• Fri
  • Dec 19, 2014
  • Updated: 4:38pm
NewsHong Kong

Hong Kong should employ commuter workers from Pearl River Delta, says Paul Cheung

Singapore's success in using Malaysian workers could be replicated with mainland residents, says Lion City's former population chief

PUBLISHED : Monday, 24 February, 2014, 4:45am
UPDATED : Monday, 24 February, 2014, 9:04am


  • Yes: 34%
  • No: 66%
24 Feb 2014
  • Yes
  • No
Total number of votes recorded: 403

Hong Kong should open its doors to workers from the Pearl River Delta who could commute here and solve the twin problems of a shrinking workforce and growing housing shortage over the next 30 years, says the architect of Singapore's population policy.

The suggestion by Paul Cheung, director of population planning in Singapore from 1986 to 1996, borrows from the city state's experience in supplementing its labour force with around 150,000 workers who commute daily from neighbouring Malaysia.

The proposal is feasible as the transport network between cities in the delta region will be much improved in 30 years' time.

"Importing labour is a very outdated concept, especially for Hong Kong. It should look at it as talent flow across the Pearl River Delta region," Cheung told the South China Morning Post.

"The core problem for Hong Kong is urban pressure. If the city adopts the flow concept, the loading on Hong Kong will be less," he said.

Cheung's recommendation came as the government's public consultation on formulating a population policy, which started in September, ended yesterday.

The government had suggested importing more overseas workers to replenish the labour force, which is expected to shrink from 2018.

Cheung engineered a baby boom in the 1980s by creating extra childcare places that allowed couples to have more children. As a result the fertility rate in Singapore increased from 1.43 in 1986 to 1.96 in 1988 - close to the replacement level of two.

Cheung, who worked in New York from 2004 to 2012 as director of the United Nations Statistics Division, said some workers in Manhattan commuted from the neighbouring state of Connecticut. US Census Bureau statistics show the daytime population of Manhattan is about 3 million, almost double the nighttime number of more than 1.5 million.

"There's no travel restriction between New York and Connecticut. People in Connecticut now can freely move to New York and work there and move back in the evening. The same can be true for Zhuhai and Shenzhen down the road," he said.

Noting the negative sentiment of some Hongkongers towards mainlanders, Cheung said the government could consider the Fair Consideration Framework in Singapore. This ensures that jobs paying more than HK$20,000 a month are advertised for locals and there is tightened scrutiny of companies that have a disproportionately low concentration of Singaporeans.

"The reality is that there are many qualified and talented Chinese for Hong Kong to pick and choose. The trick is how to develop a system to attract and retain them, without alienating the local population," Cheung said.

But he warned Hong Kong to take heed of a recent proposal by the Singaporean government.

"Don't open the gate too fast and too wide - be mindful of how locals react to foreign talent."

Singapore's recent plan to increase foreigners to nearly half of its population by 2030 prompted rare protests from citizens. The influx of foreign workers, making up more than a third of employees in Singapore and primarily low-skilled, also led to social conflict. A riot involving 400 foreign workers broke out in the city's Little India district in December.

Cheung said Hong Kong should also consider developing "third-age" education for the retired and significantly increasing the number of subsidised childcare centres.

"I don't get a good sense of what Hong Kong will be like 30 years down the road. There is no vision for the urban environment of Hong Kong, the liveability … as a home," he said after reading the consultation report. "It focuses only on … 'human capital' but ignores … other key issues, like pensions and elderly housing."


For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

Hong Kong already accepts 55000 immigrants a year from China under the one way permit scheme which is regulated by the Chinese side, not Hong Kong. If Hong Kong wants to maintain its position as an international finacial center and a desirable place to do commerce then it is imperative that we attract talented immigrants from all parts of the world. Focusing on the PRD, or China in general would severely limit diversity of thought as most people educated in China were taught that there is only one right way to do things which is contrary to Hong Kong's way of ecouraging people to think critically and creatively. In addition to the lack of diverity in talent Mr. Cheung's short sighted opinion doesn't take into account the time and cost of commuting. Despite the fact that links will be improved it still takes time and it won't be cheap.
How are they meant to commute ? The trains are full. Will they pay HK tax ?
it's already a fait accompli. Walk around Central at lunchtime and at least half of the business suit-clad crowd speak Mandarin. Go to the lobby of IFC, Exchange Square, York House, Alexandra House, etc. and see how many business people speak Cantonese. Hong Kong needs to realize it's been re-colonized, this time by the Chinese. Self-rule, "two systems", Legco, the Chief Executive, freedom of press...these are all thin fig leaves to disguise the reality from Hong Kongers. We're flnally waking up to reality, but it's far too late. Have a look at the Prince of Wales building and the several hectares of waterfront land reserved for the PLA, and you'll realize what's really going on.
With the salaries our tycoons are paying they cant even pay thevdaily commute . Besides that our "efficient" immigration department would not be able to handle that extra flow
The boundary fences have to eventually come down . Might as well do it now and get it all over!
Dai Muff
They are not staying now because they cannot. Not because they do not want to. I have seen a LOT of mainland job recruits just out of university who want to stay and want us to get them a work permit. But we cannot, as long as a Hong Konger can do the job. Many I have seen are desperate not to go back.
This is a terrible idea
I always feel that Hong Kong is not really having a problem of shortage of workers/talents. Yes, we have a declining working population and we have a hard time in finding people to do the low-end job, I think it's ample time for business-owners to re-think their business model. I recall seeing a TV program which show how a dish-washing business thrive with the use of machineries. It's quite strange to see that we are in shortage of workers when we are having a huge pool of university graduates getting into business world every year and we have so many people getting social allowance without going to work. Also yes, we have a shortage of construction people, but this is all the government fault on pushing all the mega-infrastructure projects together at one time, causing shortage in both people and resources. I still vividly remember in the days of doom in 1999-2003 there are so many construction project halted and so many construction workers unemployed. The current government seems push too hard to pursue projects which avail merging Hong Kong with China, which virtually kills Hong Kong's edge as a distinct city. As a side issue, how would a Chinese like to go to a Japanese ramen restaurants to eat the Chinese-favored japanese ramen with wonton....when they can have wonton noodles at home everyday? Similarly, without offence to the Chinese, if Hong Kong is so Chinese-customized, with imported Chinese workers serving Chinese customers with Chinese-made products?
I suggest Mr. Cheung takes his Singapore passport - no special lane please - gets into the train in KT and goes for a quick coffee in the Lo Wu Shang - please do walk through the underground train station - and then come back and think your idea over once more!
Would you say your parents colonized Hong Kong when they migrated here? You are making a mockery out of your ancestors by spreading this type of hate literature.



SCMP.com Account