• Sat
  • Dec 27, 2014
  • Updated: 11:28pm
MTRC
NewsHong Kong
TRANSPORT

Top-level apologies over high-speed rail debacle fail to pacify lawmakers

PUBLISHED : Monday, 05 May, 2014, 6:39pm
UPDATED : Tuesday, 06 May, 2014, 3:05am

An apology from the transport minister failed to quell mounting criticism in the legislature over a two-year delay in the high-speed rail link to Guangzhou.

Lawmakers from both the pan-democratic and Beijing-loyalist camps ramped up calls for the minister, Professor Anthony Cheung Bing-leung, to take responsibility for the HK$67 billion project, which is tainted by accusations of lying and a cover-up.

The increasing pressure on Cheung included calls from two pan-democrats for him to resign, and pledges by a pro-establishment party as well as the pan-democratic party where he was once vice-chairman to back a Legislative Council investigation. An executive councillor also said Cheung had clearly made "a grave error in judgment".

That was despite Cheung's public apology yesterday for his poor handling of the construction delay and not telling legislators about it.

"I should have told lawmakers … back" on November 22, Cheung said at a meeting of the Legco railways subcommittee. "I apologise to Legco and members of the public. I am willing to bear the criticism."

Asked repeatedly by lawmakers to quit, he said: "I feel remorseful for the incident. After years in politics, I understand that politicians have to face various challenges and choices. I have been reflecting."

Cheung said he had wanted to tell lawmakers at a November 22 meeting that the rail link might not be ready by the target of 2015.

But he changed his mind after MTR Corp chief executive Jay Walder called him the day before to assure him that the existing schedule was still feasible.

On Saturday, Cheung said he had given the MTR Corp "the benefit of the doubt".

Civic Party lawmaker Claudia Mo Man-ching said Cheung's "integrity was in doubt". "My impression is the government has shed its responsibility and blamed it all on the MTR Corp for bad management," Mo said.

"Some lawmakers have proposed a vote of no confidence against you, which I tend to support, so my question is, minister, would you consider stepping down?"

League of Social Democrats chairman "Long Hair" Leung Kwok-hung echoed the question.

Others wondered aloud if a new investigation was in order.

Helena Wong Pik-wan, a member of the Democratic Party (of which Cheung was vice-chairman in the early 1990s), said lawmakers should exercise their authority under Legco's powers and privileges ordinance to establish an investigative committee.

Did the government and MTR use "one lie to cover up another?" she asked.

Executive councillor Regina Ip Lau Suk-yee said Cheung had clearly committed a "grave error in judgment", but invoking Legco's special powers might be a waste of public funds.

"I don't see what purpose a P&P can serve at this stage … other than to get more heads rolling," she said.


Timetable for the Guangzhou trains that are running late

2010 Construction starts on the fully underground, 26-kilometre Hong Kong section of the high-speed railway to Guangzhou.

March 2013 MTR projects programme team realises work on northern part of West Kowloon terminus and tunnel linking Mai Po and Shenzhen's Huanggang Park is significantly behind schedule. MTR decides rail project is still on track for completion in 2015.

April Contractors estimate terminus will be finished only in June 2016. MTR urges them to look for solutions to catch up with schedule.

June MTR realises 2015 target can be met only if it opens terminus in stages, putting only six of 15 tracks into use initially.

July MTR executive committee agrees with partial opening.

September Highways Department is briefed on partial opening. It does not indicate agreement, but asks MTR for more information. Plan was never announced to the public.

October MTR asks contractors for proposal to complete project in 2015 based on partial-opening plan.

November Government intends to tell Legislative Council of possible delay, but is stopped by MTR chief executive Jay Walder, who calls Transport Minister Professor Anthony Cheung Bing-leung and says deadline is still feasible. At Legco railways sub-committee meeting, Cheung's undersecretary Yau Shing-mu says major works can be finished in 2015, but tests and trials will take another six to nine months. After the meeting, MTR presents schedule towards completion to government, which says it is too brief.

February 2014 Terminus contractors tell MTR that even with partial-opening plan, terminus will not be ready until June 2016.

March Black rainstorm causes serious flooding in Yuen Long tunnel and damages tunnel-boring machine.

April MTR and Cheung announce rail link will not open until 2017. Cheung says he is taken by surprise. Projects director Chew Tai-chong decides to retire early. MTR announces internal investigation.

May Cheung sets up expert panel to investigate project and government's role. Panel chairman Professor Lee Chack-fan resigns because of conflict of interest.

Ada Lee and Olga Wong

 

Share

Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
5

This article is now closed to comments

daily
Both Walder and Chien should go................they've been withholding the truth from the public the hold time...............About time these two useless executives leave the MTR and let other competent people (if any available) to take over.
chris.wong.37604303
Nowadays, Ministers, Commissoners, and the CE are not a good post! Some may say they enjoy good salary and deserve to have loads of works, face accusations from the public, and face the interrogations from Legco members. Some bombardments and disrespectful treatments from the Legco members, like Long Hair, are not easy to tolerate. Cheung Ping Leung, who was a member of Democratic Party, has been devoted to make contributions to HK. He is one of the elites of HK and does not bother how the present payment is! It is alike the CE and even, the CE loser, Tong Ying Nin, who both care about the salary? Of course,it is "no". They have their goal to work for HK, no-matter what goal they have planned! When there is a failure, those persons who want to project themselves for highpofiling always urge the concerned official to stepdown as for his accountability. Being the top person of the bureau, Cheung is accountable that is nothing but the true! But taken into consideration that every mistake/fault leads to compel the involved to quit, that is rather absurd, and if the involved has resigned, can anyone succeed in taking up the post? Perhaps,Long Hair or Chan Wai Yip do! But I doubt it very much! To criticize some one is easy but to render a good proposal is difficult. Currently, the Legco members are always in a mess, unlike in the old days. Some of them have brought in the Taiwan cultures that are used to scuffling/throwing furniture/fighting.HK is likely to be ruined by these guys
Dai Muff
Call me naive, but wasn't the whole stated aim of having these government ministers that they should be accountable? How can a government minister get away with saying "I just didn't know"? "Accountable" means "bullet proof" now.
rvto
Here means accountable telling sorry or giving apologies, and go on with same.
rpasea
"Accountability" for principal officials means accountability to Beijing, not the people of HK. CH Tung put this in place to subordinate the civil service to Beijing control - easier politically to fire an appointed minister than a directorate grade job-for-life civil servant.

Login

SCMP.com Account

or