Advertisement

Exclusive | Conflict-of-interest row rocks Hong Kong building assessment body

BEAM Society (BSL), which runs the BEAM Plus assessment scheme, has monopoly to carry out assessments that are required to obtain lucrative concessions

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
0
The BEAM Plus tests assess a project in several areas including energy use, site ventilation, indoor air quality, water consumption and waste management. The Hang Seng Management College in Shatin is one of the BEAM Plus success stories which have been achieved the Final assessment ratings. The college makes well use of architectural fins and low-e glass to optimize indoor daylight and reduce glare effect. Photo: BEAM

Leaked documents have revealed conflict-of-interest allegations involving directors of a not-for-profit organisation with a monopoly on green building assessments that allow developers to claim government incentives worth billions of dollars.

The allegations centre on the BEAM Society (BSL), which runs the BEAM Plus assessment scheme. Since 2011, registering for the BEAM Plus scheme has been a prerequisite for developers wishing to increase the gross floor area of projects by 10 per cent without paying the government any extra premium under a Buildings Department plan to encourage green development.

But many of BSL's 25 directors are drawn from companies in the construction and property sector, and BSL staff members have alleged that directors approved plans or project submissions in which they had a vested interest.

The case sparked alarm given the public interest involved. One lawmaker was "aghast" that a private organisation with no government oversight was handed such a monopoly.

In a letter dated May 16, 2013, a copy of which was seen by the South China Morning Post, BSL's secretariat complains of a lack of fairness, transparency and accountability in the operation of the BEAM Plus assessment scheme, and says some directors abused their power.

BSL chairman Professor John Ng Cheuk-yee said the board had investigated the complaint but that "it would not be appropriate to divulge further information".
BSL chairman Professor John Ng Cheuk-yee said the board had investigated the complaint but that "it would not be appropriate to divulge further information".
"Their roles have allowed them to gain enormous power with BSL, ie, sometimes they report to themselves for actions they take and could approve the plans that they themselves propose," reads the letter to BSL's board. It is signed by the secretariat's administrative team, marketing and training team, and technical team.
Advertisement