• Sat
  • Sep 20, 2014
  • Updated: 1:00pm
Public Eye
PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 20 August, 2014, 3:28am
UPDATED : Wednesday, 20 August, 2014, 3:28am

Two radio hosts fired; two very different reactions


Michael Chugani is a Hong Kong-born American citizen who has worked for many years as a journalist in Hong Kong, the USA and London. Aside from being a South China Morning Post columnist he also hosts ATV’s Newsline show, a radio show and writes for two Chinese-language publications. He has published a number of books on politics which contain English and Chinese versions.

Two radio hosts fired; two very different reactions

Remember how all hell broke loose in February when Commercial Radio sacked Li Wei-ling, who regularly used her prime-time talk show to savage the Leung Chun-ying administration? Self-proclaimed gladiators of free speech - from former chief secretary Anson Chan Fang On-sang to talk show host "Taipan" Albert Cheng King-hon - condemned the firing as a muzzling of the media without offering any proof. Pan-democratic lawmakers demanded a Legislative Council investigation. Li claimed, also without proof, that Leung had orchestrated her sacking. The Journalists Association called on Leung and Commercial Radio to prove she was not fired for political reasons. Well, another radio host, Ng Ka-lim, was sacked on Sunday night, hours after the big anti-Occupy Central march. He worked as a freelance DJ for internet radio station D100. Do you know who owns D100? Albert Cheng, the self-proclaimed defender of free speech. Do you know why Cheng fired Ng? For political reasons. D100 told Ng his political stand clashed with the station's because he was the MC at the march. But doesn't free speech allow you to have your own political stand? Only if you are Li Wei-ling, not if you are Ng Ka-lim. The funny thing is that Ng does not even take a political stand on air. He hosts a classical music show. What is even funnier is that Commercial Radio denied Li was sacked for political reasons, but Cheng actually admitted Ng was sacked for political reasons. Will the great defender of democracy Anson Chan condemn Ng's sacking as she did Li's? Ha! Will the Journalists Association, which speaks without fear of favour, come to Ng's defence as forcefully as it did Li's? Ha! Ha! Will the pan-democrats - or pan-hypocrites - demand a Legco inquiry? Hah! Hah! Hah!


Blatant double standards by city's 'pan-hypocrites'

Public Eye has to admit we are totally stumped. When mainlanders come here to join the annual July 1 march, pan-democrats hail it as fantastic that even mainlanders care about Hong Kong's democracy push. When mainlanders take part in the annual June 4 candlelight vigil, the pan-democrats praise them for caring about victims of the Tiananmen crackdown. But when mainlanders joined the anti-Occupy march on Sunday, the pan-democrats condemned that as interfering in our local affairs. Is it because the pan-democrats are pan-hypocrites?


Overpaid lawmakers have forgotten their duty

Our legislators are paid HK$87,450 a month, with a HK$16,000 allowance for entertainment and travelling, and many collect every cent. In return, they throw bananas at officials, march for democracy or butter up Beijing. They are blind to constant warnings by experts who, alarmed by rotting trees, say a tree law is urgently needed. They prefer squabbling over why Li Wei-ling was fired and why broadcasting investor Ricky Wong Wai-kay was refused a television licence. Last week, a pregnant woman died after a 10-metre tall tree fell on her in Mid-Levels. While the baby was delivered by caesarean section, alive but in critical condition, would his mother Zhang Qin, 37, be alive today if legislators had focused instead on pressing for a tree law? Her death should be on the conscience of all these overpaid clowns.


Michael Chugani is a columnist and television show host. mickchug@gmail.com



For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

Overpaid lawmakers. What a shame!
Michael made fair comment based on the facts though I cannot fully agree with him. I agree with me particularly on the sacking of Ng by Albert Cheng. Ng is only a host of a music programme which is politically neutral. Nonetheless Cheng's sacking Ng on his "assumed" political position was simply telling us "this guy is totally autocratic by heart and only democratic by mouth". This is another obvious show of "white terror".
The use of "blatant double standards" on the mainland demonstrators is inappropriate that I am sorry to hear from Michael. For those mainlanders who voluntarily join whatever demonstrations or activities, I respect them and Michael's comment should be valid. However, in "anti occupy central", lots of mainlanders were there because they were paid or mobilized to attend.
For the comment on the overpaid Legco member, fair comment but it is not exclusive to pan democrats legco member, it applies to all.
can anyone explain how every Hong Konger i speak to is in favour of greater democracy, yet the comments on this thread are almost entirely pro-Beijing?
There are a huge number of new 50 centers compared to a year ago and I'm guessing some pro Beijing/anti-freedom group is funding subscriptions so they can get these trolls to comment and try to "turn opinion" here.
Not that these pages really matter.
I'm assuming, of course, that SCMP still only allows comments for paid subscribers???
hen, now we have M C joining us as a 50 cents. And SCMP is giving out 50 cents for an article. Ha Ha Ha.
anyone can comment - i cancelled my subscription ages ago. Why pay for China propaganda when they will give it away for free elsewhere?
Pan-hyporcites are great believers in freedom of speech, i.e. freedom to agree with them!
Well done! Mr. Chungani, you have told us the truth that the self-proclaimed gladiators of the free speech only defense for their speech, not others. The truth is that the "free speech" is only for pan-democratic, not for others.
Egomaniac democrazy
full of false entitlements
if ever gets hold of power
will make the worst kind of autocrats
That’s how LiWL the shrew abused the mic then
and how her successors are working to attain the shrew’s skills
How very misogynistic of you, Pierce old boy.
Been a while since you've dipped your pen into the inkwell?




SCMP.com Account