• Fri
  • Oct 24, 2014
  • Updated: 8:11pm
Universal Suffrage
NewsHong Kong
POLITICS

Hong Kong election rules could be here to stay, says top mainland official Li Fei

Beijing's divisive framework for CE vote may extend past 2017 even if vetoed by local lawmakers

PUBLISHED : Monday, 01 September, 2014, 11:11pm
UPDATED : Tuesday, 02 September, 2014, 4:08pm
 

Beijing's conservative framework for Hong Kong's universal suffrage in 2017 could apply to elections beyond that year even if it is vetoed by local lawmakers, a top mainland official said in a warning that deepened pan-democrats' desperation.

Li Fei's remark came as he explained to local community representatives the decision rolled out by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on Sunday for the city's first popular election to choose its leader in 2017.

It also came as three international political and legal scholars told the South China Morning Post that the new reform framework was a far cry from international democratic standards.

Li, chairman of the Basic Law Committee under the Standing Committee, was asked at a press conference whether the framework for the 2017 election would be re-tabled and applied to elections beyond that year, if it was vetoed by the Legislative Council.

"It has been considered," Li said.

"The decision has stipulated the term 'starting from 2017', meaning that the election method for universal suffrage in 2017 and beyond should also be based on this framework."

DON'T MISS: ‘A sad day for Hong Kong and democracy’: Scholar slams Beijing’s reform plan

But he also said amendments could be made in accordance with the "actual situation" in the future and consensus in society.

The Sunday decision allows only two or three candidates. Aspirants will first need approval from a simple majority of a 1,200-strong nominating committee before going to the public vote - a high threshold likely to block pan-democrats from running.

Martin Lee Chu-ming, founding chairman of the Democratic Party, called Li's remarks a "scare tactic" that showed disrespect for the reform process laid down by the Standing Committee in 2004.

Under this decision, the chief executive can suggest reform to Beijing, taking into account the situation in Hong Kong.

"What if the situation in Hong Kong improves in 2022 [the next election date after 2017] and we can have a better universal suffrage model? What Li said is trying to pre-empt the chief executive," Lee said.

Civic Party chairwoman Audrey Eu Yuet-mee said Li was applying double standards, noting that he had said in a morning speech that "no law cannot be amended" when responding to concerns over whether the present proposal was the ultimate destiny of Hong Kong.

In the morning session with some 800 representatives at AsiaWorld-Expo, Li said drafters decided to lay down a definite framework, having considered the "worries" of Hong Kong people about Occupy Central, the civil disobedience movement threatening to paralyse traffic in the business hub. He spelled out some of the technical issues to be dealt with by local officials in the next consultation.

Li was greeted by boisterous protests inside and outside the venue before he spoke.

Watch: Protesters and lawmakers react to Beijing's dictum on leadership reform

He stated an even tougher line on pan-democrats in another briefing with local senior officials: "Some Hong Kong people can never be chief executive - in the past, now or in future - if they remain confrontational."

"They should not dedicate their whole lives to the roads," Li added, in implicit reference to Occupy Central.

Occupy's co-organiser Chan Kin-man said: "The nominating committee is just handpicked politics in the disguise of universal suffrage."

Meanwhile, four of the major chambers of commerce - the Chinese General Chamber of Commerce, Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce, Chinese Manufacturers' Association and Federation of Hong Kong Industries - welcomed the Standing Committee's ruling.

CMA chief executive officer Adeline Wong and FHKI chairman Stanley Lau Chin-ho both said pan-democrats should look at the issue pragmatically. A CMA delegation will visit Beijing today to meet senior cadres.

Tycoon Li Ka-shing reiterated that "every effort for democracy will not be a vain struggle".

Watch: Almost nude man protests against NPC's "naked dictatorship"

Share

Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

46

This article is now closed to comments

Rambo
Martin Lee Chu-ming, Anson Chan and the Pan-democrats should immediately go to Capitol Hill and go see mama Nancy Pelosi about this nasty universal suffrage for HK.
timeasia
Why now? Why not give the Hong Kong people universal suffrage when they were under British rule as a "colony"? Would HK still be ruled as a "colony" if there was no handover?? Yes, that's because HK is a "colony" and HK people have no say. The British will tell you what you can and cannot do as they are the ruler and they defeated you. Ok now, raise the colonial flag and sing God Save the Queen!
kctony
Go back to Form one. How many more people are going to bring up this stupid comparison?
The Brits are foreigners. They took HK by force. HK was a colony. What do you expect?
Now our own people have taken over. They are ruling us just like the Brits.
Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Have you ever wondered why?
Worse, our own race promised universal suffrage in front of the whole world.
You have to be a very rich man to say something like this.
scmpgt
Wake up. UK did not inject 150 British poverty level citizen into HK to take a **** on the street everyday. They kept HK at a high level. Something the mainland can't seem to do.
ejmciii
Why is that relevant? The Brits were jerks. So that justifies the Communist tools in reneging on their promise to allow universal suffrage? You mainland tools are a riot. Which one of you is using the shared brain cell today? Apparently not you.
michaelhctam@gmail.com
Just give Colonial lovers some vanilla lollipop to put in their mouth and they'll be to busy to care.
kctony
You are referring to the fathers of the Henry Tang, James Tien, Chiang Lai wan and the whole Shanghai gang, right?
Why did they come to Hong Kong and not Taiwan ? They must have loved colonial with all their hearts.
Ant Lee
it is obvious HK people dont mind being ruled by China, but they do not want to be ruled by the communist party in china or russia or north korea. only the mainland chinese dont understand the difference between a party and a country.
anotherguy
i have been married for more than 10 years and never have I won an argument with my wife by brute force logic. CCP is not even related to us by blood, what makes people think they yield bc HK decides to play rough. Without fail, everyone has to invest love and patience in nurturing a relationship. Its more or less the same logic when it comes to relationship building.
anotherguy
Then what? u fight CCP and force them change their minds? Or perhaps, HK politicians should work together with China to see how we can influence them positively in the nation building process that puts more faith in democracy and make a change for the better? But wait, how have the pan-democrats behave so far, they bankrupted our credibility by behaving like kids and mentally deficient. Resting our trust on this bunch of fools is waste of time; these people belong to villages and not the international stage.

Pages

 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or