• Wed
  • Dec 24, 2014
  • Updated: 5:15am

Asiana plane crash

On Saturday, July 6 2013, an Asiana Airlines Boeing 777 carrying mostly Chinese passengers crashed and burst into flames as it landed short of the runway at San Francisco International Airport. Two teenage girls were killed and more than 180 people were injured.


Did Korean cockpit culture contribute to Asiana crash?

US investigators are examining if aspects of Korean social hierarchy played a role in the crash of Asiana flight 214 in San Francisco

PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 10 July, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Wednesday, 10 July, 2013, 1:07pm

A comment by the top US air safety official, assessing the Asiana Airlines crash in San Francisco, sounds innocuous to the average ear, but it might amount to a link with a remarkable 1999 crash of a Boeing 747 in London, and the hierarchical structure of Korean culture.

"We are looking at communication between the two crew members," US National Transportation Safety Board Chairman Deborah Hersman said from the scene where the South Korean Boeing 777 crashed on Saturday, killing two teenaged girls bound from China to a summer camp in the United States.

Investigators began interviewing flight crew amid mounting indications that pilot error may have caused the accident.

Flight data showed the plane had been travelling at about 106 knots (196km/h) when its tail slammed into a sea wall short of the runway - sharply lower than the target speed necessary for landing. "137 knots is the speed that they want to have when they cross the threshold of the runway," Hersman said, noting that the crew were tasked with ensuring the correct speed of the plane.

"The crew is responsible to make a safe approach to the airport. (Air traffic controllers) are not responsible for speed management on the aircraft."

Particular scrutiny of cockpit communication brings to mind the disaster that occurred on December 22, 1999, when Korean Air Cargo Flight 8509 plunged to the ground near London.

The investigation that followed, even when described in the terse terms of such reports, revealed a remarkable dynamic in the cockpit that has been linked to Korean social hierarchy.

When the plane took off after dark, the pilot's cockpit indicator, called an artificial horizon, wasn't working. But the copilot's was.

When the pilot began to execute a planned banked turn, the horizon instrument in front of him didn't register that the plane was already tilted. Unable to see that the plane already had banked, he continued to bank farther, even though a warning buzzer sounded nine times.

"There was no audible acknowledgment from any crew member regarding these warnings," said the final investigative report of the British Air Accidents Investigation Branch. The plane's wing tore into the ground. All four crew died.

The plane's pilot was Park Duk-kyu, a 57-year-old former air force fighter pilot. The first officer was Yoon Ki-sik, 33, who had far less experience.

The report said that though Yoon was communicating correct information to the tower, Park spoke at him in a "derogatory" way, saying: "Make sure you understand what ground control is saying before you speak."

What they were struggling with was a cultural legacy, that Korean culture is hierarchical. You are obliged to be deferential toward your elders and superiors in a way that would be unimaginable in the US

Seconds later, he barked: "Answer them! They are asking how long the delay will be."

"By making these comments, it is considered that the commander contributed to setting a tone which discouraged further input from other crew members," the report said.

When the plane went into its ill-fated bank less than a minute into the flight, the first officer said nothing, even though the instrument in front of him indicated that the plane was turned almost sideways, the report said.

Author Malcolm Gladwell examined the Korean culture's influence in airplane cockpits in his 2008 book Outliers. "Korean Air had more plane crashes than almost any other airline in the world for a period at the end of the 1990s," Gladwell said in an interview with Fortune magazine just after the book came out.

"What they were struggling with was a cultural legacy, that Korean culture is hierarchical. You are obliged to be deferential toward your elders and superiors in a way that would be unimaginable in the US."

In their formal recommendations, British investigators called on Korean Air "to promote a more free atmosphere between the captain and the first officer".

There has been no direct suggestion that the crash of flight 214 was caused by a communication failure. The NTSB would review what the pilot and co-pilot said regardless of their nationality.



Additional reporting by Agence France-Presse


Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

John Adams
I think the answer is very certainly 'yes'
Most Koreans I have known - many of whom I count as best friends - have extreme problems with anger management , which interlinks with the the hierarchical structure of Korean culture.
Watch any Korean soap opera if you don't believe me.
A tribute to Chinese influence and, by extension, the cancerous poison that is Confucianism.
In my experience with Korean colleagues, this is a valid question to ask - without pre-judging the answer: NTSB would be remiss in their duties if they failed to do so.
At least they didn't stoop to Christian teachings and just started praying. That would've really accomplished nothing.
But isn't Japanese culture also very hierarchical and perhaps even more so than the Korean one? Are their airlines also prone to such problems? Just wondering...
Their airlines may not be prone to such problems, but their nuclear reactors and disaster response seem to be prone to similar issues.
What a load of nonsense. What are they trying to prove by detailing another incident that just happened to be also a Korean crew? Never mind the fact that any trained professional of any cultural background would execute appropriate procedures during emergency, how can WaPo be so certain to insinuate that what might be a factor in the London crash is also at play in this tragedy? Americans and Europeans hate it when being stereotyped by others, yet they usually have no problem stereotyping and generalizing about other races and cultures.
Wow, I had no idea a simple, one line comment could stir up so much enmity. Perhaps it would not have been so had I been more descriptive:
Those who understand Confucianism will know that it is inherently patriarchal, autocratic, past-centric, and authoritarian, and encourages the forming of societies founded on inequality (including gender and social), conformity, and class rigidity. It also emphasizes maintaining harmony and social stability, and therefore opposes development, since any development must come at the cost of instability. Confucianism employs the following “tools”: a) preeminence and reverence of the older generation, exemplified by ancestral worship; b) coercive social pressure to conform through ceremonies and strict, elaborate social codes as outlined by the Book of Rites and; c) indoctrination through rote learning, exemplified by the ancient civil service examinations. It aims to stifle critical thought and intellectual pursuit; in other words, it does not dare to innovate or to dream.
This makes Confucianism a rigid, social class centric system that is diametrically opposed to equality, liberty, and social progress. Like a virus, it poisons the minds of the youth, constricting their ability to lead societal development away from Confucian statism. Like a cancer, it pervades every part of a culture, the core of any civilization.
The character limit prevents me from writing more, but that, in a nutshell, is the rationale behind my comment.


SCMP.com Account