last month 14 people were arrested at Chek Lap Kok airport after customs officers seized 160kg of raw tusks and ivory products in their checked baggage.

As pressure builds on Hong Kong, conservationists worry that ESAC - a statutory advisory body made up of university researchers and businesspeople - will reject the proposal.

"The committee has discussed this issue already, but members of the committee have objected in the past," said Alex Hofford, a campaigner for Hong Kong for Elephants. "However, I think there is still a good chance that the government will follow China on this as Hong Kong tends to follow China's lead on policy matters."

The Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department had conducted a trial in Tsing Yi in 2012 to destroy seized ivory and found incineration - rather than crushing the ivory - to be an effective method of disposal. It later dropped the idea because most of its advisers opposed it.

In June, the Philippines destroyed its five-tonne stockpile of confiscated ivory; and since 1992, three elephant range states in Africa - Zambia, Kenya and Gabon - have incinerated their own stockpiles.

James Compton, senior director at the wildlife trade monitoring network Traffic, said that while destroying stockpiles sent a strong message, governments could choose to hold seized ivory in secure storage.

He said governments choosing to do so should be careful to keep inventories to "provide assurances that ivory does not find its way back into illegal markets, further feeding illegal trade".


For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

I'm not convinced that crushing the stockpiles of ivory from already dead elephants is the solution to preventing further poaching of ivory from live elephants . In fact this could be counter productive and lead to further massacres of elephants for their tusks. Would it not be a far better idea to sell off this ivory to legitimate ivory artists ( or even those people who believe in its 'medicinal' properties,) at a large fee per tusk and ALL profits then go towards the Protection of the elephants.? How many salaries could then be covered for additional park rangers and conservationists and protection of elephant and rhino environments. Crushing the stock pile does not make sense to me, what a waste of the animals' lives who died in the amassing of this ivory.
This is not a decision to be taken lightly. Typically people think that destroying the ivory will stop the poaching. Not in the least. All it does is drive up the price and make it more profitable for the smugglers.
Perhaps it would have been better to chip it and sell it in small, controlled batches, with the money going to the frontline of the war on poaching.
Sadly it's one of those "damned if you do, damned if you don't" issues.
The HK government is incapable of even making such a simple decision........let's face it, the government officials just don't have the balls to do anything other than show up in the office 9-5.
I do not believe China destroyed all their stockpile and would like to know what they did with the Ivory dust which can still be used. They should have burnt it. Its was just a PR stunt. If Hong Kong does destroy, let hope they use a proper crusher and and a wood crusher like China and also burn it then I might have a bit more faith.
I love elephants and I love ivory.
Couldn't we ban sex altogether simply because of HIV ?
Thank you Chinese people and children for taking a stand against the Ivory trade and the unrelenting slaughter of these wonderful animals. Please rather come to Africa to see them in the wild. Also remember our rhinos are almost extinct from poaching.
Thank you from South Africa
Yingnam Fong
It is obvious that the indecision of the government to cause an action to dispose of the huge stockpile of ivory stuff by fire destruction, has inevitably incurred large amount of storage and administrative costs to the taxpayers. It is also obvious that the situation has been made because of the otherwise too many options available to better utilize the ivory material such as as raw material for local sculpture class and value added give-away, both of which are considered not in violation of the strict requirement imposed on the banned trading of the elephant tusks. But we must note that even such arrangement can well be replaced by the buffalo tusks. The continuous custody of the ivory tusks would not only transmit a wrong signal that the law might be changed to allow flexibility but also the risk for the tusks currently held in custody being stolen and sold in the black market for money. That said, I don't see any good reason for the indecision to continue since the trend to burn the confiscated ivory tusks has been established in many countries. Perhaps the local officials have to provide justification for the delay in falling into line of what the others have done in this regard!
Please sign these Hong Kong school girls' petition to get the government to destroy this city's 33 tonne stockpile: www.avaaz.org/en/petition/Hong_Kong_Government_Please_Burn_the_Confiscated_Ivory_Stockpile/
More info on the campaign here: www.Facebook.com/HK4elephants
And here: Twitter.com/HK4elephants
HKG officials, if you burn the ivory, you are driving up black market ivory prices. You should flood the market with cheap ivory and the poachers will be out of a job,simple economics.




SCMP.com Account