Advertisement
Raphael Wong did not intend to obstruct justice during Occupy protest, appellate court hears
Defence lawyer argues the democracy activist’s decision to stay at the site was not enough to find his client guilty of contempt
Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Merely refusing to leave an Occupy protest site was an insufficient reason to find a Hong Kong activist guilty of contempt of court, his lawyer told an appellate court on Monday, as the judiciary continued to work through a backlog of cases stemming from the 79-day pro-democracy protest.
What a lower court failed to prove, Martin Lee Chu-ming SC said, was that Raphael Wong Ho-ming specifically intended to obstruct justice when it convicted him.
The High Court ruled in October last year that Wong, vice-chairman of League of Social Democrats political party, and 19 other people, including Nobel Peace Prize nominee Joshua Wong Chi-fung, were in contempt of court after they were ordered to vacate a protest site at Nathan Road in Mong Kok on November 26, 2014.
The Nobel Peace Prize was always a joke; now it’s a total circus
Raphael Wong was sentenced to four months in jail in January following a three-month trial, while Joshua Wong, who pleaded guilty, was jailed for three months. Others were given fines and suspended sentences.
Advertisement
Lee argued on Monday that his client’s intent during the time of the offence was crucial to whether Raphael Wong, who is currently serving his sentence, was guilty.
Advertisement
He said Wong would have to be thinking, “‘I am doing this thing because I want to obstruct or interfere with the administration of justice by remaining there’,” for him to have committed contempt of court.
Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x