• Thu
  • Oct 23, 2014
  • Updated: 7:36pm
Occupy Central
NewsHong Kong
OCCUPY CENTRAL

‘We do what we say’: Occupy Central set the record straight after Benny Tai interview

Movement co-founder Chan Kin-man says some may be deterred by Beijing's decision to rule out open elections in Hong Kong - but more are angry and joining Occupy

PUBLISHED : Tuesday, 02 September, 2014, 6:21pm
UPDATED : Wednesday, 03 September, 2014, 8:39am
 

Occupy Central organisers affirmed their commitment to fighting for genuine universal suffrage by issuing a press release on Tuesday night, after co-founder Benny Tai told Bloomberg TV that the movement had failed to win concessions from Beijing on reform.

In the emailed statement entitled We do what we say. Occupy Central with Love and Peace, Occupy organisers set out to clarify several points regarding their objectives after Tai admitted that support for the planned sit-in was "waning" in the Bloomberg interview.

“The objective of Occupy Central is to fight for genuine universal suffrage in Hong Kong. Our target is a 2017 Chief Executive election that meets international standards,” the statement began.

“Although this target has been brutally strangled by the National People’s Congress Standing Committee, the significance of our movement will not end at this point.

In the statement, the organisers of the pro-democracy group re-iterated that they planned to follow through on their programme of planned civil disobedience.

We have said that if the government does not keep their promise to allow Hongkongers to have genuine universal suffrage in 2017, we will occupy Central with love and peace
Occupy Central statement

"We Hongkongers won’t accept failure in our road to democracy. We have said that if the government does not keep their promise to allow Hongkongers to have genuine universal suffrage in 2017, we will occupy Central with love and peace,” the statement continued.

"We will do what we said. This is the principle we Hongkongers have to insist and want the Chinese government to understand. One major purpose of Occupy Central is to promote public engagement.”

The statement continued:  "We must show our dissatisfaction with the decision and maintain a spirit of resistance in the community. It is not correct to say that we have less support from the community after Beijing has made the decision.

"Although some pragmatic supporters may leave, new supporters are joining us because they are angry about the Chinese government’s decision and are firm to show the dignity and willpower of Hongkongers. 

"In these two days, we have received emails from scholars and professionals confirming that they would support us because they found that all the doors of dialogue were closed," it concluded.

Earlier on Tuesday, one of group’s co-founders told the Post that Occupy Central leaders were still determined to blockade streets in the centre of Hong Kong as part of long-term civil disobedience campaign – and more people were joining the pro-democracy movement.

Dr Chan Kin-man was clarifying an interview fellow co-founder Benny Tai Yiu-ting gave to Bloomberg during which Tai said the movement had failed to win concessions from Beijing on reform and that support for the sit-in was waning.

On Sunday the national legislature decided on a restrictive framework for the 2017 chief executive election in Hong Kong, effectively ruling out the possibility of a genuine choice between candidates.

Occupy Central’s strategy has failed and support is waning, Benny Tai admits in extraordinary interview

Chan said the pessimistic tone in Tai’s interview was “not an accurate” representation of the mood within the movement.

“Some 5,000 people joined the rally on Sunday to oppose Beijing’s ruling, even on such short notice,” said Chan, an associate professor of sociology at Chinese University. “I am sure the participants [of Occupy Central] would be in the thousands. Whether it’s 9,000 or 10,000 … I don’t know.

“Of course there are some pragmatic citizens who believe that there is no need to carry out Occupy Central as the National People’s Congress Standing Committee has ruled out universal suffrage for Hong Kong,” said Chan.

“But at the same time, I have received many emails from moderate people who are angered by the decision, saying they are now more determined than ever to join the movement.

“So while there are some people leaving there are more angry people joining – I would not expect there’s a big change in the number of our supporters,” Chan said, adding that over 3,000 people had signed a pledge to join the civil disobedience campaign.

Another founding member, the Reverend Chu Yiu-ming, said the movement was ready for a long struggle. 

"The battle is only halfway through. It's too early to give up," Chu said, adding that Occupy had already succeeded in making political reform the biggest issue in Hong Kong. 

“Without Occupy, the matter might not have become the city’s focus and have been widely debated by Hongkongers in the past year,” he said.

Chu also confirmed that the movement will announce the names of an alternative leadership structure on Thursday. One leader and four or five deputies would step in for Tai, Chan and Chu if they are arrested.

Chan clarified Tai’s hint that the movement would take place on a public holiday to “minimise possible economic damage to society”.

He said they might choose a public holiday to begin the occupation in order to allow supporters reluctant to break the law to take part. Chater Road in Central is closed to traffic on Sundays and public holidays.

“We are talking about days of occupation – it’s not only a one-day action,” he said. The organisers have two or three start dates in mind and a final decision has yet to be made.

Chan said the most important point of the protest was not to cause economic damage but to set a high-profile and non-violent example of self-sacrifice. The public can see how the protesters are treated and if they are arrested, and then decide where their sympathies lie. 

While the movement’s leaders agree the sit-in itself will not change the “political reality” in the short term, it could influence the public’s mood in the long term, as part of a wider civil disobedience campaign, Chan said. 

He agreed with Tai that the movement had failed to change Beijing’s mind during the negotiation period with the threat of a mass protest. Now the campaign would have to enter a new phase.

“I am of course very disappointed … but I have already accepted the reality,” Chan said. “We wanted to change Beijing’s stance but their decision could not have been any worse. There is no shades of grey between genuine and fake universal suffrage.”

Benny Tai could not be reached for comment on Tuesday evening. 

Watch: Occupy Central leaders promise civil disobedience campaign in Hong Kong

 

Share

Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

14

This article is now closed to comments

S. Rogers
Pan-Democrats should begin the process of setting up a shadow government, and should focus on organizing multiple levels of civic organizations and broad communication networks for their ideas and policies. Over a period of years, they can demonstrate how responsible opposition works.
540608b2-e0fc-4a24-88bf-4c560a320968
"Pan-democratic lawmakers and pro-democracy activists in Hong Kong have protested strongly against a election framework passed by Beijing on August 31, 2014, saying it fails to reach international standards for a truly democratic and open election." - SCMP
It may be time to question the goal of meeting 'international standards' wrt elections. An example of how Universal Suffrage can backfire on a once powerful Country ... is the present situation in the United States. The election of popular but unqualified leaders will quickly bring China to its' economic, educational and military knees.
sjfore
Thank you for telling the world that you don't understand the concept of democracy.
ken.pan.980
Help me understand something here -- under British rule, none of the Governors of Hong Kong were elected by the people of Hong Kong. Not Chris Patten, not David Wilson, not even MacLehose. So where were those "brave Hongkongers" demanding universal suffrage and a right to vote back then?
...
...
...
Hear the crickets? That's right, nowhere to be found. During 150 years or so of British rule, people like Ms. Anson Chan never asked the British to give Hongkongers the right to vote.
In fact, Ms. Anson Chan served happily as a colonial official. For lack of better words, in her position as an indentured servant, she was willing to bend over backwards and get f-cked in every possible way by the British while screaming "MOAR MOAR MOAR".
So why now? You tell me.
jenny@asian-emphasis.com
Rita Fan and Regina Ip happily served in colonial times - why not criticize these people? They will serve whoever is in power, in order to get power for themselves!
sjfore
Please realize that this trope is very old and tired at this point, and it was always illogical.
randomtask
Anyone with a conscience would not support occupy, there is no group in HK to stand for freedom and individual rights. The only thing HK people can do now is vote with their feet.
LunarRepublic
If you think we're just going to abandon our home without even a bit of resistance, think again.
There are plenty of groups in Hong Kong who support freedom and civil rights. Occupy's still happening, and if not Occupy then some other movement will arise to protest against the CCP for its manipulation of Hong Kong.
5405eefb-3f5c-457e-b032-08da0a3209ca
If Occupy Central try to close down Central, it will only hurt the people of HK. And there is no chance of Beijing changing its mind in the face of such action. The battle is lost - accept the position, move on and work with the new arrangements.
scmpgt
Oh no. This might even bring down the cost of property and real estate.

Pages

 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or