White House denies David Petraeus' claim on consulate attack in Libya

PUBLISHED : Monday, 19 November, 2012, 12:00am
UPDATED : Monday, 19 November, 2012, 3:42am

The White House denied having heavily edited talking points to UN ambassador Susan Rice about the deadly attacks on a US mission in Libya to remove references to terrorism.

"The only edit that was made by the White House and also by the State Department was to change the word 'consulate' to the word 'diplomatic facility', since the facility in Benghazi was not formally a consulate," deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes said aboard Air Force One. "Other than that, we were guided by the points that were provided by the intelligence community. So I can't speak to any other edits that may have been made."

Republican lawmakers briefed by former CIA chief David Petraeus on Friday said that the original talking points about the attack had mentioned groups linked to al-Qaeda. But Petraeus told the lawmakers that the reference was removed from a final version given to Rice before she discussed the attack on five Sunday television talk shows and said the assault was a response to an amateur video denigrating Islam and the Prophet Mohammed.

The initial talking points "specifically mentioned al-Qaeda, and that al-Qaeda was involved in the attack", Republican Congressman Peter King, who attended the briefing, told Fox News. "When the talking points were finalised, all the references to al-Qaeda were taken out and it was put in almost as an afterthought saying there are indications of extremist involvement in the demonstration."

Critics have seized on Rice's remarks to argue that the White House misled or even lied to Americans during a heated election season. But President Barack Obama's administration has denied it misled the public, insisting it was providing information based on the intelligence available at the time.