Advertisement

Carrie Lam will get nowhere unless Beijing drops its hardline stance on Hong Kong

Former Democratic Party leader Emily Lau says the city’s next leader must persuade the central government to respect the views of Hongkongers

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Carrie Lam is applauded by her defeated rivals, John Tsang (left) and Woo Kwok-hing. Photo: Robert Ng
The charade that is called the Hong Kong chief executive election came to a close on Sunday when the former chief secretary Carrie Lam won by securing 777 votes, defeating her main rival, former financial secretary John Tsang, who received 365 votes. The third candidate, former judge Woo Kwok-hing, got only 21 votes.

To the over seven million people in Hong Kong, the process was nothing but a joke because most of them had no say. Only 1,194 members of the Election Committee could vote, and these privileged few were elected by a quarter of a million people drawn from the commercial, political and professional elite.

However, it was not for the Election Committee members to decide who could be chief executive, as Beijing insisted on having the final say. Therefore the so-called electoral process was just a smoke screen for Beijing’s appointment.

Advertisement

Although Mrs Lam won the election, she lost heavily to Mr Tsang in the popularity contest. This was mainly due to mistakes she made during the election campaign and because mainland officials had lobbied furiously on her behalf, using thuggish methods to intimidate and bully some Election Committee members into supporting her.

Such coercive methods angered and upset many Hong Kong people, who failed to understand why the central government could not allow the three candidates, who are all from the pro-establishment camp, to fight it out.

Advertisement

According to the Basic Law, whoever wins the election can only become chief executive if he or she is appointed by Beijing. But obviously that is not enough. Beijing has to intervene from beginning to end, thus turning the electoral process into a farce.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x