• Sat
  • Jul 26, 2014
  • Updated: 6:05am
NewsHong Kong

'Runway plan may displace dolphins but they'll be back', say airport officials

'Dolphins are complex, they can move around,' says consultant as conservationist queries logic

PUBLISHED : Friday, 20 June, 2014, 12:20pm
UPDATED : Tuesday, 24 June, 2014, 9:47am

The loss of marine habitat to a new airport runway will probably displace the population of Chinese white dolphins from north Lantau - but they will come back eventually, airport officials and their consultants say.

The main draw would be a new 2,400-hectare marine park connecting the existing Sha Chau and Lung Kwu Chau Marine Park with a planned Brothers Islands marine park.

The plans were confirmed in the Airport Authority's environmental impact assessment for a third runway, released yesterday.

However, the report drew scorn from one dolphin conservationist, who described it as contradictory.

One of the airport's consultants, Dr Thomas Jefferson, told a media briefing yesterday that some decrease in dolphins was to be expected during construction. "But the plan and hope is that the large marine park will provide an attractive habitat for the dolphins to move back to," he said.

Jefferson noted that dolphin numbers declined when the airport at Chek Lap Kok was built in the 1990s but quickly rebounded after the Sha Chau marine park was designated. No projection was made in the report as to where the dolphins would go while the runway was being built.

"Dolphins are very complex animals … they have the ability to move around," Jefferson said.

Dolphin Conservation Society chairman Dr Samuel Hung Ka-yiu dismissed the report as "contradictory".

"Imagine someone goes to your home, destroys it completely, and then tells you, 'Don't worry it will be fine in seven years', and where you go in the seven years is not their problem," he said. "Where is the logic in this?"

The report also concluded that the project would result in no adverse residual impact on air quality. But green groups said it was "flawed" and "selective".

The report, for instance, claims the project would deliver better air to Tung Chung in the form of reduced ozone pollution. It explained that simulations showed nitric oxides emitted from the airport could consume the ozone.

"They are just playing a game of numbers," Friends of the Earth officer Melonie Chau Yuet-cheung said.

The authority says nitrogen oxide emissions are forecast to increase 53 per cent to 9,500 tonnes from 2011 to 2031. But fine particles will be cut by 40 per cent as pollution reduction technology improves.

Watch: SCMP took a look at Hong Kong's pink dolphin habitat



For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

Yeah, they will be back. 'So long, and thanks for all the fish.'
HK doesn't need a third runway. What we should really be striving for, if the human race is responsible (?!), is to conserve our fellow inhabitants - ie the white dolphins.
Proposals in the EIA are just fanciful nonsense which will never materialise despite all the fanfare.
There will not be $900m in economic benefits to Hong Kong. This will only make certain rich people richer while destroying the environment.
We do not need more aircraft coming to Hong Kong burning fossil fuels. We need less but larger capacity aircraft to cater to present and future needs. Our new high speed rail link will take up to 30% of current passenger throughput away from Chep Lak Kok. The government keeps saying we need to create jobs but there is already a shortage of labour in Hong Kong. Someone is lying.
Kill the 3rd runway project now.
Have you recently been to Guangzhou's Baiyun airport? Do you know the capacity it can handle? Go take a look first then you would know the level of competition we are facing in the region.
Why is the headline not, "Loss of dolphin habitat not addressed in proposal for third airport runway"?
Where's the link to the public consultation?


SCMP.com Account