• Sat
  • Oct 25, 2014
  • Updated: 12:10pm
Beijing White Paper 2014
NewsHong Kong

Protesters speak up against lawyers' march

Two groups, one led by an ex-Law Society president, rally in support of white paper

PUBLISHED : Saturday, 28 June, 2014, 3:41am
UPDATED : Saturday, 28 June, 2014, 3:41am

A former Law Society president staged a small-scale demonstration of mostly non-lawyers in Central yesterday to counter a march by about 1,800 legal professionals voicing their discontent with Beijing's white paper.

Junius Ho Kwan-yiu, who now sits on the society's council, issued a last-minute appeal and gathered about 20 people in front of the Court of Final Appeal on Battery Path less than an hour before the other protest began.

He made patriotism the theme of his rally, aimed at "correcting" the understanding Hongkongers, including "the legal elite", had of "loving the country and loving Hong Kong".

"Since when has being a patriot become unacceptable or even a crime in Hong Kong?" Ho asked. "Some lawyers in Hong Kong have suggested that judges need not be patriotic, otherwise the judiciary's independence would be compromised or they could even acting against the rule of law. But what is the basis of such thinking?"

The bigger march took issue with the assertion in last week's white paper of Beijing's "comprehensive jurisdiction" over Hong Kong, and with its categorisation of judges as administrators who must be patriots.

But Ho noted that judges had to swear to uphold the Basic Law and their allegiance to Hong Kong and the nation.

"The white paper has not expressed anything new," he said. "It shows that the central government supports the Basic Law, the Hong Kong SAR and the 'one country, two systems' principle."

Critics who said the document threatened judicial independence were "taking things out of context", he said.

Ho called his rally "anti-dress-black", to contradict the black dress code for the other event. "It is right to wear light-coloured clothes on a day as hot as today."

The lawyer drew to his event mainly members of the New Territories Concern Group, which was set up last year to monitor government policy on small houses and unauthorised building works in the New Territories.

In a mass text message he sent out before the rally, he wrote: "Loving the country and loving Hong Kong is not only the responsibility of judges but also the civic duty of the citizens."

The note also asked people to "support implementation of the Basic Law", "protect Hong Kong" and "avoid trouble caused by reactionaries and secessionists".

Meanwhile, about another 20 people gathered outside the High Court in Admiralty calling on local judges to love China.

They also slammed the lawyers who marched against the white paper as traitors and broadcast the national anthem.



Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

who are paying these people? Are we to believe that people without being bribed actually prefer authoritarian rule than freedom? All of these people who go about hitting people or jump into the harbor appear to look similar, from a lower strata of life. Probably low level Triads who failed to move up their system and now, old and not worth much to the Triads, without benefits left are willing to do whatever they can to earn a quick buck from the CCP. Go hack a newspaper editor, get arrested for hitting a kid reading his manifesto. Does anyone believe that the CCP was NOT involved with the hacking of the newspaper editor? Maybe the HK Police.
20 vs 1800. Wasn't it a couple of handfuls vs 180,000 for June 4? I wonder if it's the same 20 making the counter-protest rounds.
Again, I see the journalistic principle of reporting both sides. But geez, where is the sense of scale? At what point do a couple of dudes with foil hats on soap boxes stop being newsworthy? I would've thought the threshold had been reached, but clearly SCMP thinks otherwise.
What this article ought to have noted is the mindless bullying tactic used by both of these pro-Beijing anti-democratic groups yesterday: a constant barrage of high-decibel slogan-shouting through loud-hailers, disrupting the orderly gathering of the legal community. They have no cogent message to convey so they think that blasting it into people's heads will suffice.
The people in the picture don't look like lawyers at all - more like 'rent a (tiny) crowd from Tuen Mun'!
Junius Ho succeeded in making a fool of himself - again.
Did any reporters ask how many lawyers were supporting him?
The blaring of the National Anthem at the High Court was an own goal by the 'patriots' as it highlighted the fact that peaceful demonstrations can take place in HK without hindrance by the authorities unlike the Mainland!


SCMP.com Account