• Mon
  • Sep 22, 2014
  • Updated: 3:12am
Beijing White Paper 2014
NewsHong Kong
POLITICS

UK report on Hong Kong 'avoids embarrassing Beijing'

PUBLISHED : Thursday, 10 July, 2014, 8:50pm
UPDATED : Friday, 11 July, 2014, 3:00pm

Pan-democratic lawmakers have slammed Britain's twice-yearly report on Hong Kong as "weak" and "avoiding embarrassing Beijing" after it did not express a view on Beijing's white paper asserting its authority over the city.

"The UK government's position is clear: Hong Kong's unique constitutional framework has worked well," British Foreign Secretary William Hague wrote in his 23-page report to the parliament on affairs in the former colony.

Hague's report came after the State Council's white paper, released on June 10, said the central government had "comprehensive jurisdiction" over the city and that some Hongkongers were "confused and lopsided" in their understanding of the "one country, two systems" principle.

Democratic Party chairwoman Emily Lau Wai-hing said the report - the 35th examining implementation of the Sino-British Joint Declaration that spelled out arrangements for Hong Kong's return to China - should have stood firm against Beijing's reinterpretation of the "one country, two systems" model.

"The UK government has its moral responsibility as a signatory to the joint declaration," Lau said. "It should be condemned."

Hague's report noted some commentators had suggested that the paper threatened the city's high degree of autonomy, but did not say if Britain agreed or disagreed with Beijing.

Instead, he said that both the central and Hong Kong governments "have been explicit that the paper did not mark a change in policy".

Kenneth Chan Ka-lok, of the Civic Party, said the report avoided explicitly commenting on the white paper as Britain did not want to embarrass Beijing. "The report lacks any judgment of the situation on the ground," he said.

"I believe the UK wants to avoid embarrassing Beijing as Premier Li Keqiang has just brought business deals of billions of pounds to Britain."

On the political reform debate, Hague urged Hongkongers to work for consensus. "It is welcome that a broad range of groups and individuals are involved. But it is clear that there is still some way to go for consensus to be reached," he said.

Separately, the central government's liaison office in Macau issued a statement that an unofficial referendum on political reform in Macau - planned for next month - would be "illegal" and without legal effect, according to a Radio Macau report.

Sulu Sou Ka-hou, of Macau Conscience, a co-organiser of the poll, said the accusation was "unreasonable".

 

Share

Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

15

This article is now closed to comments

raglan
You idiots really think the UK has HK's best interests at heart? UK does whatever benefits UK, wake the hell up, and something tells me China is MORE important than little HK. All the while we have monkeys running around with colonial flags thinking the great UK would save them, LOL......
anson
So funny, now Beijing AND London are being condemned together by the Banana Throwers Party. Why can't HK bananas just understand the British point of view. It was fun. It was a blast. But after July 1, 1997 they just don't give a rats ... And fair enough, its no longer their concern.
Camel
I am not surprised about the Pan-Dems reaction. Everything what goes against their impression is to be slammed.
sudo rm -f cy
"Hong Kong’s unique constitutional framework has worked well." Thanks for the laugh.
ianson
The UK policy on Hong Kong has been unchanged since the 1984 Thatcher sell-out: put food on the table at home and Hong Kong can fend for itself.
ngsw
Very bad journalism: The title should be something like this: "Pan-dems say the UK report . . . . . "
..
It's is just a believe or a guess by the pan-dems. The title gives the impression that it is a confirmed fact. Bad journalism.
sundayatscmp
By that you mean the US has more political reasons to make trouble for Beijing, and hence a more suitable partner for Anson and Martin, right? If you think the US is somehow more righteous than the UK or any other nations in geopolitics, think again.
raymondspchu
That is why Anson Chan and Lee Chu Ming went to the White House instead of Downing Street.
Camel
Wait a moment, I thought you all want the British Colonial Lords back?
mfchung
It doesn't matter how many times you kick a house slave, they still believe their master's house is best.

Pages

 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or