• Thu
  • Oct 2, 2014
  • Updated: 6:52pm

Basic Law

The Basic Law was drafted as part of the Sino-British Joint Declaration covering Hong Kong after its handover to China on July 1, 1997. The joint declaration stated that Hong Kong would be governed under the principle of ‘one country-two systems’ and would continue to enjoy its capitalist system and individual freedoms for 50 years after the handover.

NewsHong Kong

Mini-referendum organisers add new vote question to increase public's interest

Voters will be asked whether lawmakers should block an unacceptable reform proposal as organisers move to address credibility worries

PUBLISHED : Tuesday, 27 May, 2014, 6:33pm
UPDATED : Wednesday, 28 May, 2014, 2:25pm

Occupy Central organisers last night added an extra question to their unofficial "referendum" next month in an effort to boost turnout and stave off accusations by moderate pan-democrats that the poll would lack credibility.

Co-organiser Dr Chan Kin-man could not confirm the wording of the question last night, but said it would "let citizens express their demand on genuine universal suffrage".

The question will focus on whether voters believe lawmakers should reject any plan for the 2017 chief executive election that does not meet international standards for democracy and that does not guarantee a choice of candidates. The wording will be confirmed tomorrow after organisers discuss it with University of Hong Kong pollsters, who are providing technical support for the June 20-22 poll.

"There are positive or negative ways to put it," Chan explained. "If the 'negative' [word] - 'veto' is used, it would be a challenge to those officials who say that Hongkongers should accept an [imperfect] reform package."

The main purpose of the vote was to allow all registered voters to choose between different models for the 2017 poll. But organisers came under fire after activists shortlisted three models under which the public could nominate candidates. Moderate pan-democrats say that disenfranchised voters wanted to avoid confrontation with Beijing, which says public nomination is against the Basic Law.

Chan said the extra question would give Hongkongers a "bigger incentive" to vote.

The move followed a call from a group of pan-democratic lawmakers, who on Sunday urged all Hongkongers to take part in the poll, even if they did not agree with the shortlisted models. They say a high turnout will send a message to Beijing: that Hong Kong wants a "truly democratic" election when the public picks the city's leader for the first time.

One member of the group, lawmaker Leung Yiu-chung, found overwhelming support for public nomination when he held a "mini-referendum" in his New Territories West constituency.

The Neighbourhood and Workers Service Centre gathered views from 2,677 people in Kwai Chung and Tin Shui Wai between Thursday and Sunday on public nomination, and 95 per cent supported the idea.

Leung acknowledged yesterday that his research was not as scientific as a survey, but said "voters" would have to make a conscious effort to express their views by approaching the volunteers who were collecting votes.

He also rejected suggestions the poll should have included questions on the role of the nominating committee, the body specified in the Basic Law to choose candidates.

"If it's complicated, the people may not [understand] it and the poll could be meaningless," he said.

The question of how to choose candidates in 2017 is threatening to derail hopes for reform. Pan-democrats fear the nominating committee, which is likely to be stacked with Beijing loyalists, will filter out critical candidates before the public has its say. But Beijing is adamant that the mini-constitution does not allow public nomination.

The government is expected to launch a second round of consultation later this year. Its reform plan will need a two-thirds majority in the Legislative Council - meaning some pan-democrats must back it - and the approval of the central government.



Related topics

More on this story

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

Occupy has really lost its marbles. The initial motivation was to ensure that CE candidates were not to be arbitrarily pre-selected by BJ, such that HKers would be given real choice. So the solution was to give HKers a referendum to determine the public's preference on how the election should be conducted, if not by a method chosen by a majority, then at least by a method with plurality support. But then they shortlisted to only extreme suggestions, and risk losing all centrist support. So now, to recover from their initial bonehead move, they propose another bonehead move. If people don't approve of any of the 3 suggestions, they can at least vote yes/no to a generic question instead. But if few people opt for any of the 3 options, and most agree that the election should be conducted in a way that meets international standards, where does that leave Occupy? They would not be able to legitimately suggest an actual alternative, and they might be left with compelling support for adhering to international standards....after they themselves screened out models that experts agreed met said standards. In effect, in trying to wrangle turnout, they are orchestrating a scenario that will merely confirm their own stupidity. Beijing has just pulled off some fierce Jedi mind-trick. They're getting Occupy to shoot themselves in the foot in a manner that was previously the exclusive domain of BJ.
Blimey. . . !!! What is the meaning of "mini-referendum"? Oxymoron rhetoric? "Referendum" should involve widely the public, but now we have it in a small particular interest group, and it is still called "referendum". (Oh! I see, they are politicians!) Is it something like HK-style democracy: Let's have democracy, but you must follow me and no compromise because the rivals are always devils. Yes this is still democracy and I am glad that this HK-style still not turning into Thai-style.


SCMP.com Account