Beijing won’t appoint winner of chief executive race if it finds candidate ‘unacceptable’, elder statesman Tung Chee-hwa warns
Vice-chairman of China’s top advisory body says city’s leader has to be someone central government trusts
The Post understands that Tung, who was Hong Kong’s first chief executive, made the remarks on Friday during a closed-door meeting attended by more than 30 advisers to his non-governmental think tank, Our Hong Kong Foundation.
Watch: Hong Kong’s leadership race explained in 60 seconds
Tung, vice-chairman of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, did not elaborate on why Beijing was unwilling to trust Tsang.
“In order to avoid the embarrassment [of Tsang winning the contest], the central government is making an all-out effort to help Carrie Lam’s campaign,” the adviser added.
For his part, Tsang said there were “always rumours in every election”.
“What you have heard are just rumours. I think you will be hearing more sorts of things as we approach the end of the nomination stage,” Tsang said after attending a separate function.
Wang said Beijing’s trust in the next chief executive was the most important criterion among the four he had cited in a previous interview.
Tai Hay-lap, another adviser to the foundation, confirmed that Tung had discussed issues relating to the chief executive race at the Friday meeting.
“Mr Tung responded to some advisers’ concern about the central government’s appointment of the winner in the election,” he said.
“But it’s inappropriate for me to reveal what Mr Tung said.”
During a regular meeting of the foundation yesterday, Tung reiterated the next chief executive should be someone who could lead a proactive administration, according to Teresa Cheng Yeuk-wah SC, a think tank adviser.
“[Tung] mentioned that the leader should be able to bring Hongkongers hope and be trusted by the central government,” Cheng said.
When asked if the former chief executive was referring to Lam, she said: “These are all objective criteria [spelled out by Tung] and he did not name anyone.”
In her campaign, Lam has been highlighting her proactive approach to governance, compared with arch-rival Tsang, who has argued that a heavily divided society needs a respite after the political turmoil and polarisation of the past few years.
A foundation spokeswoman said yesterday that Tung believed there was a need for a competent chief executive with a strong commitment to lead the city.
“Mr Tung is of the view that a chief executive who enjoys the trust of the central government is a good thing because he or she can facilitate communication between the central government and Hong Kong,” the spokeswoman said.
“There would be by-election, there would be repercussions ... but I think Hong Kong should be strong enough to stand up to that,” she said. “Of course, I do not want this scenario to happen.”
Ip said Beijing should instead have more trust in the judgment of Election Committee members who are tasked to pick the right leader for Hong Kong.
Democratic Party chairman Wu Chi-wai urged the Registration and Electoral Office to launch an investigation into Tung’s remarks to ensure the election is fair.
Tung’s comments, Wu said, had reflected that the central government’ strong effort in lobbying votes for Lam.
“As the former chief executive, Tung should clearly know that everybody should uphold the principle of ‘one country, two systems’,” Wu said.
Civic Party lawmaker Dennis Kwok said it would be unacceptable for Beijing to refuse to appoint a duly-elected chief executive.
“It would only anger Hongkongers even more. Even if Carrie Lam was elected like this, her mandate and authority would be greatly undermined, and she would be leading a lame-duck government on her first day in office,” Kwok said.