UK case harks back to Hong Kong attack
Ex-wife of former Cathay Pacific pilot wins right to her London flat 23 years after he was accused of assaulting her in their Hong Lok Yuen house
A former Hong Kong woman who emerged victorious from a bitter courtroom battle in London this week was at the centre of a high-profile legal controversy more than two decades ago which helped re-shape attitudes towards domestic violence in the city.
Hostilities between wealthy divorcee Ann Hersmen-Wilkinson and a her ex-husband, a former Cathay Pacific pilot, were renewed in Central London County Court last week – more than 25 years after he was arrested and charged over a knife attack on her at their New Territories home.
It was the end of a bruising legal tussle which exposed a venomous 30-year feud between mother and daughter that began when the pair - along with Hersmen-Wilkinson’s then husband, Cathay Pacific pilot Ian Wilkinson, moved to Hong Kong in 1985.
Hersmen-Wilkinson rejected that version of events saying she was simply worried that her ‘’out of control’’ daughter had gone missing, ‘’could be in the company of a herion-dealing triad gangster’’ and simply added that Fluffy the dog was missing too.
However it was an earlier violent argument between Caroline’s mother and father on New Year’s Eve 1992 at their home in Hong Lok Yuen in the New Territories that led to consternation at the very top of the city’s legal system.
Court records form the time report that Ian Wilkinson attacked his wife with a knife and “applied pressure to her throat with his hands’’.
Wilkinson - who had been seeing a psychologist at the time - was initially charged with wounding under The Offences Against the Person Act, which carried a maximum jail term of three years. But to the amazement of many - including the presiding magistrate Ernest Lim - when the case finally came to trial, prosecutors offered no evidence, leaving Lim no option but to dismiss the charges against Wilkinson and order him to be bound over for a year with a bond of HK$20,000.
It also prompted lawmakers in the Legislative Council to demand answers from Hong Kong’s top legal official at the time, Attorney General, Jeremy Matthews, over why the original charges against Wilkinson were dropped.
A lengthy explanatory document in response to lawmaker concerns went only as far as saying that the decision took into account ‘’the interests of the defendant, the victim and the public’’ fuelling the anger of women’s rights advocates.
Hersmen-Wilkinson has been living in Spain for many years but wants to return to live in England, prompting the legal action over her Kensington property.