• Fri
  • Dec 26, 2014
  • Updated: 11:28pm
Edward Snowden

Whistle-blower Snowden has own 'no fly zone'

Bolivian president's plane is diverted after four European countries close airspace, fearing fugitive Edward Snowden was on board

PUBLISHED : Thursday, 04 July, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Thursday, 04 July, 2013, 11:33am

The world just got a whole lot smaller for Edward Snowden.

Western European countries apparently shut their airspace to Bolivian president Evo Morales' plane because of speculation the fugitive US national security whistle-blower was on board. Their alleged actions forced Morales' plane to divert to Austria, where it was searched, and triggered a diplomatic row.

They also suggest how difficult it will be for Snowden to leave Moscow's Sheremetyevo airport, where he has been stuck in transit since leaving Hong Kong 10 days ago.

France, Italy, Spain and Portugal were said to have closed their airspace to the plane as the South American leader was flying home after talks in Moscow. French, Spanish and Portuguese officials denied having done so.

Before boarding his plane in Moscow, Morales had said he would consider an application for asylum from Snowden, and Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro said the 30-year-old deserved "the world's protection".

Morales flew out of the Austrian capital yesterday after a stopover of more than 12 hours.

The Bolivian ambassador to the UN, Sacha Llorenti, said a complaint would be lodged with UN chief Ban Ki-moon.

"The decisions of these countries have violated international law," he said.

Bolivia's regional allies Venezuela, Ecuador, Cuba and Nicaragua harshly criticised the European countries involved.

"It's clear that the US is chasing him down but it's harder to tell how much political European considerations are behind it," said Professor Martin Scheinin, an expert in international law and human rights at the European University Institute in Italy.

Scheinin said Snowden's options were limited despite the wide net he had cast by applying for political asylum with more than 20 countries, because the former CIA analyst's legal position was not clear-cut.

"It's a difficult case and his likelihood of getting asylum in Nordic or western European countries is quite slim," he said.

"To grant Snowden protection without a legal obligation to do so would be a discretionary political act and probably no European country would want to be seen carrying out such an act."

Scheinin said asylum used to be granted for protection on political or personal grounds "but more and more, countries are conflating it with the legal obligation to recognise refugee status". Snowden would not meet the definition of a refugee because he is not a member of a persecuted group. "Snowden is subject to criminal prosecution and imprisonment, not persecution."

Additional reporting by Agence France-Presse



Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

hard times !
You are being milked by your Uncle Sam's mistress,maybe.
John Adams
I agree !
The USA cannot sweep this under the carpet, just like they could not sweep Martin Luther King under the carpet.
For generations the USA denied the blacks the vote and discriminated against the blacks, and pretended the issue did not exist ( although the USA was supposed to be the world's leading 'democracy' / 'upholder of the truth' / 'light of the nations' etc).
For generations the USA lived in denial about the black issue. But finally they were forced to confront it and deal with it - and look what huge racial problems they have now because they dealt with the problem later rather than sooner.
It's the same with Snowden Gate - the longer the USA lives in denial and tries to cover up what they have been doing in the world : spying on their friends and allies 'in the name of freedom' the worse the consequences when they are finally forced to admit it's true and deal with it.
Nixon learned this lesson the hard way with Watergate. Sad that Obama apparently does not read recent USA history.
I feel very sad for the USA - always with its head in the sand
Also it is setting a terrible example for China.
Seems the USA tells China : "Do what we say / not what we do"
"Yes, we Scan !!", or is it "les miserables", or is it "man from hawaii" or is it "on Russian soil !" or "blitz at dawn !" or whatever the current forum name you have chosen,
Please read the terms and conditions of SCMP.com, especially section 4.4.
Ohh, thank you for pointing this out.I am sorry, I was such a jerk!! I will stop my stupid rants now.
hard times !
you are the faked 'Yes, we Scan !!' go to meet Marx the sooner the better for being so shameless and shameful in disguising as another writer ! Shame on your evil act ! Shame on you !!!
hard times !
hahahaha not hehehehe instead ? You idiotic stupid fool ! You are fooled ! Arent't you ? Pl.look at yourself in the mirror !
Don't be so naive.
Espionage and spy activities have been going on for centuries; even between allies. The difference is it can be scandalous and embarassing when one country is caught doing so.
Just to give an example, French agents went undercover in New Zealand in 1985 to blow up the Greenpeace ship "Rainbow Warrior".
Agree with KwunTongBypass, SCMP better put this person right.
The style goes like ....
"blah blah blah blah leaker-hero blah blah blah !"
"blah blah blah blah blah. Right?"
A lot of exclamation points both in the post and the ever changing names; and always have a space before the exclamation point. Names like "out of grid !", "on Russian soil !", "The Tempora !", "Big Bro's watching !", "my beloved country !", "the whistle-blower !"
I think this person(s) is(are) obsessed with Snowden and would gladly be his pet phoenix to be stroke ;-)
President Obama publicly discounted Snowdon as a 29-year-old hacker, but Obama's real sentiments are revealed by these frantic efforts to arrest Snowdon. This is another instance of how important it is not to take Obama's words at face value. I was astonished to learn that Gallup (July 2, 2013) says 76% of Americans still think Obama is "likable." But, I cannot "like" a leader so given to lies and dissimulation. This partly explains why in March 2013 Henry Kissinger implied that Obama is not trusted by foreign governments who were also said not to know where he is going internationally. For example, Obama himself admitted that his June 2013 Sunnylands meeting with President Xi Jinping was really tough sledding. And no better was Obama's Northern Ireland meeting with President Vladimir Putin. Significantly, Obama is disdained by these foreign leaders and others (Merkel, Hollande), partly because they understand that 90% of what passes for foreign policy under Obama is really aimed at deceiving the American people rather than influencing foreign governments. For example, empty USA talk about "the pivot to Asia" was probably no more than President Obama's attempt to get some public-relations cover for USA withdrawal from the Middle East. Is that strategy of retreat from the Middle East good policy? Maybe. But, my point is that Obama consistently fails to be open and honest with the American people. President Obama is easily the most devious USA president in my lifetime.



SCMP.com Account