• Mon
  • Dec 22, 2014
  • Updated: 7:57pm
NewsHong Kong
POLITICS

Pro-Beijing legal expert backs Bar Association's rejection of high barrier to nomination

Pro-Beijing barrister joins Bar in view that 50 per cent threshold may breach Basic Law

PUBLISHED : Friday, 02 May, 2014, 3:39am
UPDATED : Friday, 09 May, 2014, 4:42pm
 

A pro-Beijing legal expert has backed the Bar Association's view that requiring 2017 chief executive candidates to win 50 per cent support from the nominating committee could be unconstitutional.

"The 50 per cent [threshold] is not intended in the principles of the Basic Law," Alan Hoo SC, Basic Law Institute chairman, said yesterday.

At an RTHK forum, Hoo said he largely agreed with the views of the Bar, including its rejection of the high barrier to nomination advocated by many of his fellow Beijing loyalists.

The barristers' 44-page submission to the public consultation on electoral reform, made on Monday, said requiring a "simple majority" of nominating committee members to put forward candidates might not "pass muster". Bar chairman Paul Shieh Wing-tai clarified that such a requirement "could run the risk of being unconstitutional".

The submission also rejected granting all voters nomination rights in some form.

While Hoo, a delegate to the Chinese People's Political Consultative Congress, said the Bar's opinions set the legal framework for reform, fellow speaker and former Bar chairwoman Audrey Eu Yuet-mee said the association "is not the law".

"Respect the rule of law but don't take the Bar Association's electoral reform submission as the law," said Eu, of the Civic Party. "There are other international academics who find public nomination viable."

Eu believes it would be constitutional to put "reasonable restrictions" on the committee.

The Bar says the idea would impede the nominating committee's power, as set out in the Basic Law, to put forward candidates.

Separately, Alliance for True Democracy convenor Joseph Cheng Yu-shek insisted on the viability of public nomination. "If a constitutional document cannot fully respect people's political rights, there might be a need for amendment," Cheng said.

The alliance, made up of 26 of the 27 pan-democratic lawmakers, has proposed a three-track nomination system that would allow the public, parties and the nominating committee to put forward candidates for the election.

An earlier version of this article stated that Alan Hoo was the Basic Law Committee chairman. He is in fact the Basic Law Institute chairman. We apologise for the error.

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
2

This article is now closed to comments

321manu
In being the first Beijing loyalist to acknowledge the flaws within the pro-Beijing position as discussed in the Bar Association opinion, Mr. Hoo is to be commended. He stands in stark contrast to complete lackeys and Beijing parrots like Carrie Lam, who only noted where the Bar Association pointed out pan-dem demands to be out-of-bounds, without acknowledging their criticism of the pro-Beijing position. Of course, being more reasonable and less disingenuous than Carrie Lam is not much of a compliment, but Hoo deserves applause here. Hopefully, his peers will develop the fortitude and moral fiber to follow his lead.
I agree with ianson. The compromise position will lie in the composition of the nominating committee, and how that can be made more democratic and "broadly representative". Anson Chan 2020 and the group of academics have offered good ideas to that end. And Paul Yip and Sarah Choy have a good article on this site worth reading in that regard as well. Now the ball is in the Beijing lackeys' court...we'll see how badly they whiff on it.
ianson
Hopefully Hoo has not been put forward to say this as the kiss of death for the democratic middle ground. It's hard to believe it can be otherwise in view of all the stringent pronouncements from Party leaders in past months. Hoo and the Bar are right, of course, so now the debate must focus entirely on making the NC democratic.

Login

SCMP.com Account

or