• Tue
  • Dec 23, 2014
  • Updated: 11:55am
NewsHong Kong
POLITICS

Pan-democrats vow to fight 'more stringent than expected' NPC 2017 poll plan

PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 27 August, 2014, 9:58pm
UPDATED : Thursday, 28 August, 2014, 12:50pm
 

The central government moved a step closer to a showdown with pan-democrats yesterday after the nation's top legislative body hammered out a tougher-than-expected framework for electing Hong Kong's chief executive by universal suffrage in 2017.

Under an initial decision by the National People's Congress Standing Committee, only two or three candidates would be allowed to stand for the election and they would need 50 per cent support from a 1,200-member nominating committee, two sources said.

Beijing has taken the Hong Kong government’s role to decide the reform proposal
LEGISLATOR CHARLES MOK

Pan-democrats found the framework unacceptable and vowed to veto the Hong Kong government's reform proposal if it contained the same restrictions when it comes before the Legislative Council.

Some also pledged to join the Occupy Central movement, which plans to mobilise 10,000 people to block roads in the city's financial district if if there is not a "genuine" choice of candidates. The government needs the votes of at least five pan-democrat lawmakers to secure the required two-thirds majority in Legco for its reforms to launch the first "one person, one vote" election for the city's leader.

But the Democratic Party and information-technology sector lawmaker Charles Mok, seen as the main targets of the government's lobbying, said they could not see any room for further negotiation.

"I don't know what else can be discussed in the second round of consultation. Beijing has taken the Hong Kong government's role to decide the reform proposal," Mok said.

A third source familiar with the Standing Committee's decision said it did not mention amending the electoral method after 2017 - a possibility held out earlier by the Hong Kong and central governments to woo moderate pan-democrats to accept an "imperfect" model.

The stringency of the draft decision, especially the rule that the nominating committee should consist of 1,200 members - the same as the election committee that chose Leung Chun-ying in 2012 - appeared to have gone further than local NPC deputies' original expectations.

They had thought that the Standing Committee would set a 50 per cent nominating threshold and a cap on the number of candidates. Many proposals in the first round of consultation envisioned an expansion of the nominating committee.

About 170 Standing Committee members and 12 Hong Kong deputies to the NPC attended a plenary session yesterday, in which Basic Law Committee chairman Li Fei gave a briefing on the five-page draft decision.

The draft will be discussed in groups this morning before a final plenary session on Sunday to vote on the document.

NPC deputy Ip Kwok-him said he felt the draft "provided clear responses on core issues" - in reference to the debate on nomination.

The draft decision said the nominating committee should consist of people from four sectors - the business, professional, social and political sectors - with 300 members each.

But the first two sources confirmed that it did not mention some finer details, such as whether the mandate of the nominating committee should be expanded or whether the committee members could have more than one vote. It was understood that those issues would be further discussed in Hong Kong.

Speaking in Hong Kong, former Basic Law Committee member Wang Zhenmin called on Hong Kong people to accept the proposal, as "an imperfect universal suffrage [plan] can be improved in future".

Pan-democratic groups - including the Occupy campaigners, the Alliance for True Democracy and the Federation of Students - held a meeting last night to discuss the NPC draft.

Occupy co-organiser Benny Tai Yiu-ting said a demonstration would be held on Sunday outside the chief executive's office at Tamar. He said it would not be a "rehearsal" for the Occupy movement, but he would announce the campaign's next move then.

Democratic Party chairwoman Emily Lau Wai-hing said: "The Democratic Party must veto the reform if it turns out to be the proposal tabled in Legco."

 

KEY POINTS

  • Chief executive candidates will be named by a 1,200-strong nominating committee made up of representatives from four sectors
  • Number of candidates fixed at two or three
  • Aspirants will be required to secure support from at least half the nominating committee
  • The winner must clinch more than half the valid votes

 

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
37

This article is now closed to comments

A Hong Konger
This ends ANY doubt about Beijing's intentions: To impose on us a mechanism of oppression, where they control the law making bodies and interpret the Basic Law as they choose, even if it alienates us more, just as the white paper stated, all to assimilate HK further into China. It is fantasy to hope in accepting this plan that things will improved in future, if we give in what incentive is there for Beijing to improve things later?

To those who support Beijing and call on the Pan-dems to give in on key points, Your argument is dead. Beijing was NEVER going to negotiate, they only came here to coordinate with the local United Front. Meeting with the Pan-Dems was for show and perhaps intelligence gathering.

Maybe Beijing will blame the Pam-Dems position for this harsh poll plan, but I doubt they will bother. They know now we blame Beijing and can no longer pawn off responsibility to the HK gov, so they won't even try to win us over and will let the local United Front to clean up the mess they left.

If you believe subservience and cowardly grovelling will preserve HK then get up off your knees, and if you believe HK's oppression leads to the greater glory of China, the you are being manipulated and ought wake up. There is no profit or dignity in sleepwalking to oppression. I urge you join the Occupy Central movement, if you can't then contribute financially or logistically, how can you face your children if you selfishly do nothing or side with Beijing to destroy HK?
KwunTongBypass
Heyyy, why not just one candidate? And give him/her some advisors from the Pyongyang University Institute of Advanced Studies on Democracy.
scmpgt
This is like giving HK a choice between bad, really bad or terrible CE.
Dai Muff
We've already had all three. In that order.
LunarRepublic
I'm looking at the clock, and the hour hand's pointing to the word 'OCCUPY' in large black letters.
Dao-Phooy
Is anybody surprised? 50+ of the Nominating Committee which will be stuffed full of 'loyalists' - expect more polarization - what a series of duds we've had to endure: Tung, Tsang and CY Leung. How wisely the Central Authorities have chosen for us so we can look forward to an acceleration of the deterioration of our HK governance.
Dai Muff
If the CCP had made a sensible compromise offer and the democrats had rejected it, everyone could rightly blame the democrats for holding up democracy. However, this offer is not even a sensible compromise, and the NPCSC has proven itself stupid and unable to even consider what mature political thinking is.
ntmount
There's little chance this will get through Legco so we will probably end up with the same system as now. What a lost opportunity by all sides.
A Hong Konger
I'm afraid you're dreaming if you thought the outcome would have been any different.

Beijing's primary goal is to centralise power when it comes to HK, this will only increase over time as they try to assimilate HK more into China. They can not win us over, even they know that now, so they're not even going to try. Instead they will try and wear us down, but that is where they underestimate us.
Dai Muff
Of course, even if this passes, as long as we have one man one vote, the number of spoiled ballots or votes of no confidence will be extremely telling and will act pretty much as a referendum in themselves.

Pages

Login

SCMP.com Account

or